Game theory and discourse anaphora

• Breheny R. (2002). Pragmatic analyses of anaphoric pronouns: Do things look better in 2-d? Cambridge: RCEAL, University of Cambridge.

• Camerer C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Clark R. Games, quantification and discourse structure. In: Pietarinen A.-V. (Ed), Logic, Games and Philosophy: Foundational Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, in press.

• De Saussure F. (1916/1972). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Éditions Payot.

• Dekker P. (2004). Grounding dynamic semantics. In: Reimer M., Bezuidenhout A. (eds), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 484–502

  Google Scholar 

• Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grosz B., Joshi A., & Weinstein S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proc. 21st annual meeting of the ACL (pp. 44–50). Menlo Park, CA.

• Joshi A., & Weinstein S. (1981). Control of inference: Role of some aspects of discourse structure-centering. In Proc. international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp. 385–387

• Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers

  Google Scholar 

• Miltsakaki E. (2003). The syntax-discourse interface: Effects of the main-subordinate distinction on attention structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

• Myerson R.B. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Parikh P. (2001). The use of language. Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications

  Google Scholar 

• Parikh P. (2006). Radical semantics: A new theory of meaning. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, 349–391

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parikh P., & Clark R. (2005). The meaning of THE: A new account of definite descriptions. PA: University of Pennsylvania.

• Pietarinen A.-V. (2004). Semantic games and generalised quantifiers. Helsinki, University of Helsinki

  Google Scholar 

• Prasad R. (2003). Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to hindi. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

• Roberts C. (2004). Pronouns as definites. In: Reimer M., Bezuidenhout A. (eds), Descriptions and beyond. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 503–543

  Google Scholar 

• Rubinstein A. (1998). Modelling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press

  Google Scholar 

• Sperber D., Wilson D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed). London, Basil Blackwell

  Google Scholar 

• Stalnaker R. (1998). On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 3–19

  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Eijck J., Kamp H. (1997). Representing discourse in context. In: van Benthem J., ter Meulen A. (eds), Handbook of logic and language. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 179–237

  Google Scholar 

• Walker M., Prince E. (1996). A bilateral approach to givenness: A hearer-status algorithm and a centering algorithm. In: Fretheim T., Gundel J. (eds), Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 291–306

  Google Scholar 

Download references