Abstract
The allocation of financial resources in higher education has always been a hot topic of concern in academia and society. The measurement and evaluation of the allocation efficiency of higher education financial resources from the perspective of ‘Double first-class’ construction is the most important initiative to improve the quality of higher education development and promote the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind. The author constructs a resource allocation efficiency evaluation index system, including two input factors: basic expenditure and project expenditure, and four primary indicators: personnel cultivation, scientific research, international repercussions and social contribution, in addition, ten secondary culture results, results Awarded, education of students abroad, achievement transformation.etc., are considered as output factors. The three-stage Global Super Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model is applied to accurately measure and scientifically evaluate the allocation efficiency of financial resources in China's higher education. Results show that:first, the true efficiency level can be revealed by eliminating the influence of external environmental factors and random noise. Only 2.82% of universities are located on the effective frontier, indicating that there is significant room for improvement in universities' financial resource allocation capacity and fund utilization efficiency. Second, influenced by factors such as external dependence, R&D intensity, industrial structure and fiscal decentralization, the financial resources allocation efficiency is significantly overestimated, many universities rely heavily on external policy environments for financial resource allocation, and the support from the external environment for efficiency improvement in a few universities still needs to be strengthened. The third, promoting the classification evaluation of universities can meet the needs of ‘Double first-class’ construction and guarantee the development of university characteristics and diversification. The research shows that first-class universities, comprehensive universities, eastern universities have relatively mature management capabilities, and first-class universities, comprehensive universities and central universities are the most suitable for operation scale; while first-class disciplines, liberal arts universities and western universities have the most significant improvement in the efficiency. Additionally, in view of the research questions and empirical analysis results, this paper also discusses the construction of evaluation index system, the impact of environmental factors and efficiency measurement, classification evaluation, and the effectiveness and promotion of the three-stage Global Super-SBM model, presenting the supporting literature, the uniqueness of this study and the areas for further research. Finally, conclusions are summarized, and suggestions are proposed to provide theoretical guidance and methodological references for dynamic adjustments in the allocation of resources in the new round of ‘Double first-class’ construction and the strategic planning of higher education resource allocation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The dataset used and analyzed during this study is available from the first author (Jin Wang) on reasonable request.
References
Abbas, A., Haruna, H., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Núñez-Daruich, S., de la Enríquez, O. J. F., Castaño-Gonzalez, R., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Students’ evaluations of teachers and recommendation based on course structure or teaching approaches: An empirical study based on the institutional dataset of student opinion survey. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12049–12064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11119-z
Agasisti, T., Egorov, A., Zinchenko, D. I., & Leshukov, O. V. (2020). Efficiency of regional higher education systems and regional economic short-run growth: Empirical evidence from Russia. Industry and Innovation, 28, 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1738914
Agasisti, T., Yang, G., Song, Y., & Tran, C. T. (2021). Evaluating the higher education productivity of Chinese and European ‘elite’ universities using a meta-frontier approach. Scientometrics, 126, 5819–5853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03978-z
Akbari, M., Danesh, M., Moumenihelali, H., & Rezvani, A. (2022). How does Identity Theory contribute to the Continuance Use of E-learning: The mediating role of Inertia and moderating role of computer Self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6321–6345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11457-y
Aleixo, A., Leal, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2018). Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1664–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.11.010
Bertoletti, A., & Johnes, G. (2021). Efficiency in university-industry collaboration: An analysis of UK higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 126, 7679–7714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04076-w
Casu, B., & Thanassoulis, E. (2006). Evaluating cost efficiency in central administrative services in UK universities. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 34, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.020
Cheng, G. (2014). Data Envelopment Analysis: Methods and MaxDEA Software. Intellectual Property Publishing House.
Cheng, G., Lin, T., & Mu, S. H. (2008). An Evaluation of Cost Efficiency of Universities Directly under the Ministry of Education Based on SFA. Research in Higher Education of Engineering., 06, 93–97+102.
