Abstract
Learning is integral in the present dynamic environment characterized by factors, such as intense technological innovation and global economy. Thus, learning is constantly required as, for example, rapid development of technologies is both a push factor in learning requirements and a vehicle to advance the learning process. The global nature of the environment today calls for virtual learning because of convenience, time and cost factors. This research seeks to draw measures to promote virtual learning experience. The research is based on a virtual learning of a master’s level information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) course at the University of Tampere in 2016. This course was offered two times and to two sets of different student groups. A questionnaire was conducted at the mid-course stage to assess the virtual learning experience and propose the ways to improve learning process. The assessment included how well the virtual environment and pedagogy promoted qualities of learning, these are, active, constructive, collaborative, intentional, contextual, transfer and reflective learning. Excellence in learning should always be promoted and in virtual environment, there is always new opportunities because of the advances in technology. This research seeks to promote qualities of learning by considering context in terms of assessing the learning environment that is, participants’ virtual learning experience, study contents and learning technologies. Context is important in order to map the learning process that suits the learners and study contents. The results of this study include highlighting of pedagogical techniques and technological tools that fit the learners’ and study content requirements to foster learning in a virtual environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Araiza, V.M , Dörfer, C., & Castillo, R. C (2015). Academic Progress Depending on the Skills and Qualities of Learning in Students of a Business School, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – July 2015, volume 14 issue 3.
Chou, S., & Liu, C. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65–76.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ISBN 0-7619-2757-3.
EduTechWiki, 2015, Community of inquiry model, http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Community_of_inquiry_model retrieved 9.11.2017.
El Mhouti, A., Nasseh, A., Erradi, N. M., & Vasquèz, J. M. (2016). Enhancing collaborative learning in Web 2.0-based e-learning systems: a design framework for building collaborative e-learning contents. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 2351–2364.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.
Heddy, B. C., Sinatra, G. M., Seli, H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2017). Making learning meaningful: facilitating interest development and transfer in at-risk college students. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1150420.
Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall Publishing.
Kerimbayev, N. (2015). Virtual learning: Possibilities and realization. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1521–1533.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., Jochems, W. M., & van Buuren, H. (2015). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers and Education, 49, 176–192.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: SAGE.
Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265–291.
Leidner, D.E. & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa (2011). Using Open Source Software for Improving Dialog in Computer Science Education - Case Mozambique University. In Tatnall, A., Kereteletswe, O.C. & Visscher, A. (Eds.) Information Technology and Managing Quality Education. 9th IFIP WG 3.7 Conference on Information Technology in Educational Management, ITEM 2010 Kasane, Botswana, July 26-30, 2010, Revised Selected Papers.
Leidner, D.E. and Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa (2016). Digital Pedagogy for Enhanced Social Qualities, Collaborative Processes and Quality of Learning Stakeholders and Information Technology in Education IFIP TC3 Conference 2016, Portugal.
Leidner, D.E. and Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa (2015). Creative Processes in Online Collaboration – Virtual Teams Work and Learning, In Viteli, J. & Östman, A. (eds) (2015) Proceedings of ITK2015 (Tuovi 13: Interaktiivinen tekniikka koulutuksessa 2015 -konferenssin tutkijatapaamisen artikkelit). University of Tampere SIS Research Reports 15, ISSN 1799–2141, ISBN 978–951–44-9909-8. pp. 134–141.
Pashakhanlou H.A (2017). Fully integrated content analysis in international relations, International Relations, 1–19.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological Issues in Questionnaire-Based Research on Student Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 347–358.
Ruokamo, H., & Pohjolainen, S. (1998). Pedagogical Principles for Evaluation of Hypermedia-Based Learning Environments in Mathematics. JUCS –Journal of Universal Computer Science, 4(3), 292–307.
Sauro J (2015) Five Reasons To Perform a Qualitative Study, https://measuringu.com/qualitative-study/ retrieved 7.11.2017.
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 23, 9–17.
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17).
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.
Yorke, M. (2002). Academic failure: A retrospective view from non-completeing students. In M. Peelo & T. Wareham (Eds.), Failing students in higher education. Maindenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
Salinas A, Nussbaum M, Herrera O, Solarte M, Aldunate R (2016) Factors affecting the adoption of information and communication technologies in teaching, Education and Information Technologies.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). California: Sage Publications ISBN 978-1-4522-4256-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mavengere, N., Ruohonen, M. Context and user needs in virtual learning in pursuit of qualities of learning. Educ Inf Technol 23, 1607–1620 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9681-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9681-3