[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Supporting Project-Based Learning Through the Virtual Internship Author (VIA)

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Researchers suggest that solving ill-structured problems using project-based learning approaches is one way to engender STEM learning outcomes. However, project based learning poses unique challenges in practice, including the translation of technical information, design of scenarios, facilitation of instruction, and management of student collaborations. This process is often time-consuming and inefficient for teachers. To address this issue, virtual internship author is a learning environment designed to support the design, development, and facilitation of STEM based project-based implementations. Specifically, the software is designed to scaffold (a) the instructional design process and (b) the facilitation of project-based learning. The software thus supports multiple stakeholders required for a successful project-based learning initiative, such as subject-matter experts, teachers, and students. Furthermore, the software employs unique strategies, including pre-scripted feedback, conversational agents, and latent semantic analysis to scaffold open-ended discourse during collaborative problem solving. Implications for practice are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bagley, E., & Shaffer, D. W. (2015). Learning in an urban and regional planning practicum: the view from educational ethnography. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,26(4), 369–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belland, B., Walker, A., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education. Review of Educational Research,87(2), 309–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher,18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education,98(3), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. K. W., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Chan, C. K., Lee, C. W. Y., Zou, E., et al. (2017). The effectiveness of wikis for project-based learning in different disciplines in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education,33, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deChambeau, A., & Ramlo, S. (2017). STEM high school teachers’ views of implementing PBL: An investigation using anecdote circles. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,11(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education,64, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gault, J., Leach, E., & Duey, M. (2010). Effects of business internships on job marketability: The employers’ perspective. Education & Training, 52, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,10(2), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., Foltz, P. W., Rosen, Y., Shaffer, D., Forsyth, C., & Germany, M.-L. (2018a). Challenges of assessing collaborative problem solving. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications (pp. 75–91). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Nixon, T. M., Hampton, A. J., Franklin, S. E., & Love, J. B. (2018b). Via: Using GOMS to improve authorware for a virtual internship environment. In R. D. Roscoe, S. D. Craig, & I. Douglas (Eds.), End-user considerations in educational technology design (pp. 205–216). Herschey, PA: IGA Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, S., Scheiter, K., Scherer, R., Borgonovi, F., Britt, A., Graesser, A., Kitajima, M., & Rouet, J. (2017). Adaptive problem solving: Moving towards a new assessment domain in the second cycle of PIAAC. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 156, OECD Publishing, Paris.

  • Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. C. (2017). Keep it real: The benefits of authentic tasks in contemporary learning environments. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 296–302). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,7(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2015). Problem-based learning: Conception, practice, and future. In Y. Cho, I. S. Caleon, & M. Kapur (Eds.), Authentic problem solving and learning in the 21st century (pp. 75–92). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: A systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education,24, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development,45(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Wiseman, J. G., Chan, L. K., Lu, J., Khurana, C., et al. (2014). Using online digital tools and video to support international problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,8(2), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research,87(4), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior,30, 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, H. (2010). Stuck in the pipeline: A critical review of STEM workforce literature. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nariman, N., & Chrispeels, J. (2015). PBL in the era of reform standards: Challenges and benefits perceived by teachers in one elementary school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,10(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. (2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’ beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,40(2), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (2016). The structure of lll-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educational Psychology Review,28(4), 691–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Madison, WI: Cathcart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamim, S., & Grant, M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,7(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnen, M., Loyens, S., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & Van der Mollen, H. (2017). Students’ and teachers’ experiences with the implementation of problem-based learning at a university law school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,11(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., Derous, E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Do students’ topic interest and tutors’ instructional style matter in problem-based learning? Journal of Educational Psychology,106(4), 919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (grants 0918409, 418288). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Memphis, 3798 Walker Avenue - Office 421D, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA

    Andrew A. Tawfik

  2. FedEx Institute of Technology, University of Memphis, Room 403C, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA

    Arthur Graesser

  3. FedEx Institute of Technology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA

    Jenee Love

Authors
  1. Andrew A. Tawfik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arthur Graesser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jenee Love
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Tawfik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tawfik, A.A., Graesser, A. & Love, J. Supporting Project-Based Learning Through the Virtual Internship Author (VIA). Tech Know Learn 25, 433–442 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9392-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9392-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation