Discourse prosody planning in native (L1) and nonnative (L2) (L1-Bengali) English: a comparative study

• Acharya, S., Mandal, D., & Kumar, S. (2011). Prosodic word boundary detection for Bangla based on empirical mode decomposition of F0 contour. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 1–5). Hsinchu, Taiwan.

• Acharya, S., Mandal, D., & Kumar, S. (2013). Prosodic word and phrase boundary detection based on F0 contour analyses using empirical mode decomposition. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 1–5). Delhi, India.

• Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bansal, R. K. (1966). The intelligibility of Indian English: Measures of the intelligibility of connected speech, and sentence and word material, presented to listeners of different nationalities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of London.

• Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology, 3(01), 255–309.

  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacharya, K. (1988). Bengali phonetic reader (Vol. 28). Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.

  Google Scholar 

• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2004). Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.

• Busa, M. G., & Urbani, M. (2011). A cross linguistic analysis of pitch range in English L1 and L2. In: Proceedings of International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 380–383). Hong Kong.

• Chaudhary, S. (2009). Foreigners and foreign languages in India: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Chen, H., Fang, W., & Tseng, C. (2016). Prosodic prompts and information planning units in continuous speech—Relative allocation and compensation of prosodic highlight. In: Proceedings of 12th Phonetic Conference of China (pp. 21–26). Tongliao, China.

• Chen, H. K. Y., & Tseng, C. Y. (2015). Information content, weighting and distribution in continuous speech prosody-A cross-genre comparison. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA (pp. 75–80). Shanghai, China.

• Chen, H. K. Y., & Wei-te Fang, C. Y. T. (2015). Advance Prosodic Indexing—Acoustic realization of prompted information projection in continuous speeches and discourses. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA (pp. 31–35). Shanghai, China.

• Chen, H. K. Y., & Wei-te Fang, C. Y. T. (2016). The convergence of perceived prosodic highlight for discourse prosody. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody (pp. 654–658). Boston.

• Chen, S. W., Wang, B., & Xu, Y. (2009). Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus. In: Proceedings of Interspeech (pp. 1007–1010). United Kingdom: Brighton.

• Den Ouden, H., Noordman, L., & Terken, J. (2009). Prosodic realizations of global and local structure and rhetorical relations in read aloud news reports. Speech Communication, 51(2), 116–129.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fujisaki, H., & Hirose, K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 5(4), 233–242.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fujisaki, H., & Ohno, S. (1995). Analysis and modeling of fundamental frequency contours of Greek utterances. In: Proceedings of EUROSPEECH (Vol. 2, pp. 985–988). Madrid, Spain.

• Fujisaki, H., Ohno, S., & Wang, C. (1998). A command-response model for F₀ contour generation in multilingual speech synthesis. In: The Third ESCA/COCOSDA Workshop (ETRW) on Speech Synthesis. Jenolan Caves House, Blue Mountains, Australia.

• Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175–204.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, B., & Lahiri, A. (1991). Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 47–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of non-native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 33(3), 251–265.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirose, K., & Fujisaki, H. (1982). Analysis and synthesis of voice fundamental frequency contours of spoken sentences. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 7, pp. 950–953). Paris, France.

• Hirschberg, J., & Grosz, B. (1992). Intonational features of local and global discourse structure. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language (pp. 441–446). Stroudsburg, PA, USA.

• Hirschberg, J., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). The intonational structuring of discourse. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 136–144). New York, USA.

• House, J. (2013). Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter) subjectivity and connectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 57–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.C., Tung, C.C., & Liu, H. H. (1998). The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Vol. 454, No. 1971, pp. 903–995).

• Lehiste, I. (1975). The phonetic structure of paragraphs. In: Proceedings of Structure and process in speech perception (pp. 195–206). Berlin: Springer.

• Lehiste, I. (1982). Some phonetic characteristics of discourse. Studia Linguistica, 36(2), 117–130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (Vol. 9). Dallas, TX: SIL international.

  Google Scholar 

• Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(3), 243–281.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, J., Jasinskaja, E., & Kolsch, U. (2006). Pitch range and pause duration as markers of discourse hierarchy: perception experiments. In: Proceedings of International Speech Communication Association (pp. 473–476). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

• Meng, H., Tseng, C. Y., Kondo, M., Harrison, A. M., & Visceglia, T. (2009). Studying L2 suprasegmental features in asian Englishes: a position paper. In: Proceedings of International Speech Communication Association (pp. 1715–1718). Brighton.

• Mondonedo, M. R. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A Guide to the Use of the international Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nariai, T., & Tanaka, K. (2008). A study of pitch patterns of Japanese English analyzed via comparative linguistic features of English and Japanese. In: Proceedings of International Speech Communication Association (pp. 776–779). Brisbane, Australia.

• Narusawa, S., Minematsu, N., Hirose, K., & Fujisaki, H. (2002). A method for automatic extraction of model parameters from fundamental frequency contours of speech. In: Proceedings of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 506–509). Orlando, Florida.

• Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pickering, L. (2004). The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), 19–43.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

• Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., & Goncalves, P. (2003). On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In: IEEE-EURASIP workshop on nonlinear signal and image processing (Vol. 3, pp. 8–11). Grado, Italy.

• Roach, P. (1998). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Silverman, K. E. A. (1987). The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge. U.K: Cambridge.

• Swerts, M. (1997). Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(1), 514–521.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tseng, C. Y. (2006). Higher level organization and discourse prosody. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (pp. 23–34). La Rochelle, France.

• Tseng, C. Y., Cheng, Y. C., & Chang, C. (2005). Sinica COSPRO and Toolkit—Corpora and platform of Mandarin Chinese fluent speech. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 23–28). Indonesia.

• Tseng, C. Y., & Su, C. Y. (2014). L2 discourse and information planning and their prosodic implicaitons. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 65–70). Phuket, Thailand.

• Tyler, A., & Davies, C. (1990). Cross-linguistic communication missteps. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 385–412.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tyler, A. E., Jefferies, A. A., & Davies, C. E. (1988). The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teacher’s spoken discourse. World Englishes, 7(2), 101–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Visceglia, T., Su, C. Y., & Tseng, C. Y. (2012). Comparison of English narrow focus production by L1 English, Beijing and Taiwan Mandarin speakers. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 47–51). Macau, China.

• Visceglia, T., Tseng, C. Y., Su, Z. Y., & Huang, C. F. (2010). Discourse prosody planning in L1 and L2 English. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 24–25). Kathmandu, Nepal.

• Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse. Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 399–420.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(01), 1–25.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xiaoli, J., Xia, W., & Aijun, L. (2009). Intonation patterns of yes-no questions for Chinese EFL learners. In: Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 47–51). Urumqi.

• Yule, G. (1980). Speakers’ topics and major paratones. Lingua, 52(1–2), 33–47.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references