[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multiple UAV Coalitions for a Search and Prosecute Mission

  • Unmanned Systems Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to carry resources in support of search and prosecute operations. Often to completely prosecute a target, UAVs may have to simultaneously attack the target with various resources with different capacities. However, the UAVs are capable of carrying only limited resources in small quantities, hence, a group of UAVs (coalition) needs to be assigned that satisfies the target resource requirement. The assigned coalition must be such that it minimizes the target prosecution delay and the size of the coalition. The problem of forming coalitions is computationally intensive due to the combinatorial nature of the problem, but for real-time applications computationally cheap solutions are required. In this paper, we propose decentralized sub-optimal (polynomial time) and decentralized optimal coalition formation algorithms that generate coalitions for a single target with low computational complexity. We compare the performance of the proposed algorithms to that of a global optimal solution for which we need to solve a centralized combinatorial optimization problem. This problem is computationally intensive because the solution has to (a) provide a coalition for each target, (b) design a sequence in which targets need to be prosecuted, and (c) take into account reduction of UAV resources with usage. To solve this problem we use the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique. Through simulations, we study the performance of the proposed algorithms in terms of mission performance, complexity of the algorithms and the time taken to form the coalition. The simulation results show that the solution provided by the proposed algorithms is close to the global optimal solution and requires far less computational resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Gerkey, B., Mataric, M.J.: A formal framework for the study of task allocation in multi-robot systems. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23(9), 939–954 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nygard, K.E., Chandler, P.R., Pachter, M.: Dynamic network flow optimization models for air vehicle resource allocation. In: Proc. of the American Control Conference, Arlington, Texas, pp. 1853–1858

  3. Schumacher, C., Chandler, P.: UAV task assignment with timing constraints via mixed-integer linear programming. In: AIAA Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois. AIAA-2004-6410 (2004)

  4. Darrah, M., Niland, W., Stolarik, B.: UAV cooperative task assignments for a SEAD mission using genetic algorithms. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado. AIAA-2006-6456 (2006)

  5. Alighanbari, M., How, J.: Robust decentralized task assignment for cooperative UAVs. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, 21–24 Aug 2006

  6. Sujit, P.B., Sinha, A., Ghose, D.: Multi-UAV task allocation using team theory. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and European Control Conference, Seville, Spain, pp. 1497–1502 (2005)

  7. Sujit, P.B., Sinha, A., Ghose, D.: Multi-UAV task allocation using negotiation. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Hakodate, Japan, (2006)

  8. Shehory, O.M.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artif. Intell. 101(12), 165200 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandholm, T., Larson, K., Andersson, M., Shehory, O., Tohme, F.: Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees. Artif. Intell. 111(12), 209238 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shehory, O.M., Sycara, K., Jha, S.: Multi-agent coordination through coalition formation. In: Rao, A., Singh, M., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, no. 1365. Intelligent Agents IV, pp. 143–154. Springer, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vig, L., Adams, J.A.: Multi-robot coalition formation. IEEE Trans Robot 22(4), 637–649 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vig, L., Adams, J.A.: Market-based multi-robot coalition formation. In: Gini, M., Voyles, R. (eds.) Proc. of the International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp. 227–236. Springer, Minneapolis (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Vig, L., Adams, J.A.: A framework for multi-robot coalition formation. In: Proc. of the Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. India (2005)

  14. Parker, L.E., Tang, F.: Building multi-robot coalitions through automated task solution synthesis. In: Proc. of the IEEE Special Issue on Multi-robot Systems, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1289–1305 (2006)

  15. Lin, J., Morse, A.S., Anderson, B.D.O.: The multi-agent rendezvous problem. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 1508–1513 (2003)

  16. Tiwari, A., Fung, J., Carson, J.M., Bhattacharya, R., Murray, R.M.: A framework for Lyapunov certificates for multi-vehicle rendezvous problems. In: Proc. of the American Control Conference, Boston, MA, pp. 5582–5587 (2004)

  17. Lin, Z., Francis, B., Maggiore, M.: Necessary and sufficient graphical conditions for formation control of unicycles. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 50(1), 121–127 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. McLain, T.W., Beard, R.W.: Coordination variables, coordination functions, and cooperative timing missions. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 28(1), 150–161 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Furukawa, T., Bourgault, F., Whyte, H.F.D., Dissanayake, G.: Dynamic allocation and control of coordinated UAVs to engage multiple targets in a time-optimal manner. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2353–2358 (2005)

  20. Notarstefano, G., Bullo, F.: Distributed consensus on enclosing shapes and minimum time rendezvous. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, California, pp. 4295–4300 (2006)

  21. Dubins, L.E.: On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature and prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am. J. Math. 79, 497–516 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kingston, D.B., Schumacher, C.J.: Time-dependent cooperative assignment. In: Proc. of the American Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, pp. 4084–4089 (2005)

  23. Eberhart, R.C., Kennedy, J.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proc. of the Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Piscataway, NJ, p. 3943 (1995)

  24. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, p. 1942–1948 (1995)

  25. Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.C.: A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, pp. 69–73 (1998)

  26. Parsopoulos, K.E., Vrahatis, M.N.: Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization. In: Natural Computing, vol. 1, pp. 235–306. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laskari, E.C., Parsopoulos, K.E., Vrahatis, M.N.: Particle swarm optimization for integer programming. In: Proc. of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, pp. 1582–1587 (2002)

  28. Nemhauser, G.L., Wolsey, L.A.: Integer programming. In: Nemhauser, G.L., Rinnoy Kan, A.H.G., Todd, M.J. (eds.) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Vol. 1: Optimization. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Papadimitriou, C.H., Steiglitz, K.: Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sujit, P.B., George, J.M., Beard, R.: Multiple UAV coalition formation. In: Proc. of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560 012, India

    Joel G. Manathara

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    P. B. Sujit

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84604, USA

    Randal W. Beard

Authors
  1. Joel G. Manathara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. B. Sujit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Randal W. Beard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. B. Sujit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manathara, J.G., Sujit, P.B. & Beard, R.W. Multiple UAV Coalitions for a Search and Prosecute Mission. J Intell Robot Syst 62, 125–158 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-010-9439-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-010-9439-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation