[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Effects of counting variances on water quality assessments: implications from four benthic diatom samples, each counted by 40 diatomists

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Water Framework Directive (EU WFD) aims to improve and maintain the water quality of lakes and rivers. Diatoms play an important role for implementing the EU WFD as they are widely used to assess water quality. To asses and use diatom-based evaluations in practice, it is essential to know and to minimize the analyst-dependent variability of the primary diatom results. We compare the counting results of benthic diatoms from two river and two lake samples as identified by 40 participants of the first German benthic diatom intercalibration exercise. Differences among participants and auditors are calculated with the Bray-Curtis distance, and similarities are graphically displayed by detrended correspondence analyses. Additionally, this study identifies the effects of counting variances on the ecological water assessment with the German PHYLIB method for implementing the EU WFD using the above dataset. Counting result differences among participants may have a significant impact on the assessed water quality. Some taxonomically problematic taxa do not have indicator values (no impact), sometimes, several taxonomic mistakes counterbalance each other during assessment (no or minor impact), and sometimes, taxonomic differences greatly influence the assessment due to highly deviating taxon abundances and/or strongly differing indicator values between mistaken taxa. Intercalibration exercises promote discussion about taxonomy, identify problematic taxa, and harmonize taxonomic concepts among diatomists. Thus, the shown analyst-induced variability of diatom counts may be reduced with an intercalibration exercise, thereby further refining the accuracy of water quality assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler S, Hübener T, Lotter A, Anderson NJ, Dressler M (2010) Diatoms relative abundance data vs. class data: implications for paleoecological reconstruction. J Environ Manag 91:1380–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrén C, Jarlman A (2008) Benthic diatoms as indicators of acidity in streams. Fundam Appl Limnol / Arch Hydrobiol 173:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee RW, Jones VJ, Flower RJ, Cameron NG, Bennion H, Carvalho L, Juggins S (2001) Diatoms. In: Smol JP, Birks HJB, Last WM (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments, vol 3, Terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 155–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett JR, Sisson DR, Smol JP, Cumming BF, Possingham HP, Buckley YM (2014) Optimizing taxonomic resolution and sampling effort to design cost-effective ecological models for environmental assessment. J Appl Ecol 51:1722–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besse-Lototskaya A, Verdonschot PFM, Sinkeldam JA (2006) Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia 566:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cemagref (1982) Etude des méthodes biologiques d’appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux.: 218. Q.E. Lyon-A.F.Bassion Rhône-Méditeranée-Corse

  • Dreßler M, Werner P, Adler S, Kahlert M, Verweij G, Schwarz A, van der Wal J, Kistenich S, Hübener T, Fazzone A, Galbiati M (2014) First German Benthic Diatom Intercalibration Exercise 2011/2012. Report, September 2014, Rostock. pp 1–203

  • Dreßler M, Verweij G, Kistenich S, Kahlert M, Werner P (2015) Applied use of taxonomy: lessons learned from the first German intercalibration exercise for benthic diatoms. Acta Bot Croat 74 doi:10.1515/botcro-2015-0017

  • European Union (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L327:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G, Werum M, Lange-Bertalot H (2011) Diatomeen im Süßwasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. Gantner, Rugell

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlert M, Albert R-L, Anttila E-L, Bengtsson R, Bigler C, Eskola T, Gälman V, Gottschalk S, Herlitz E, Jarlman A, Kasperoviciene J, Kokociński M, Luup H, Miettinen J, Paunksnyte I, Piirsoo K, Quintana I, Raunio J, Sandell B, Simola H, Sundberg I, Vilbaste S, Weckström J (2009) Harmonization is more important than experience—results of the first Nordic–Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise 2007 (stream monitoring). J Appl Phycol 21:471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlert M, Kelly M, Albert RL, Almeida SF, Bešta T, Blanco S, Coste M, Denys L, Ector L, Fránková M, Hlúbiková D, Ivanov P, Kennedy B, Marvan P, Mertens A, Miettinen J, Picinska-Fałtynowicz J, Rosebery J, Tornés E, Vilbaste S, Vogel A (2012) Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments. Hydrobiologia 695:109–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MG, Ector L (2012) Effect of streamlining taxa lists on diatom-based indices: implications for intercalibrating ecological status. Hydrobiologia 695:253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M, Lewis A (1996) Assessing the quality of water quality assessment: an analytical quality control protocol for benthic diatoms. Freshw Forum 7:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K (1997a) Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen, Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa, Teil 1 Allgemeines und Encyonema Part, Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 36. Cramer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K (1997b) Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen, Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa, Teil 2 Encyonema part., Encyonopsis und Cymbellopsis, Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 37. Cramer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K (2000) The genus Pinnularia, vol 1, Diatoms of Europe. Gantner, Ruggell

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K (2002) Cymbella, vol 3, Diatoms of Europe. Gantner, Ruggell

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K (2003) Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navicymbula, Gophocymbelloides, Afrocymbella, vol 4, Diatoms of Europe. Gantner, Ruggell

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1986–2004) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae. Band 2/1-4. Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Lange-Bertalot H (1993) 85 neue Taxa und über 100 weitere neu definierte Taxa ergänzend zur Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 27. Cramer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot H (2001) Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia, vol 2, Diatoms of Europe. Gantner, Ruggell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot H, Metzeltin D (1996) Indicators of oligotrophy: 800 taxa representative of three ecologically distinct lake types, vol 2, Iconographia diatomologica. Koeltz Scientific, Koenigstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot H, Moser G (1994) Brachysira. Monographie der Gattung. Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 29. Cramer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Levkov Z (2009) Amphora sensu lato, vol 5, Diatoms of Europe. Gantner, Rugell

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2012) Community ecology package: ordination, diversity and dissimilarities. vegan-package for R, URL: http://cran.r-project.org, http://vegan.r-forge.rproject.org/

  • Prygiel J, Carpentier P, Almeida S, Coste M, Druart J-C, Ector L, Guillard D, Honoré M-A, Iserentant R, Ledeganck P, Lalanne-Cassou C, Lesniak C, Mercier I, Moncaut P, Nazart M, Nouchet N, Peres F, Peeters V, Rimet F, Rumeau A, Sabater S, Straub F, Torrisi M, Tudesque L, Van de Vijver B, Vidal H, Vizinet J, Zydek N (2002) Determination of the biological diatom index (BDI NF T 90–354), results of an intercomparison exercise. J Appl Phycol 14:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt E (1999) Zur Revision der Gattung Gomphonema, vol 8, Iconographia Diatomologica. Gantner, Rugell

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimet F, Bouchez A (2012) Biomonitoring river diatoms: implications of taxonomic resolution. Ecol Indic 15:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Stelzer D (2011) Bewertung von Seen mit Makrophyten & Phytobenthos gemäß EG-WRRL – Anpassung des Verfahrens für natürliche und künstliche Gewässer sowie Unterstützung der Interkalibrierung Endbericht August 2011. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Augsburg. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser LAWA. Projekt-Nr. O 10.09 pp 1–161

  • Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Stelzer D, Vogel A, Gutowski A (2012) Weiterentwicklung biologischer Untersuchungsverfahren zur kohärenten Umsetzung der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie Teilvorhaben Makrophyten & Phytobenthos, Endbericht Januar 2012. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt Augsburg. Umweltbundesamt FKZ 3707 28 201 pp 1–550

  • Stevenson RJ, Smol JP (2015) Use of Algae in Ecological Assessments. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG, Kociolek JP (eds) Freshwater Algae of North America. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 921–962

  • Stevenson J, Pan Y, Van Dam H (2010) Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF (eds) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski A, Lange-Bertalot H, Metzeltin D (2000) Diatom flora of marine coasts I, vol 7, Iconographia Diatomologica. Gantner, Rugell

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks go to all 37 participants of the first German intercalibration exercise, the auditors (Gabriele Hofmann, Thomas Hübener, and Peter Pfister), and Andreas Meybohm for the administrative operation of the intercalibration exercise. We would also like to thank Francine Forrest (LimnoLogic Solutions Ltd) for reviewing the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Werner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Werner, P., Adler, S. & Dreßler, M. Effects of counting variances on water quality assessments: implications from four benthic diatom samples, each counted by 40 diatomists. J Appl Phycol 28, 2287–2297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0760-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0760-9

Keywords