[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the existence of research in the field of electronic reverse auctions (eRAs), there is still a limited understanding of the determinants of auction savings that exist in this process, especially factors that can change information asymmetry during auctions. In comparison with other studies, attempts have been made to test the effects of various levels of information asymmetry through the prolongation of auctions and through changes to minimum bid amounts on auction results, as well as other modifiable variables. More than 11,000 eRAs were analysedusing data from a leading auction platform in Central Europe. The application of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test on data divided by medians of analyzed variables has been confirmed as a valid method for verifying the significance of the developed conceptual model relationships. While confirming several relations indicated by laboratory experiments and other studies, several findings to the contrary of the expected relationships were also confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bapna, R., Goes, P. A., & Gupta, A. (2001). Insights and analyses of online auctions. Communications of the ACM, 44(11), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/384150.384160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beall, S., Carter, C., Carter, P. L., Germer, T., Hendrick, T., Jap, S., et al. (2003). The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. Tempe, AZ: CAPS Research.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, C. R., Kaufmann, L., Beall, S., Carter, P. L., Hendrick, T. E., & Petersen, K. J. (2004). Reverse auctions—grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delina, R., & Grof, M. (2019). Empirical problems of savings calculation in electronic reverse auction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762019000200111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delina, R., Senderakova, L., Olejarova, R., & Macik, M. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of new participants on final price savings and process of electronic reverse auctions. In 2019 42nd international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), IEEE, Opatija, Croatia (pp. 1256–60). https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8757191.

  6. Dráb, R., Delina, R., & Štofa, T. (2018). Electronic auctions: Role of visibility settings in transparency analysis. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 22(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Earls, A. (2009). Reverse auctions provide good chemistry for Shell. Purchasing, 138(3), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elmaghraby, W. J., Katok, E., & Santamaría, N. (2012). A laboratory investigation of rank feedback in procurement auctions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European Parliament. (2014). Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance [Internet]. 094, 32014L0024.

  10. Hanak, T. (2016). Electronic reverse auctions in public construction procurement–empirical evidence from the Czech Republic. Archives of Civil Engineering, 62(3), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanák, T., & Serrat, C. (2018). Analysis of construction auctions data in slovak public procurement. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9036340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartley, J. L., Lane, M. D., & Duplaga, E. A. (2006). Exploring the barriers to the adoption of e-auctions for sourcing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haruvy, E., & Katok, E. (2013). Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production and Operations Management, 22(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01356.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins, T. G., Gravier, M. J., & Wittmann, C. M. (2010). Enhancing reverse auction use theory: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011018102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong, Y., Chen, P.-Y., Shao, B., & Liang, C. (2018). The role of auction parameters in online outsourcing platforms for service procurement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, Y., Wang, C., & Pavlou, P. A. (2016). Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jap, S. D. (2003). An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.96.18651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karabağ, O., & Tan, B. (2019). An empirical analysis of the main drivers affecting the buyer surplus in E-auctions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(11), 3435–3465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1536835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2006). Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in Internet auctions. Information Technology and Management, 7(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-9181-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koppius, O. R., van Heck, E., & Wolters, M. J. J. (2004). The importance of product representation online: Empirical results and implications for electronic markets. Decision Support Systems, 38(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00097-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lösch, A., & Lambert, J. S. (2007). E-reverse auctions revisited: An analysis of context, buyer-supplier relations and information behavior. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(4), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2007.00040.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marusteri, M., & Bacarea, V. (2010). Comparing groups for statistical differences: How to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Millet, I., Parente, D. H., Fizel, J. L., & Venkataraman, R. R. (2004). Metrics for managing online procurement auctions. Interfaces, 34(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1040.0073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mithas, S., & Jones, J. L. (2009). Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production and Operations Management, 16(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moorhouse, A. (2008). Playing the game: Effective strategies for combating reverse auctions. Velocity, 10(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2012). E-procurement management for successful electronic government systems. IGI Global.

  27. Park, J. H., Lee, J. K., & Lau, H. C. (2012). Bidder behaviors in repeated B2B procurement auctions. In Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on electronic commerce - ICEC ’12, ACM Press, Singapore, Singapore (pp. 145–152). https://doi.org/10.1145/2346536.2346563.

  28. Pavel, J., & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2013). Do E-auctions realy improve the efficiency of public procurement? The case of the Slovak municipalities. Prague Economic Papers, 22(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearcy, D. H., & Giunipero, L. C. (2006). The impact of electronic reverse auctions on purchase price reduction and governance structure: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 7(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2006.010048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pham, L., Teich, J., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2015). Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pomazalová, N. (2012). Public sector transformation processes and internet public procurement: Decision support systems. IGI Global.

  32. Raventós, P., & Zolezzi, S. (2015). Electronic tendering of pharmaceuticals and medical devices in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2569–2578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Setia, P., & Speier-Pero, C. (2015). Reverse auctions to innovate procurement processes: Effects of bid information presentation design on a supplier’s bidding outcome: Reverse auctions to innovate procurement processes. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 333–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shalev, M. E., Asbjornsen, S. (2010). Electronic reverse auctions and the public sector—Factors of success [Internet]. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Report No.: ID 1727409.

  35. Schoenherr, T., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality. Business Horizons, 50(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schrader, R. W., Schrader, J. T., & Eller, E. P. (2004). Strategic implications of reverse auctions. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 11(1–2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v11n01_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Singer, M., Konstantinidis, G., Roubik, E., & Beffermann, E. (2009). Does e-procurement save the state money? Journal of Public Procurement, 9(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-01-2009-B002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smeltzer, L. R., & Carr, A. (2002). Reverse auctions in industrial marketing and buying. Business Horizons, 45(2), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(02)00187-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smeltzer, L. R., & Carr, A. S. (2003). Electronic reverse auctions. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(6), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00257-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, A. D. (2009). The impact of e-procurement systems on customer relationship management: A multiple case study. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2(3), 314–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stoll, S., & Zöttl, G. (2017). Transparency in buyer-determined auctions: Should quality be private or public? Production and Operations Management, 26(11), 2006–2032. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Surowiecki, J. (2011). Going, going, gone: Who killed the internet auction? Wired, 19(6), 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wyld, D. C. (2011). Current research on reverse auctions: Part II-implementation issues associated with putting competitive bidding to work. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 2(4), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2011.2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yeniyurt, S., Watson, S., Carter, C. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2011). To bid or not to bid: Drivers of bidding behavior in electronic reverse auctions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03214.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This contribution was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency within the Project APVV-16-0368 “Determinants of Digital Single Market development and implementation in the field of global supply chains and in relation to changes of behavior of participants on the market” and by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the SR within the Project VEGA - 1/0794/18 “Development of methodological platform for evaluation of efficiency in the financial and non-financial sector”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radovan Dráb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Density distribution of pairwise tested relationships

Appendix: Density distribution of pairwise tested relationships

See Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Density distribution of pairwise tested relationships

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dráb, R., Štofa, T. & Delina, R. Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence. Electron Commer Res 22, 427–450 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0

Keywords

Navigation