Contreras, I., & Lozano, S. (2020). Allocating additional resources to public universities. A DEA bargaining approach. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100752
Dwórznik, M., & Opolski, K. (2021). Higher Education Efficiency and Quality. Studia i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania UW. https://doi.org/10.7172/1733-9758.2021.35.4
Fang, C., Huang, B., & Luo, Y. Z. (2017). Government and Market: An Evaluation of the Efficiency of esource Allocation in Higher Education Investment-An Empirical Analysis Based on Stochastic Frontier Production Function. Journal of Macro-quality Research., 5(04), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.13948/j.cnki.hgzlyj.2017.12.007
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Finatto, C. P., Dutra, A. R. A., da Silva, C. G., Nunes, N. A., & Guerra, J. (2022). The role of universities in the inclusion of refugees in higher education and in society from the perspective of the SDGS. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-07-2021-0275
Fuentes, R., Fuster, B., & Lillo-Bañuls, A. (2016). A three-stage DEA model to evaluate learning teaching technica l efficiency: Key performance indicators and contextual variables. Expert Systems with Applications, 48, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.022
Ghasemi, N., Najafi, E., Hoseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Movahedi Sobhani, F. (2020). Assessing the performance of organizations with the hierarchical structure using data envelopment analysis: An efficiency analysis of Farhangian University. Measurement, 156, 107609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100752
Glass, J. C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D. G., & Stringer, K. (2006). A technically level playingfield profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions. European Economic Review, 50(6), 1601–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUROECOREV.2004.10.011
Horstschräer, J. (2012). University rankings in action? The importance of rankings and an excellence competition for university choice of high-ability students. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1162–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.018
Huang, J. H. (2022). Sino-Russia Comparison and the Enlightenment on the Evolution of Higher Education Investment Structure in the Transitional Period. Education Research Monthly, 01, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2022.01.010
Klumpp, M. (2019). Sisyphus Revisited: Efficiency Developments in European Universities 2011–2016 According to Ranking and Budget Data. The Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 169–219. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0094
Lazarus, F. C., & Suryasen, R. (2022). Academic library MOOC services and success scale. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 5825–5855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10864-x
Levin, H. M. (1974). Measuring efficiency in educational production. Public Finance Quarterly, 2, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114217400200101
Li, K., & Fan, Y. J. (2022). An evaluation of the scientific research efficiency of first - class universities under the goal of construction of double first - class university. Science Research Management., 43(09), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2022.09.005
Li, T., Li, Z. Y., & Liu, H. (2020). Output Efficiency of Local Government Investment in Higher Education from the Perspective of Fiscal Decentralization. Research in Educational Development., 40(21), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2020.21.009
Li, Y. X., Bian, Z. R., & Zhang, R. X. (2022). Empirical Study of Funding Inputs Efficiency for Chinese World First⁃class Universities Construction: Three⁃stage DEA⁃Tobit Based on Panel Data of 34 Universities. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 418(06), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.19681/j.cnki.jcufe.2022.06.010
Lozano, S., Hinojosa, M. A., & Mármol, A. M. (2015). Set-valued DEA production games. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 52, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.002
Luo, D. Y. (2012). A note on estimating managerial inefficiency of three-stage DEA model. Statistical Research, 29(04), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2012.04.017
Martínez-Campillo, A., & Fernández-Santos, Y. (2020). The impact of the economic crisis on the (in)efficiency of public Higher Education institutions in Southern Europe: The case of Spanish universities. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100771
Marulanda Grisales, N., & Vera Acevedo, L. D. Analysis of core competences and competitive advantages in higher education institutions: An intellectual capital approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2118636
Moyo, T., McKenna, S., & Ndebele, C. (2022). How the Teaching Development Grant was used (and the problem of common-sense understandings of teaching and learning). Journal of Education, 86, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i86a07
Moyo, T., & McKenna, S. (2021). Constraints on improving higher education teaching and learning through funding. South African Journal of Science, 117. https://doi.org/10.17159/SAJS.2021/7807
Pabón, N. D. (2014). Quality of Higher Education: A Product of Harmony, Efficiency and Solidarity in Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3582–3587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.806
Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Owusu-Ansah, C.M., Hardaker, G., Dey, S.K., & Haruna, K. (2022). SentiTAM: Sentiments centered integrated framework for mobile learning adaptability in higher education. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12705
Saimon, M., Lavicza, Z., & Dana-Picard, T. N. (2022). Enhancing the 4Cs among college students of a communication skills course in Tanzania through a project-based learning model. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6269–6285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11406-9
Sánchez-Carrillo, J. C., Cadarso, M., & Tobarra, M. Á. (2021). Embracing higher education leadership in sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126675
Shen, J. K., Feng, B. J., & Sun, X. F. (2019). A study on the influencing factors of financial resource utilization in Research universities: from the perspective of financial resource users. Journal of Higher Education Management, 13(02), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20190228.009
Shin, J. C. (2009). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education, 57, 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-008-9150-4
Solanki, H., & Virparia, P. (2021). Conceptual Machine Learning Framework for Performance-Based Resource Allocation to the Institutions: A Hybrid Approach. Smart Systems: Innovations in Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2877-1_20
Tejedor, G., Sánchez-Carracedo, F., & Segalàs, J. (2022). Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education-Introduction to a Special Issue. Sustainability, 14(17), 10530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710530
Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
Vuori, J. (2015). Making sense of institutional positioning in Finnish higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 21, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2015.1098722
Wang, D. D. (2019). Performance-based resource allocation for higher education institutions in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 65, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPS.2018.01.004
Wang, Z. J., Chang, L., & Lin, G. R. (2022). Evaluation and dynamic monitoring of double first-class construction. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 360(11), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.16750/j.adge.2022.11.006
Wang, S.M. (2011). Aspects of Theoretical and Methodological Issues of Education Economy in China’s Education Advancement and Reform. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences). (05), 5–9
Ward, J., & Ost, B. (2019). The Effect of Large-scale Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education. Education Finance and Policy, 16, 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00300
Xu, J., & Wang, X. H. (2009). Evaluating China’s Regional Higher Education Efficiency : An Empirical Study Based on DEA Mode. Research in Higher Education of Engineering., 04, 81–85.
Xue, W., Li, H., Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., & Fernández-Sánchez, G. (2021). Assessing the Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Scientific Research of HEIs China: Three Stage DEA–Malmquist Index Approach. Sustainability., 13(15), 8207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158207
Xun, Q. Q. (2018). Research on the Efficiency of Allocation of Higher Education Resources in China Based on Three-phase DEA. Ningxia Medical University.
You, L., & Kong, Q. P. (2021). Research on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Higher Education Resource Allocation Efficiency: Based on Super Efficiency DEA-Malmquist Method and Tobit Model. Education & Economy., 06, 30–37.
Yu, N. N., Dong, Y. Y., & De Jong, M. (2022). A helping hand from the government? How public research funding affects academic output in less-prestigious universities in China. Research Policy, 51(10), 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104591
Yuan, Z. G., Zhang, N. X., & Sun, J. H. (2013). A Report on Performance Evaluation Research of Colleges and Universities in 2012. Educational Research, 34(10), 55–64.
Zhang, J. X. (2005). Make for Pluralism: Classification of HEls in the United Kingdomfrom“Binaryto “Homogenization and finally to“Plural Modes in Homogenization. International and Comparative Education., 3, 66–70.
Zhang, H. B., Guo, D. C., & Zhang, H. Y. (2021). Research on the Allocation Efficiency of Science and Technology Innovation Resources in Universities under the Background of “Double First-Class.” Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (social sciences edition)., 23(01), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2457
Zhao, X. F. (2018). “input-output” efficiency of agriculture-related higher vocational education–a case from shaanxi province. Northwest A&F University.
Zhao, T. Y., Pei, R. M., & Yang, G. L. (2022). S&T resource allocation considering both performance and potential: The case of Chinese research institutes. Research Evaluation, 12. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac031
Zhou, C., & Wang, M. (2009). The Evaluation Research on Higher Education Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). International Conference on Management and Service Science, 2009, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5304303
Funding
This research was funded by Research on Management Change and Innovation of Postgraduate Education in the “Internet Plus” Era, a Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (71834001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Confict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Zhang, W., Zhao, M. et al. Efficiency of higher education financial resource allocation from the perspective of ‘double first-class’ construction: A three-stage global super slacks-based measure analysis. Educ Inf Technol 29, 12047–12075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12323-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12323-1