[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Green is good but is usability better? Consumer reactions to environmental initiatives in e-banking services

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an emerging consensus in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature suggesting that the quest for the so-called business case for CSR should be abandoned. In the same vein, several researchers have suggested that future research should start examining not whether, but rather when CSR is likely to have strengthened, weakened or even nullified effects on organizational outcomes (e.g. Margolis et al. in Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 2007; Kiron et al. in MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(2):69–74, 2012). Using perspectives from several theoretical frameworks (Needs Theory, Technology Acceptance Theory, and Psychological Distance Theory), we contribute to the literature by empirically examining the tension between functional and sustainability attributes in a novel context, namely that of green e-banking services. The findings indicate that the positive effect of CSR on users’ attitudes towards green e-banking services is moderated by two primarily utilitarian information systems factors—namely perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness—and an important utilitarian individual difference variable—namely perceived self-efficacy with technology. Our findings are also important if interpreted within the context of the ethical decision-making literature (e.g. O’Fallon and Butterfield in J Bus Ethics 59(4):375–413, 2005), as they indicate that the linkage between moral judgment and moral outcomes is unlikely to be that straightforward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re Having Fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AGB Nielsen (2008). E-metrics online survey. http://www.iab.gr/files/1/downloads/AGB_Nielsen_e-metrics_2008.zip. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.

  • Al-Saggaf, Y., & Burmeister, O. K. (2012). Improving skill development: An exploratory study comparing a philosophical and an applied ethical analysis technique. Computer Science Education, 22(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2007). Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R., Devinney, T. M., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & Van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglind, M., & Nakata, C. (2005). Cause-related marketing: More buck than bang? Business Horizons, 48(5), 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouldstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., & Chin, W. W. (2004). Satisfying and retaining customers through independent service representatives. Decision Sciences, 35(5), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T. (2011). Capabilities in, capabilities out: Overcoming digital divides by promoting corporate citizenship and fair ICT. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 339–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, O. B., Florack, A., & Göritz, A. S. (2013). Shopping orientation and mindsets: How motivation influences consumer information processing during shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 30(9), 779–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The Myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (CUSE) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical strategies for small sample research, 2, 307–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2011). Toward a “Theoretical Toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The Myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echambadi, R., Campbell, B., & Agarwal, R. (2006). Encouraging best practice in quantitative management research: An incomplete list of opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, G., Belk, R., & Devinney, T. M. (2010). Why don’t consumers consume ethically? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 426–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes’. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace. (2012). StopGreenwash.org. www.stopgreenwash.org. Accessed March 12, 2012.

  • Greenwashing Index. (2012). Help keep advertising honest. www.greenwashingindex.com/. Accessed March 11, 2012.

  • Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 6(3), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A., Bhattacharjee, A., Reed, A., & Aquino, K. (2010). Moral identity and psychological distance: The case of adolescent parental socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feeling, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(September), 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: Market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2011). Doing well by doing good: The grand illusion. California Management Review, 53(2), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., & Velken, I. V. S. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). Wii Will Rock You! The use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353–381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y. S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing Good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R. B. (2000). Consequential utilitarianism: Addressing ethical deficiencies in the municipal landfill siting process. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 1–21.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1910). Utilitarianism liberty and representative government. London: J.M. Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?” A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, E. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (1998). EQS and LISREL examples using survey data. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interactions and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progressive Grocer. (2008). Special report: Environmental sustainability. http://www.progressivegrocer.com/progressivegrocer/research-analysis/index.jsp.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2008). The case against corporate social responsibility. Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP08-003. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1213129.

  • Reuters. (2008). Consumers put ads to green washing test. http://www.reuters.com/.

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 M3 Beta. http://www.smartpls.de. Retrieved March 10, 2011.

  • Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices—Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 516–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66, 895–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, C., Schöler, L., & Skiera, B. (2013). Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. Journal of Marketing (in press).

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. S., Hogg, G., Wilson, E., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. M. (2006). Fashion victim: The impact of fair trade concerns on clothing choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanaland, A. J. S., Lwin, M. O., & Murphy, P. E. (2011). Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D., Limayem, M., & Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals’, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsikriktsis, N. (2004). A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: A replication and extension. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türk, V., Kuhndt, M., Alakeson, V., Aldrich, T., & Von Geibler, J. (2003). The environmental and social impacts of e-banking: A case study with Barclays PLC. Case study within the project Digital Europe: E-business and sustainable development. http://www.digital-eu.org/.

  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009). Corporate dynamic transparency: The new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. W. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., Chen, A., & Huber, M. H. (2008). Green IS: Building sustainable business practices. In R. T. Watson (Ed.), Information systems. Athens: Global Text Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B, Jr, & Chandler, D. B. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. A., & Black, W. C. (1985). A motivation-based shopper typology. Journal of Retailing, 61(Spring), 78–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. J., Varadarajan, R. P., & Dacin, P. (2003). Market situation and response: The role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaoli, N., & Kwangjun, H. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Piraeus Bank at the data collection phase.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, 28 Ydras str., 11362, Athens, Greece

    George Lekakos

  2. ALBA Graduate Business School at The American College of Greece, 6-8 Xenias Street, Athens, 11528, Greece

    Pavlos Vlachos & Christos Koritos

Authors
  1. George Lekakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavlos Vlachos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christos Koritos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Lekakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lekakos, G., Vlachos, P. & Koritos, C. Green is good but is usability better? Consumer reactions to environmental initiatives in e-banking services. Ethics Inf Technol 16, 103–117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9337-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9337-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation