Students motivation for adopting programming contests: Innovation-diffusion perspective

• Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 90–102.

  Google Scholar 

• Atkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. ACM SIGMIS Database, 28(2), 53–62.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benokraitis, V. J., Shelton, R. D., Bizot, B., Brown, R., & Martens, J. (2009). Reasons for CS decline: Preliminary evidence. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(3), 161–162.

  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacharya, A. (2018). Fewer than 5% of engineers trained in India are cut out for high-skill programming jobs. [online] Quartz. Available at: https://qz.com/964843/less-than-5-of-india-engineers-are-cut-out-for-high-skill-programming-jobs/

• Blom, A. & Saeki, H. (2011). Employability and skill set of newly graduated engineers in India. New Delhi: World Bank.

• Bloomfield, A. & Sotomayor, B. (2016). A programming contest strategy guide. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 609–614). ACM.

• Bowring, J. F. (2008a). A new paradigm for programming competitions. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 87–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bowring, J. F. (2008b). A new paradigm for programming competitions. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 87–91.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brabham, D. C. (2008). Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. First Monday, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i6.2159.

• Bui, H. Q. & Van Zyl, L. T. (2016). Talent acquisition gamified: Insights from playing the game at PwC Hungary. Lund: Lund University

• Cerny, T., & Mannova, B. (2011). Competitive and collaborative approach towards a more effective education in computer science. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 163–173.

  Google Scholar 

• Chavey, D., Monrey, T.L., Van Brackle, D., Werth, J. and Chairman-Bagert, D. (1991). Preparing a team for the ACM scholastic programming contest (panel session). In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on computer science (p. 701). ACM.

• Colkin, Eileen (2002). Cultivating next-generation IT talent, information week online (02/27/02).

• Dagienė, V. (2010). Sustaining informatics education by contests. Teaching fundamentals concepts of informatics (pp. 1–12). Berlin: Springer.

• Dagiene, V. and Skupiene, J., (2004). Learning by competitions: olympiads in informatics as a tool for training high-grade skills in programming. In Information Technology: Research and Education, 2004. ITRE 2004. 2nd International Conference on (pp. 79–83). IEEE.

• Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2006). Gender and programming contests: Mitigating exclusionary practices. Informatics in Education, 5(1), 47–62.

  Google Scholar 

• Gan, C., Kosonen, M. and Blomqvist, K. (2012), September. Knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing–it is more than motivation. In 13th European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences Limited, 380.

• Hromkovič, J. (2009). Algorithmic adventures: From knowledge to magic. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

• Iarcs.org.in. (2018). Indian computing olympiad - online programming contest - IARCS. Available at: https://www.iarcs.org.in/inoi/programming-contest.php. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.

• Jenkins, T. (2001, June). The motivation of students of programming. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 53–56). ACM.

• Jenkins, T. (2002, August). On the difficulty of learning to program. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences (Vol. 4, No. 2002, pp. 53–58).

• Kearse, I. B., & Hardnett, C. R. (2008). Computer science olympiad: Exploring computer science through competition. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 92–96.

• Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2005). Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 37(2), 83–137.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maloney, J.H., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M. and Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch (Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 367–371). ACM.

• Manzoor, S. (2001). Common mistakes in online and real-time contests. Crossroads, 7(5), 4–4.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E. (1992). Teaching for transfer of problem-solving skills to computer programming. In Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 193–206). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Minds, A. (2016). National employability report: Engineering graduates, annual report 2011. Gurgaon: Aspiring Minds.

  Google Scholar 

• Moore G. C. & Benbasat I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222.

• Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Qidwai, U., Riley, R., & El-Sayed, S. (2013). Attracting students to the computing disciplines: A case study of a robotics contest. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 520–531.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Diwakar, S., & Bose, R. (2014a). The vlab oer experience: Modeling potential-adopter student acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(4), 235–241.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., & Ramesh, M.V. (2014b). Modeling diffusion of tabletop for collaborative learning using interactive science lab simulations. In ICDCIT (pp. 333–340).

• Revilla, M. A., Manzoor, S., & Liu, R. (2008). Competitive learning in informatics: The UVa online judge experience. Olympiads in Informatics, 2, 131–148.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press (2003).

  Google Scholar 

• Shilov, N. V., & Yi, K. (2002). Engaging students with theory through acm collegiate programming contest. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 98–101.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Statistica.com. (2016). India - number of students graduated in computer science engineering stream by gender 2016 | Statistic. [online] Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/765577/india-number-of-students-graduated-in-computer-science-engineering-stream-by-gender/

• Sun, D., Wang, L. & Zou, Z. (2013). ACM ICPC in China: Learning from contests. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS) (p. 1). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp).

• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2,53–55.

• Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2008). Development and validation of a computer attitude measure for young students (CAMYS). Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2659–2667.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• The Hindu Business Line. (2017). 95% engineers in India unfit for software development jobs: study. [online] Available at: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/95-engineers-in-india-unfit-for-software-development-jobs-study/article9652211.ece

• Trotman, A., & Handley, C. (2008). Programming contest strategy. Computers & Education, 50(3), 821–837.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verdú, E., Regueras, L. M., Verdú, M. J., Leal, J. P., de Castro, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2012). A distributed system for learning programming on-line. Computers & Education, 58(1), 1–10.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verhoeff, T. (1997). The role of competitions in education (1997). Future World: Educating for the 21st Century.

• Zheng, H., Li, D., & Hou, W. (2011). Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 57–88.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references