A new speech signal denoising algorithm using common vector approach

• Armengot, M., Ferri, F. J., & Villanueva, W. D. (2007). Experiments about the generalization ability of common vector based methods for face recognition. In Proceedings of PRIS 2007, Madeira, pp. 129–37.

• Bobillet, W., Diversi, R., Grivel, E., Guidorzi, R., Najim, & Soverini, M., U (2007). Speech enhancement combining optimal smoothing and errors-in-variables identification of noisy AR processes. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 55, 5564–5578.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dash, T. K., & Solanki, S. S. (2017). Comparative study of speech enhancement algorithms and their effect on speech intelligibility. Second International Conference on Communication and Electronic Systems, 1, 270–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Dendrinos, M., Bakamidis, S., & Carayannis, G. (1991). Speech enhancement from noise: A regenerative approach. Speech Communications, 10(1), 45–57.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Doclo, S., & Moonen, M. (2005). On the output SNR of the speech-distortion weighted multichannel Wiener filter. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(12), 809–811.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Doclo, S., & Moonen, N. (2002). GSVD-based optimal filtering for signal and multi-microphone speech enhancement. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 50, 2230–2244.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Durak, M. H., Seke, E., & Özkan, K. (2015). Denoising speech signal using common vector approach. In 23nd signal processing and communication, conference (SIU), Malatya, pp. 1961–1964.

• Ephraim, Y., & Van Trees, H. L. (1995a). A spectrally-based signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1, 804 807.

  Google Scholar 

• Ephraim, Y., & Van Trees, H. L. (1995b). A signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 3, 251–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ephraim, Y., Van Trees, H. L., Nilsson, M., & Soli, S. (1996). Enhancement of noisy speech for the hearing impaired using the signal subspace approach. In Proceedings of the national interdisciplinary forum on hearing aid research and development, Bethesda.

• Gerkmann, T., & Hendriks, R. C. (2012). Unbiased MMSE-based noise power estimation with low complexity and low tracking delay. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20, 1383–1393.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gulmezoglu, M. B., Dzhafarov, V., & Barkana, A. (2001). The common vector approach and its relation to principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 9, 655–662.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gulmezoglu, M. B.,. Dzhafarov, V., Keskin, M., & Barkana, A. (1999). A novel approach to isolated word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 7, 620–628.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Günal, S., Ergin, S., Gülmezoglu, M. B., & Gerek, ÖN. (2006). On feature extraction for spam e-mail detection. In Multimedia content representation, classification and security (pp. 635–642). New York: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Hansen, J., & Pellom, B. (1998). An effective quality evaluation protocol for speech enhancement algorithms. Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 7, 2819–2822.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirsch, H., & Pearce, D. (2000). The Aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. In Proceedings of ISCA ITRW ASR 2000, Paris.

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2003). A generalized subspace approach for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 11(4), 334–341.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2006). Subjective comparison of speech enhancement algorithms. In IEEE proceedings of international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, ICASSP 2006.

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2007). Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Communication, 49(7), 588–601.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2008). Evaluation of objective quality measures for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16(1), 229–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jabloun, F., & Champagne, B. (2003). Incorporating the human hearing properties in the signal subspace approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 11(6), 700–708.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klatt, D. (1982). Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, ICASSP ‘82, vol. 7, pp. 1278–1281.

• Lu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2008). A geometric approach to spectral subtraction. Speech Communication, 50(6), 453–466.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2011). Estimators of the magnitude-squared spectrum and methods for incorporating SNR uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 19(5), 1123–1137.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mellahi, Y., & Hamdi, R. (2015). LPC-based formant enhancement method in Kalman filtering for speech enhancement. International Journal of Electronics and Communications (AEU), 69, 545–554.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mohammadiha, N., Gerkmann, T., & Leijon, A. (2011). A new linear MMSE filter for single channel speech enhancement based on nonnegative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE workshop applications of signal processing, audio acoustics, pp. 45–48.

• Mysore, G. J., & Smaragdis, P. (2011). A non-negative approach to semi-supervised separation of speech from noise with the use of temporal dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, pp. 17–20.

• Özkan, K., & Işık, Ş (2015). A novel multi-scale and multi-expert edge detector based on common vector approach. International Journal of Electronics and Communications (AEU). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2015.05.011.

  Google Scholar 

• Özkan, K., & Seke, E. (2015). Image denoising using common vector approach. IET Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2014.0979.

  Google Scholar 

• Paliwal, K., Wójcicki, K., & Schwerin, B. (2010). Single-channel speech enhancement using spectral subtraction in the short-time modulation domain. Speech Communication, 52(5), 450–475.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Park, S., & Choi, S. (2008). A constrained sequential EM algorithm for speech enhancement. Neural Networks, 21, 1401–1409.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Sigg, C. D., Dikk, T., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). Speech enhancement with sparse coding in learned dictionaries. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, Dallas, pp. 4758–4761.

• Wang, G., Li, C., & Dong, L. (2010). Noise estimation using mean square cross prediction error for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 57, 1489–1499.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Wang, J., Xie, X., & Kuang, J. (2018). Microphone array speech enhancement based on tensor filtering methods. China Communications, 15(4), 141–152.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wei, Q., & Xia, Y. S. (2013). A novel prewhitening subspace method for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise. In 6th international congress on image and signal processing.

• Zhang, L., Dong, W. S., Zhang, D., & Shi, G. M. (2010). Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping. Pattern Recognition, 43, 1531–1549.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references