RemedialTutor: A blended learning platform for weak students and study its efficiency in social science learning of middle school students in India

• Ahmad, A.-H. (2010). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education. Master Thesis, Master of Management Information Systems. Universiteit Hasselt.

• Banerjee, A., Shawn, C., Esther, D. (2007). Lindenleigh remedying education: evidence from randomized experiments in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1235–1264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bayraktar, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Doctoral Dissertation, Athens: Ohio University. ISBN:0-599-86473-7.

  Google Scholar 

• Bersin and Associates. (2003). Blended Learning: What Works? http://www.e-learningguru.com/wpapers/blended_bersin.doc.

• Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Lafferty, J. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research.

• Cheung, A.C., & Slavin, R.E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Christmann, E.P., & Badgett, J.L. (2000). The comparative effectiveness of CAI on collegiate academic performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 11(2), 91–103.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kuksa, P. (2011). Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR).

• Conneau, A., Douwe, K., Holger, S., Loic, B., Bordes, A. (2017). Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. Volume 1. arXiv:1705.02364.

• Dean, P., Stahl, M., Sylwester, D., Pear, J. (2001). Effectiveness of combined delivery modalities for distance learning and resident learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 247–254.

  Google Scholar 

• DeLacey, B.J., & Leonard, D.A. (2002). Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard business school. Educational Technology and Society, 5 (2), 13–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. Research bulletin, university of central Florida. Educause Center for Applied Research, 2004 (7), 1–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Gosset, W.S. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1–25.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs (p. 2006). San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.

• Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Joy, M., Muzykantskii, B., Rawles, S., Evans, M. (2002). An infrastructure for web-based computer-assisted learning. ACM Journal of Educational Resources, 2 (4), 1–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Karaksha, A., Grant, G., Davey, A., Dukie, S. A. (2011). Development and evaluation of computer-assisted learning (CAL) teaching tools compared to the conventional didactic lecture in pharmacology education. In Proceedings of Edulearn11- international conference on education and new learning technologies (p. 3580–3589).

• Kim, W. (2007). Towards a definition and methodology for blended learning. In Proceedings of the workshop on blended learning 2007 (p. 1–8). Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

• Koedinger, K.R., McLaughlin, E.A., Heffernan, N.T. (2010). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an on-line formative assessment and tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 489–510.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kulik, J.A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In Baker, E.L., & O’Neill, H.F. (Eds.) Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9–33). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

• Lin, Y.T., Tseng, S.S., Tsai, C.J. (2002). The design and implementation of a computer-assisted learning expert system. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages, 15(1), 33–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Majumdar, M., & Saha, S.K. (2014). Automatic selection of informative sentences: the sentences that can generate multiple choice questions. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal., 6(4), 377–391.

  Google Scholar 

• Marneffe, M.C.D., & Manning, C.D. (2008). Stanford typed dependencies manual (pp. 338–345). Technical Report, Stanford University. https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies_manual.pdf.

• Mihalcea, R., & Tarau, P. (2004). TextRank: bringing order into texts. In Proceedings the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP-04).

• Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C.D., Gross, D., Miller, K. (1990). Wordnet: an online lexical database. International Journal of Lexicographics, 3(4), 235–244.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Connor, B., & Heilman, M. (2013). ARKRef: a rule-based coreference resolution system. arXiv:1310.1975.

• Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers and Education, 62, 62–71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ray, P.P. (2010). Web based e-learning in India: the cumulative views of different aspects. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 1(4), 340–352.

  Google Scholar 

• Rayne, R., & Baggott, G. (2004). Computer-based and computer assisted tests to assess procedural and conceptual knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th CAA conference. Loughborough: Loughborough University.

• Reimer, K., & Mayer, P.S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: a classroom study. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, R. (2017). Computer assisted learning – a study. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Technology (IJARET), 4(2), 102–105.

  Google Scholar 

• Shashi Rekha, M. (2013). Blended learning in India: are teachers in India ready to go blended? Technical report. India: Jain University.

  Google Scholar 

• Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., Knudsen, J., Gallagher, L. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833–878.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, D., & Malhotra, P. (2016). A comparison of computer assisted learning and practical animal experiment for undergraduate medical students in pharmacology curriculum - a questionnaire based study conducted in a medical college of North India. International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 5(6), 2581–2584.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang, Y., & Liao, H.C. (2017). Learning performance enhancement using computer-assisted language learning by collaborative learning groups. Symmetry, 2017 (9), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080141.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yapici, I., & Akbayin, H. (2012). Umit the effect of blended learning model on high school students. Biology Achievement and on Their Attitudes Towards the Internet the Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 228–237.

  Google Scholar 

Download references