[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Design, construction and mechanical testing of digital 3D anatomical data-based PCL–HA bone tissue engineering scaffold

  • Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the techniques of design and construction of CT 3D reconstructional data-based polycaprolactone (PCL)–hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffold. Femoral and lumbar spinal specimens of eight male New Zealand white rabbits were performed CT and laser scanning data-based 3D printing scaffold processing using PCL–HA powder. Each group was performed eight scaffolds. The CAD-based 3D printed porous cylindrical stents were 16 piece × 3 groups, including the orthogonal scaffold, the Pozi-hole scaffold and the triangular hole scaffold. The gross forms, fiber scaffold diameters and porosities of the scaffolds were measured, and the mechanical testing was performed towards eight pieces of the three kinds of cylindrical scaffolds, respectively. The loading force, deformation, maximum-affordable pressure and deformation value were recorded. The pore-connection rate of each scaffold was 100 % within each group, there was no significant difference in the gross parameters and micro-structural parameters of each scaffold when compared with the design values (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the loading force, deformation and deformation value under the maximum-affordable pressure of the three different cylinder scaffolds when the load was above 320 N. The combination of CT and CAD reverse technology could accomplish the design and manufacturing of complex bone tissue engineering scaffolds, with no significant difference in the impacts of the microstructures towards the physical properties of different porous scaffolds under large load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L, Chen KS, Mirams M. Endochondral ossification: how cartilage is converted into bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohner D, Hutmacher DW, Cheng TK, Oberholzer M, Hammer B. In vivo efficacy of bone marrow-coated polycaprolactone scaffolds for the reconstruction of orbital defects in the pig. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;66:574–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamath MS, Ahmed SS, Dhanasekaran M, Santosh SW. Polycaprolactone scaffold engineered for sustained release of resveratrol: therapeutic enhancement in bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:183–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shim JH, Huh JB, Park JY, Jeon YC, Kang SS, Kim JY, et al. Fabrication of blended polycaprolactone/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate thin membrane using solid freeform fabrication technology for guided bone regeneration. Tissue Eng A. 2013;19:317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC. Bridging the regeneration gap: stem cells, biomaterials and clinical translation in bone tissue engineering. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473:124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding C, Qiao Z, Jiang W, Li H, Wei J, Zhou G, et al. Regeneration of a goat femoral head using a tissue-specific, biphasic scaffold fabricated with CAD/CAM technology. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6706–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alothman OY, Almajhdi FN, Fouad H. Effect of gamma radiation and accelerated aging on the mechanical and thermal behavior of HDPE/HA nano-composites for bone tissue regeneration. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1169–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira IH, Ayres E, Averous L, Schlatter G, Hebraud A, de Paula AC, Viana PH, Goes AM, Oréfice RL. Differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells seeded on mineralized electrospun co-axial poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)/gelatin nanofibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25:1137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pok S, Myers JD, Madihally SV, Jacot JG. A multilayered scaffold of a chitosan and gelatin hydrogel supported by a PCL core for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5630–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodfield TB, Moroni L, Malda J. Combinatorial approaches to controlling cell behaviour and tissue formation in 3D via rapid-prototyping and smart scaffold design. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009;12:562–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gloria A, Causa F, Russo T, Battista E, Della Moglie R, Zeppetelli S, De Santis R, Netti PA, Ambrosio L. Three-dimensional poly(ε-caprolactone) bioactive scaffolds with controlled structural and surface properties. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:3510–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nitya G, Nair GT, Mony U, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV. In vitro evaluation of electrospun PCL/nanoclay composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:1749–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CH, Cook JL, Mendelson A, Moioli EK, Yao H, Mao JJ. Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study. Lancet. 2010;376:440–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang JH, Castano O, Kim HW. Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:1065–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carletti E, Motta A, Migliaresi C. Scaffolds for tissue engineering and 3D cell culture. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;695:17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Domingos M, Intranuovo F, Russo T, De Santis R, Gloria A, Ambrosio L, Ciurana J, Bartolo P. The first systematic analysis of 3D rapid prototyped poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds manufactured through BioCell printing: the effect of pore size and geometry on compressive mechanical behaviour and in vitro hMSC viability. Biofabrication. 