Software to Promote Young Children’s Growth in Literacy: A Comparison of Online and Offline Formats

• Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140–149.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. G. (2012). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 139–160.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101–130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. The American Psychologist, 41(10), 1059–1068.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., Verhallen, M. J. A. J., & van der Kooy-Hofland, V. A. C. (2008). Design features in living books and their effects on young children’s vocabulary. In S. B. Neuman (Ed.), Educating the other America (pp. 263–276). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47(9), 5–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clay, M. M. (1977). Reading: The patterning of complex behaviour. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 465.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Flynn, R. M., & Richert, R. A. (2015). Parents support preschoolers’ use of a novel interactive device. Infant and Child Development,. doi:10.1002/icd.1911.

  Google Scholar 

• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gee, J. (2008). Good videogames, the human mind, and good learning. In E. Wood & T. Willoughby (Eds.), Children learning in a digital world (pp. 40–63). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Gilbert, J. K., Goodwin, A. P., Compton, D. L., & Kearns, D. M. (2013). Multisyllabic word reading as a moderator of morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 34–43.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grant, A., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., Evans, M., Phillips, L., & Savage, R. (2012). Assessing the content and quality of commercially available reading software programs: Do they have the fundamental structures to promote the development of early reading skills in children? NHSA: Dialogue, 15(4), 319–342. doi:10.1080/15240754.2012.725487.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4(2), 103–147.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Karemaker, A., Pitchford, N. J., & O’Malley, C. (2010). Enhanced recognition of written words and enjoyment of reading in struggling beginner readers through whole-word multimedia software. Computers & Education, 54(1), 199–208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Segal-Drori, O. (2014). E-books as a support for young children’s language and literacy: The case of Hebrew-speaking children. Early Child Development and Care, 184(7), 998–1016.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lonigan, C. J., Schatschneider, C., Westberg, L., & The National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Identification of children’s skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 55–106). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

• Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2015). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research. doi:10.1177/1476718X15582095.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2010). Technology and young children: How 4–7 year olds perceive their own use of computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 656–664.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: “Teaching children to read” summary report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and human development Clearinghouse.

  Google Scholar 

• Olson, R., & Wise, B. (2006). Computer-based remediation for reading and related phonological disabilities. In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh-A response to C. Addison Stone’s “the metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 370–373.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palincsar, A. S., Klenk, L., Anderman, E., Parecki, A., & Wilson, A. (1991). Exploring zones of proximal development for literacy acquisition with young children identified as learning disabled. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1(3), 105–125.

  Google Scholar 

• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Piasta, S. B., Justice, S. B., Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2012). Increasing young children’s contact with print during shared reading: Longitudinal effects on literacy achievement. Child Development, 83(3), 810–820.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013 (Rep.). Retrieved http://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013.

• Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Savage, R. S., Abrami, P., Hipps, G., & Deault, L. (2009). A randomized controlled trial study of the Abracadabra reading intervention program in Grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 590–604.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Savage, R., Abrami, P. C., Piquette, N., Wood, E., Deleveaux, G., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., & Burgos, G. (2013). A (pan-Canadian) cluster randomized control effectiveness trial of the Abracadabra web-based literacy program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 310–328.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sefton-Green, J. (2006). Youth, technology, and media cultures. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 279–306.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Su, B., & Draper-Rodriguez, C. (2012). Identifying the key features in computer learning games. In Proceedings of global TIME 2012 (pp. 148–153). Monterey Bay, CA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

• Swing, E. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2008). How and what do video games teach? In T. Willoughby & E. Wood (Eds.), Children’s learning in a digital world (pp. 64–84). Oxford: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Takacs, Z., Swart, E., & Bus, A. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. doi:10.3102/0034654314566989.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What fourty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van der Kleij, F., Feskens, R., & Eggen, T. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. doi:10.3102/0034654314564881.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wild, M. (2000). Designing and evaluating an educational performance support system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 5–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Willoughby, T., & Wood, E. (2008). Children’s learning in a digital world. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Willoughby, T., Wood, E., Desjarlais, M., Williams, L., Leacy, K., & Sedore, L. (2009). Social interaction during computer-based activities: Comparisons by number of sessions, gender, school-level, gender composition of the group, and computer-child ratio. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 864–878.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yopp, H. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 696–703.

  Google Scholar 

Download references