Abstract
Aging diversity in organizations creates potential challenges, particularly for knowledge management, skills update and skills obsolescence. Intergenerational learning (IGL) involves knowledge building, innovation and knowledge transfer between generations within an organization (Ropes 2011). Serious games refer to the use of computer games in raising awareness about educational topics, acquiring new knowledge and skills by enabling learners to engage and participate in situations that would otherwise be impossible to experience (Corti 2006). Although learning with the use of serious games is similar to traditional learning in several cognitive respects, there are noted differences in the learning style and structure of learning using serious games. The success of learning using serious games lies in the actual involvement of a participant playing the game, which in turn, creates increased cognitive links with real-life situations allowing the individual to make relevant associations, to use mnemonic strategies with the facilitation of multi-dimensional educational aids (e.g., visual, auditory). Some of the beneficial aspects of learning with the use of serious games include the elevation of several cognitive skills, which are directly or indirectly implicated in the learning process. Among them are attention and visuo-spatial abilities, memory and motor skills. However, several barriers have been noted that fall into two general categories: a) health issues (e.g., cognitive strain, headaches) and b) psychological issues (e.g., social isolation, emotional disturbances). Since the training conditions are learner-centered and highly determined by the individual, there is increased need for evaluating the learning outcomes using specific success indicators. Examples of games that are designed to facilitate IGL are scarce, while there are no examples of IGL games in most EU countries. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the current literature of theories on learning through serious games in adults and the elderly with reference to the cognitive mechanisms implicated, benefits and barriers in learning using new technologies in different generations. Secondly, this paper reviews the existence of serious games designed to facilitate IGL in Europe, as well as the characteristics of serious games in raising awareness that could be used to facilitate IGL. In doing so, specific focus is placed on the development of success indicators that determine the effectiveness of serious games on raising awareness on IGL.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing. A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. New York: Wiley.
Andrés, P., & Van der Linden, M. (2000). Age related differences in supervisory attentional system functions. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 35, 373–380.
Baily, C. (2007). Reverse intergenerational learning: A missed opportunity? AI & SOCIETY, 23(1), 111–115.
Bainbridge-Frymier, A., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What’s in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40–50.
Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Can training in a real-time strategy videogame attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 765–777.
Botwinick, J. (1967). Cognitive processes in maturity and old age. New York: Springer.
Broady, T., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2010). Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 473–485.
Charness, N. (2008). Technology as multiplier effect for an aging work force. In K. W. Schaie & R. Abeles (Eds.), Social structures and aging individuals: Continuing challenges (pp. 167–192). New York: Springer.
Charness, N., Kelley, C. L., Bosman, E. A., & Mottram, M. (2001). Word-processing training and retraining: Effects of adult age, experience, and interface. Psychology and Aging, 16, 110–127.
Corti, K. (2006). Game-based learning; a serious business application. Available at: http://www.pixelearning.com/docs/seriousgamesbusinessapplications.pdf
De Freitas, S., Levene, M. (2004). An investigation of the use of simulations and video gaming for supporting exploratory learning and developing higher-order cognitive skills. In Proceedings of the IADIS Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 12–15 December
De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46, 249–264.
Dickinson, A., Arnott, J., & Prior, S. (2007). Methods for human-computer interaction research with older people. Behaviour and Information Technology, 26, 343–352.
Dickinson, A., Eisma, R., Gregor, P., Syme, A., & Milne, S. (2005). Strategies for teaching older people to use the World Wide Web. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 3–15.
Fenske, N. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 312–316.
Garavan, T., & McGuire, D. (2001). Competencies and workplace learning: some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(4), 144–163.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–4.
Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 491–505.
Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (1999). Pedagogy in work-based contexts. In O. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (p. 18). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Hahn, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1995). Attentional flexibility and aging: You don’t need to be 20 years of age to split the beam. Psychology and Aging, 10, 597–609.
Hetzner, S., Pannese, L. (2009). E-VITA, life simulations in an intergenerational setting. Available at: http://je-lks.maieutiche.economia.unitn.it/index.php/Je- LKS_EN/article/viewFile/320/302 http://e2012.deepsilver.com/en/emergency-2012/emergency
Hubert-Wallander, B., Green, C. H., & Bavelier, D. (2010). Stretching the limits of visual attention: the case of action video games. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive Science, 2, 222–230.
Kim, K., Collins Hagedorn, M., Williamson, J., & Chapman, C. (2004). Participation in adult education and lifelong learning. U.S. Department of education, national center for education statistics. Washington: GPO.
Kimble, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and marquis conditioning and learning. East Norwalk: Appleton Century Crofts.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Laguna, K. (1997). Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 317–326.
Mahar, D., Henderson, R., & Deane, F. (1997). The effects of computer anxiety, state anxiety, and computer experience on users’ performance of computer based tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 683–692.
Marquie, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., & Huet, N. (2002). Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behavior and Information Technology, 21(4), 273–280.
McAuliffe, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2006). Object and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 406–410.
McNamara, N., & Kirakowski, J. (2008). Measuring the human element in complex technologies. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 4, 1–14.
Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1990). Attitudes and behavior: The cognitive-affective mismatch. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 86–90.
Mitchell, A., Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning. Available at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5270/1/041529.pdf
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Organizational embeddedness and occupational embeddedness across career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 336–351.
Pannese, L., & Carlesi, M. (2007). Games and learning come together to maximize effectiveness: The challenge of bridging the gap. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 438–454.
Ravitz, J., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Irvine and University of Minnesota: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California.
Ropes, D. (2011). Measuring the impact of communities of practice: a conceptual model. International Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 94–107.
Ropes, D. (2013). Intergenerational learning in organizations. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(8), 713–727.
Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46, 223–234.
Stewart, J., Bleumers, L., Looy, J., Mariën, I., All, A., Schurmans, D., Willaert, K., De Grove, F., Jacobs, A., Misuraca, G. (2013). The potential of digital games for empowerment and social inclusion of groups at risk of social and economic exclusion: Evidence and opportunity for policy. Available at: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC78777.pdf
Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games – An overview, technical report. Sweden: School of Humanities and Informatics University of Skoumlvde.
Van Woerkom, M. (2003). Critical reflection at work: Bridging individual and organisational learning. Enschede: The Netherlands, Print Partners.
Vuolle, M., Tiainen, M., Kallio, T., Vainio, T., Kulju, M., & Wigelius, H. (2008). Developing a questionnaire for measuring mobile business service experience. Amsterdam: 10th International Conference of human-Computer Interaction. doi:10.1145/1409240.1409247
Wright, P. M., McHanan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resource and sustained competitive advantage: A resource based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5, 301–326.
Worthington, V. L. Y., & Zhao, Y. (1999). Existential computer anxiety and changes in computer technology: What past research on computer anxiety has missed? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 299–315.
Ypsilanti, A., & Vivas, A. B. (2011). Ognitive ageing in older workers and its impact on lifelong learning. In european centre for the development of vocational training. In Working and ageing: Guidance and counseling for mature learners. Thessaloniki: Cedefop.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ypsilanti, A., Vivas, A.B., Räisänen, T. et al. Are serious video games something more than a game? A review on the effectiveness of serious games to facilitate intergenerational learning. Educ Inf Technol 19, 515–529 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9325-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9325-9