2013;5:045004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganesh N, Ashokan A, Rajeshkannan R, Chennazhi KP, Koyakutty M, Nair S. MR functional nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated PCL composite scaffolds for in situ monitoring of bone tissue regeneration by MRI. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(19–20):2783–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ban˜obre-Lo´pez M, Pin˜eiro-Redondo Y, De Santis R, Gloria A, Ambrosio L, Tampieri A, Dediu V, Rivas J. Poly(caprolactone) based magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:07B313.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Santis RD, Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U, Zeppetelli S, Dionigi C, Sytcheva A, Herrmannsdorfer T, Dediu V, Ambrosio L. A basic approach toward the development of nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;122:3599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Domingos M, Intranuovo F, Gloria A, Gristina R, Ambrosio L, Bártolo PJ, Favia P. Improved osteoblast cell affinity on plasma-modified 3-D extruded PCL scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5997–6005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen M, Le DQ, Baatrup A, Nygaard JV, Hein S, Bjerre L, et al. Self-assembled composite matrix in a hierarchical 3-D scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2244–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin CZ, Cho JH, Choi BH, Wang LM, Kim MS, Park SR, et al. The maturity of tissue-engineered cartilage in vitro affects the repairability for osteochondral defect. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:3057–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang Z, Starly B, Sun W. Computer-aided characterization for effective mechanical properties of porous tissue scaffolds. Comput Aided Des. 2005;37:65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Gui WS, Tan WS, et al. Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng. 2005;15:113–24.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chosa E, Goto K, Totoribe K, Tajima N. Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson P, Yong R, Surman T, Rajion Z, Ranjitkar S. Application of three-dimensional computed tomography in craniofacial clinical practice and research. Aust Dent J. 2014;59(Suppl 1):174–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duan SY, Lin QC, Pang RL. Application of CT 3D reconstruction in diagnosing atlantoaxial subluxation. Chin J Traumatol. 2004;7:118–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. de Oliveira MG, Morais LE, Silva DN, de Oliveira HW, Heitz C, Gaião L. Is 3D-CT reformation using free software applicable to diagnosis of bone changes in mandibular condyles? J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:166–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saba L, Pascalis L, Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Mallarini G. Diagnostic sensitivity of multidetector-row spiral computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of type-II endoleaks and their source: comparison between axial scans and reformatting techniques. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:630–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilhelm K, Wilsmann-Theis D, Sommer T, Leutner C, Textor J, Schild H. CT angiography hemodynamically relevant to renal artery stenosis. Evaluation of AXIAL, MPR, MIP and SSD reconstruction procedures under standard investigation conditions. Rofo. 2000;172:161–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Skoworodko J, Skalski K, Cejmer W, Kwiatkowski K. Preoperative planning and post-operative estimation of vertebroplasty using CT/CAD/CAE systems. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2008;10:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yao J, Turteltaub SR, Ducheyne P. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads. Biomaterials. 2006;27:377–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saito E, Suarez-Gonzalez D, Rao RR, Stegemann JP, Murphy WL, Hollister SJ. Use of micro-computed tomography to nondestructively characterize biomineral coatings on solid freeform fabricated poly (L-lactic acid) and poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013;19:507–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hunziker EB, Driesang IMK. Functional barrier principle for growth-factor-based articular cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:320–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bose S, Darsell J, Kintner M, Hosick H, Bandyopadhyay A. Pore size and pore volume effects on alumina and TCP ceramic scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2003;23:479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Leong DT, Nah WK, Gupta A, Hutmacher DW, Woodruff MA. The osteogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived precursor cells in a 3D scaffold/matrix environment. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2008;5:319–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hutmacher DW, Cool S. Concepts of scaffold-based tissue engineering—the rationale to use solid free-form fabrication techniques. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:654–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liming Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Q., Wei, B., Guo, Y. et al. Design, construction and mechanical testing of digital 3D anatomical data-based PCL–HA bone tissue engineering scaffold. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 26, 51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5360-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5360-8

Keywords

Navigation