RePOR: Mimicking humans on refactoring tasks. Are we there yet?

• Abbes M, Khomh F, Gueheneuc YG, Antoniol G (2011) An empirical study of the impact of two antipatterns, blob and spaghetti code, on program comprehension. In: 2011 15th european conf. on Software maintenance and reengineering (CSMR), pp 181–190

• Arima R, Higo Y, Kusomoto S (2018) Toward refactoring evaluation with code naturalness. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC ’18. IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196321.3196362

• Beck K, Andres C (2004) Extreme programming explained: Embrace change, 2nd edon. Addison-Wesley Professional

• Bois BD, Demeyer S, Verelst J, Mens T, Temmerman M (2006) Does god class decomposition affect comprehensibility?. In: IASTED Conf. on software engineering

• Brown WJ, Malveau RC, Brown WH, Mccormick III HW, Mowbray TJ (1998) Anti Patterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

• Cliff N (2014) Ordinal methods for behavioral data analysis. Psychology Press

• Deligiannis I, Stamelos I, Angelis L, Roumeliotis M, Shepperd M (2004) A controlled experiment investigation of an object-oriented design heuristic for maintainability. J Syst Softw 72(2):129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(03)00240-1

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fowler M (1999) Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Pearson Education, India

• Fraser G, Arcuri A (2014) A large scale evaluation of automated unit test generation using evosuite. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 24(2):8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griswold WG, Notkin D (1993) Automated assistance for program restructuring. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 2(3):228–269

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hassan AE (2009) Predicting faults using the complexity of code changes. In: 2009 IEEE 31St international conference on software engineering, pp 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070510

• Hu X, Li G, Xia X, Lo D, Jin Z (2018) Deep code comment generation. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Program Comprehension. ACM, pp 200–210

• Kataoka Y, Imai T, Andou H, Fukaya T (2002) A quantitative evaluation of maintainability enhancement by refactoring. In: 2002. Proceedings. International conference on Software maintenance. IEEE, pp 576–585

• Kim M, Zimmermann T, Nagappan N (2014) An empirical study of refactoringchallenges and benefits at microsoft. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 40(7):633–649. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2014.2318734

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Le Goues C, Dewey-Vogt M, Forrest S, Weimer W (2012) A systematic study of automated program repair: Fixing 55 out of 105 bugs for $8 each. In: 2012 34th international conference on Software engineering (ICSE). IEEE, pp 3–13

• Marinescu R (2004) Detection strategies: Metrics-based rules for detecting design flaws. In: IEEE Int’l conference on software maintenance, ICSM. IEEE Computer Society, pp 350–359

• Mens T, Tourwé T (2004) A survey of software refactoring. IEEE Trans Software Engineering 30(2):126–139

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moghadam IH, Cinneide MO (2012) Automated refactoring using design differencing. In: Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), 16th European Conference on, Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR. IEEE Computer Society, pp 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2012.15

• Moha N, Gueheneuc YG, Duchien L, Le Meur A (2010) Decor: A method for the specification and detection of code and design smells. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 36(1):20–36

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morales R, Sabane A, Musavi P, Khomh F, Chicano F, Antoniol G (2016) Finding the best compromise between design quality and testing effort during refactoring. In: 2016 IEEE 23Rd international conference on software analysis, evolution, and reengineering (SANER), vol 1, pp 24–35

• Morales R, Soh Z, Khomh F, Antoniol G, Chicano F (2017) On the use of developers’ context for automatic refactoring of software anti-patterns. J Syst Softw 128:236–251

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morales R, Chicano F, Khomh F, Antoniol G (2018) Efficient refactoring scheduling based on partial order reduction. Journal of Systems and Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.076

• Morales R, Khomh F, Antoniol G (2019) Repor: Mimiking humans on refactoring tasks. replication website. https://moar82.github.io/emserefturing/

• Moser R, Abrahamsson P, Pedrycz W, Sillitti A, Succi G (2008) A case study on the impact of refactoring on quality and productivity in an agile team. In: Balancing agility and formalism in software engineering. Springer, pp 252–266

• Murphy-Hill E, Black A (2008) Refactoring tools: Fitness for purpose. IEEE Softw 25(5):38–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murphy-Hill E, Parnin C, Black AP (2012) How we refactor, and how we know it. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 38(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.41

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Negara S, Chen N, Vakilian M, Johnson RE, Dig D (2013) A comparative study of manual and automated refactorings. In: Castagna G (ed) ECOOP 2013 – Object-oriented programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 552–576

• Opdyke WF (1992) Refactoring object-oriented frameworks. Ph.D. thesis., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

• Ouni A, Kessentini M, Sahraoui H, Inoue K, Hamdi MS (2015) Improving multi-objective code-smells correction using development history. J Syst Softw 105 (0):18–39

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palomba F, Bavota G, Penta MD, Oliveto R, Lucia AD (2014) Do they really smell bad? a study on developers’ perception of bad code smells. In: 2014 IEEE int’l conference on Software maintenance and evolution (ICSME). IEEE, pp 101–110

• Parnas DL (1994) Software aging. In: ICSE ’94: Proc. Of the 16th int’l conference on software engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 279–287

• Romano J, Kromrey JD, Coraggio J, Skowronek J, Devine L (2006) Exploring methods for evaluating group differences on the nsse and other surveys: Are the t-test and cohen’sd indices the most appropriate choices. In: Annual meeting of the southern association for institutional research

• Seng O, Stammel J, Burkhart D (2006) Search-based determination of refactorings for improving the class structure of object-oriented systems. GECCO 2006: Genetic Evol Comput Conf 1 & 2:1909–1916

  Google Scholar 

• Sharek D (2011) A useable, online nasa-tlx tool. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol 55. SAGE Publications, Sage, pp 1375–1379

  Google Scholar 

• Sheskin DJ (2003) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC Press

• Sillito J, Murphy GC, De Volder K (2008) Asking and answering questions during a programming change task. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 34(4):434–451

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Szőke G, Nagy C, Hegedűs P, Ferenc R, Gyimőthy T (2015) Do automatic refactorings improve maintainability? an industrial case study. In: 2015 IEEE International conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2015.7332494

• Turing AM (2009) Computing machinery and intelligence. In: Parsing the turing test. Springer, pp 23–65

• Vakilian M, Chen N, Negara S, Rajkumar BA, Bailey BP, Johnson RE (2012) Use, disuse, and misuse of automated refactorings. In: 2012 34th international conference on Software engineering (ICSE). IEEE, pp 233–243

• Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media

• Xing Z, Stroulia E (2006) Refactoring practice: How it is and how it should be supported-an eclipse case study. In: 2006. ICSM’06. 22nd IEEE international conference on Software maintenance. IEEE, pp 458–468

Download references