[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A systematic decision-making method for evaluating design alternatives of product service system based on variable precision rough set

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Product service systems (PSS) have led global manufacturers to change from providing product only to offering both product and its services as a whole. The existing decision-making methods have difficulties in evaluating design alternatives systematically during PSS conceptual design process involving cognition vagueness and related complex factors. A new systematic decision-making method is developed for judging these alternatives. PSS is divided into multiple-modules associated with function characteristics and then evaluated by using the outputs of parallel houses of quality (HoQs). HoQs can efficiently deal with customer requirements and the relationships between product and service. A variable precision rough set-based approach is proposed to evaluate these alternatives, which can flexibly handle subjectivity and vagueness during the decision-making process. An optimizing model of least squares model is used to integrate individual judgments into a consensus group judgment. A non-deterministic ranking method is developed to identify optimal alternative based on the final judgments which are obtained by using a rough weighted geometric mean method. The proposed method is validated through a real-world case study for a horizontal directional drilling machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov, K., & Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31, 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurich, J. C., Fuchs, C., & Wagenknecht, C. (2006). Life cycle oriented design of technical product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1480–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayağ, Z., & Ozdemir, R. G. (2007). An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Evans, S., et al. (2007). State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, D., Roy, R., Doultsinou, A., et al. (2009). A knowledge management framework to support product-service systems design. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(12), 1073–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordogna, G., Fedrizzi, M., & Pasi, G. (1997). A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 27, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., Arsenyan, J., & Ruan, D. (2012). Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2013). An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing, 13, 3931–3941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2012). Product-service systems engineering: State of the art and research challenges. Computers in Industry, 63(4), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. P., Chu, X. N., Sun, X. W., et al. (2014). A new product service system concept evaluation approach based on Information Axiom in a fuzzy-stochastic environment. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2014.961550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garetti, M., Rosa, P., & Terzi, S. (2012). Life cycle simulation for the design of product-service systems. Computers in Industry, 63(4), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2000). A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision-making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. X., Zeang, S., Fan, Y. S., et al. (2011). Optimal service selection and composition for service-oriented manufacturing network. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(5), 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y. C. (2003). Advanced fuzzy systems design and applications. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komoto, H., & Tomiyama, T. (2009). Systematic generation of PSS concepts using a service CAD tool. In T. Sakao & M. Lindahl (Eds.), Introduction to product/service-system design. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, K., & Ulrich, K. T. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, M. S., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, W. C. (2007). Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 324–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. C., & Wang, M. L. (2012). The optimization of maintenance service levels to support the product service system. International Journal of Production Research, 50(23), 6691–6708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Ji, Y. J., Gu, X. J., Qi, G. N., et al. (2012). Module partition process model and method of integrated service product. Computers in Industry, 63(4), 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, M., Sundin, E., & Shimomura, Y., et al. (2006). An interactive design model for service engineering of functional sales offers. In Proceedings of the international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

  • Long, H. J., Wang, L. Y., Shen, J., et al. (2013). Product service system configuration based on support vector machine considering customer perception. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5450–5468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannweiler, C., & Aurich J. C., (2011). Customer oriented configuration of product-service systems. Function thinking for value creation. In Proceedings of the 3rd CIRP international conference on industrial product service systems, May 5–6 (pp. 81–86). Braunschweig, Germany

  • Meier, H., Roy, R., & Seliger, G. (2010). Industrial product-service systems-IPS2. CIRP Annals: Manufacturing Technology, 59(2), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont, O. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product-service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, M. L., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Computer Information Science, 11(5), 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakao, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2007). Service engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakao, T., Shimomura, Y., Sundin, E., & Comstock, M. (2009). Modeling design objects in CAD system for Service/Product Engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 41(3), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W. Y., Ming, X. G., Han, Y., et al. (2013). A rough set approach for evaluating vague customer requirement of industrial product-service system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(22), 6681–6701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H. B., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y. F., et al. (2012). Evaluation method of product-service performance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(5), 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., Lindahl, M., & Comstock, M., et al. (2007). Integrated product and service engineering enabling mass customization. In Proceedings of 19th international conference on production research, Santiago.

  • Wang, P. P., Ming, X. G., et al. (2011). Modular development of product service systems. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 19(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., Elhag, T. M. S., & Hua, Z. S. (2006). A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 3055–3071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybemetics, 18(1), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, B., Kim, S., & Rhee, J. (2012). An evaluation method for designing a new product-service system. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3100–3108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(2), 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. M., Hu, D. C., Xu, Y. C., et al. (2012). A framework for design knowledge management and reuse for product-service systems in construction machinery industry. Computers in Industry, 63(4), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. F., & Chu, X. N. (2010). A new approach for conceptual design of product & maintenance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(7), 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51205242, 71101084, 51405281) and Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (No. 16111106402).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200240, People’s Republic of China

    Zaifang Zhang, Danhua Xu & Beibei Fan

  2. Laboratoire IRTES-M3M, Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard, 90010, Belfort Cedex, France

    Egon Ostrosi

  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Financial Information Technology, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China

    Li Yu

Authors
  1. Zaifang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danhua Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Egon Ostrosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Beibei Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zaifang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Xu, D., Ostrosi, E. et al. A systematic decision-making method for evaluating design alternatives of product service system based on variable precision rough set. J Intell Manuf 30, 1895–1909 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1359-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1359-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation