[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A test on different aspects of diatom processing techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A factorial experiment was carried out in order to assess the effects of four treatment steps in diatom processing techniques (the quantity of hydrogen peroxide added to the sample, the time allowed to the digestion reaction, the use of centrifugation and the method used to settle the frustules onto the coverslip) on different aspects of the quality of the resulting microscopic slide: the concentration of organic and inorganic matter, the density, randomness and homogeneity of the frustule distribution in the slide, and the abundance of broken frustules and girdle views. The results show no significant effects of any of the experimental treatments on the proportion of broken frustules in the samples. No significant effects were related to the duration of the oxidation reaction in any of the aspects evaluated in the quality of the slides. A sample:hydrogen peroxide ratio of 1:1 for a 6-h oxidizing reaction can be used to optimize the protocol. Despite being more time consuming, the use of successive decantations instead of centrifuging is more appropriate to achieve better results. Slide quality can also be improved by leaving the coverslips to dry at room temperature in order to improve the distribution of frustules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrantes F, Gil I, Lopes C, Castro M (2005) Quantitative diatom analyses. A faster cleaning procedure. Deep Sea Res 52:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alverson AJ, Manoylov KM, Stevenson RJ (2003) Laboratory sources of error for algal community attributes during sample preparation and counting. J Appl Phycol 15:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audinot JN, Guignard C, Migeon HN, Hoffmann L (2006) Study of the mechanism of diatom cell division by means of 29Si isotope tracing. Appl Surf Sci 252:6813–6815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee RW (1973) A new method for the estimation of absolute microfossil numbers, with reference especially to diatoms. Limnol Oceanogr 18:647–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee RW, Carvalho L, Jones VJ, Flower RJ, Cameron NG, Bennion H, Juggins S (2001) Diatoms. In: Smol JP, Last W, Birks HJB (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Volume 3: Terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators. Kluwer, Dordrecht pp 155–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellinger BJ, Cocquyt C, O’ Reilly CM (2006) Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams. Hydrobiologia 573:75–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergey EA (1995) Local effects of a sedentary grazer on stream algae. Freshwat Biol 33:401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JM, Hergenrader GL, Troelstrup NH (1986) A simple, inexpensive method for cleaning diatoms. Trans Am Microsc Soc 105:152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccetti GF, Lee JJ (1979) The potential effects of energy related activities on the seasonal trajectories of epiphytic marine diatoms. Hydrobiologia 67:51–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JT, McCubbin DK, Steinitz-Kannan M (2003) Digital imagery of diatoms from the Upper Ohio River Basin and selected tributaries. Norse Sci 1:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton JW, Moss B (1966) The estimation of numbers and pigment content in epipelic algal populations. Limnol Oceanogr 11:584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ector L, Rimet F (2005) Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: an overview. In: Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot PFM, Descy JP, Park YS (eds) Modelling community structure in freshwater ecosystems. Springer, Berlin pp 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardization (2003) Water quality-Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. EN 13946. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • Flower JR (1993) Diatom preservation: experiments and observations on dissolution and breakage and fossil material. Hydrobiologia 269/270:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohn MH, Hellerman JH (1963) The taxonomy and structure of diatom populations from three eastern North American rivers using three sampling methods. Trans Am Microsc Soc 82:250–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten U, Schumann R, Rothe S, Jung I, Medlin L (2006) Temperature and light requirements for growth of two diatom species (Bacillariophyceae) isolated from an Arctic macroalga. Polar Biol 29:476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MG (1999) Progress towards quality assurance of benthic diatom and phytoplankton analyses in the UK. In: Prygiel J, Whitton BA, Bukowska J (eds) Use of algae for monitoring rivers III. Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, pp 208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc M, Gajewski K, Hamilton PB (2004) A diatom-based Holocene palaeoenvironmental record from a mid-arctic lake on Boothia Peninsula, Nunavut, Canada. Holocene 14:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe RL, Pan Y (1996) Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology. Freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego pp 705–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludes B, Coste M (1996) Diatomées et médecine légale. Applications de la recherche des diatomées au diagnostic de la submersion vitale. Editions Médicales Internationales, Cachan

  • McBride TP (1988) Preparing random distributions of diatom valves on microscope slides. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1627–1629

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchie S, Juniper SK, Knox GA (1982) Structure of a mudflat diatom community in the Avon-Heatheote estuary, New Zealand. NZ J Mar Freshwat Res 16:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen BB Jr, Afzal M, Cody WR (1978) Staining preparations for phytoplankton and periphyton. Br Phycol J 13:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rart TJ (1957) Notes on practical methods for the study of marine diatoms. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 36:593–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbe K, Vanhoutte K, Vyverman W (2000) Actinella comperei (Eunotiophycidae, Bacillariophyta): a new endemic freshwater diatom from Tasmania (Australia). Syst Geogr Pl 70:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader HJ (1974) Proposal for a standardized method for cleaning deep-sea and land-exposed marine sediments. Nova Hedw Beih 45:403–409

    Google Scholar 

  • STAR (2002) Sampling protocol and audit benthic diatoms Version 1.3. Alterra, Wageningen

  • StatSoft (2001) STATISTICA (data analysis software system) version 6

  • Stevenson RJ, Bahls LL (1999) Periphyton protocols. In: Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (eds) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition. USEPA, Washington pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds) (1999) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeger WW (1978) Epiphytic diatoms in farm ponds and experimental ponds in Bryan County, Oklahoma. Proc Oklahoma Acad Sci 58:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLandingham SL (2006) Diatom evidence for autochthonous artifact deposition in the Valsequillo region, Puebla, Mexico during the Sangamonian (sensu lato=80,000 to ca 220,000 yr BP and Illinoian (220,000 to 430,000 yr BP)). J Paleolimnol 36:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter JG, Duthie HC (2000) Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquat Ecol 34:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampella RA, Laidig KJ, Lowe RL (2007) Distribution of diatoms in relation to land use and pH in blackwater Coastal Plain streams. Environ Manage 39:369–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Duero Basin Water Agency (Confederación Hidrográfica del Duero, CHD). An anonymous reviewer is thanked for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, University of León, E-24071, León, Spain

    Saúl Blanco, Irene Álvarez & Cristina Cejudo

Authors
  1. Saúl Blanco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irene Álvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristina Cejudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saúl Blanco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanco, S., Álvarez, I. & Cejudo, C. A test on different aspects of diatom processing techniques. J Appl Phycol 20, 445–450 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-007-9292-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-007-9292-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation