A review of empirical research on blended learning in teacher education programs

• Ajayi, L. (2009). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning to teach while using asynchronous discussion board. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 86–100.

  Google Scholar 

• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf.

• Altun, A., Gulbahar, Y., & Madran, O. (2008). Use of a Content Management System for Blended Learning: Perceptions of Pre-Service Teacher. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 138–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 188–196.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aspden, L., & Helm, P. (2004). Making the connection in a blended learning environment. Educational Media International, 41(3), 245.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barab, S., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 25–47.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barnett, M., Harwood, W., Keating, T., & Saam, J. (2002). Using emerging technologies to help bridge the gap between university theory and classroom practice: challenges and successes. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 299–313.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, C., & Martin, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and the first year experience: Integrating IWBs into pre-service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 68–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities: an introduction to gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 37–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2004). Applying activity theory to computer supported collaborative learning and work-based activities in corporate settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 38–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collopy, R. M. B., & Arnold, J. M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 85–101.

  Google Scholar 

• Compton, L., Davis, N., & Correia, A. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ preconceptions, misconceptions, and concerns about virtual schooling. Distance Education, 31(1), 37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1–19.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dede, C. (Ed.). (2006). Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: An institutional perspective. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream (pp. 127–148). Needham: Sloan-Consortium.

  Google Scholar 

• EL-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: a special report. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(1), 65–72.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graff, M. G. (2003). Individual differences in sense of classroom community in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 203–210.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Bonk & C. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

  Google Scholar 

• Hixon, E., & So, H. (2009). Technology’s role in field experiences for preservice teacher training. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 294–304.

  Google Scholar 

• Hobbs, K. (2009). The importance of etiquette in online virtual environments, Retrieved August, 10, 2011, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/16975393/The-Importance-of-Etiquette-in-Online-Virtual-Environments.

• Hong (2008). Blending online components into traditional instruction in pre-service teacher education: The good, the bad, and the ugly. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2).

• Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: an activity theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 77–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Macaulay, C. (1999). The Activity Checklist: A tool for representing the “space” of context. Interactions magazine, July, 27–39.

• Karasavvidis, L. (2009). Activity Theory as a theoretical framework for the study of blended learning: a case study. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning.

• Khine, M. S., & Lourdusamy, A. (2003). Blended learning approach in teacher education: combining face-to-face instruction, multimedia viewing and online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 671–675.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Korkmaz, O & Karakus, U. (2009). The Impact of Blended Learning Model on Student Attitudes Towards Geography Course and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions and Levels. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 51–63.

  Google Scholar 

• Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005). Blended learning in a teacher training course: Integrated interactive e-learning and contact learning. ReCall, 17(2), 179–196.

• Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–32). Norwood: Ablex.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, Q. (2008). Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 53–59.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lock, J. (2006). New image: online communities to facilitate teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 663–678.

  Google Scholar 

• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Retrieved August 23, 10, 2011, from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Empirical Research on Learners’ Perceptions: Interaction Equivalency Theorem in Blended Learning. EURODL, 4(07). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?article=397

• Molebash, P. (2004). Pre-service teacher perceptions of a technology-enrich methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(4), 412–432.

  Google Scholar 

• Mouzakis, C. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of a blended learning approach for ICT teacher training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 459–481.

  Google Scholar 

• Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(2), 17–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Parker, D., Robinson, L., & Hannafin, R. (2008).Blending technology and effective pedagogy in a core Course for preservice teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 49–54.

  Google Scholar 

• Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette online: from nice to necessary. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 56–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ryan, J., & Scott, A. (2008). Integrating technology into teacher education: How online discussion can be used to develop informed and critical literacy teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1635–1644.

  Google Scholar 

• Schlager, M., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Simpson, M. (2008). Attempting to realise the potential of blended learning: An initial teacher education case study. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? In Proceedings of the 2008 ascilite Conference.

• Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2005). A synthesis of new research on K-12 online learning. Naperville: Learning Point Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsai, C., Shen, P., & Tsai, M. (2011). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students’ learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 261.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Turvey, K. (2010). Pedagogical-research designs to capture the symbiotic nature of professional knowledge and learning about e-learning in initial teacher education in the UK. Computers & Education, 54(3), 783–790.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vesisenaho, M., Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Hartikainen, A., & Karkkainen, S. (2010). Blended learning with everyday technologies to activate students’ collaborative learning. Science Education International, 21(4), 272–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wang, Y., Bonk, C., Delandshere, G., & Brush, T. (2008). Mixed methods for research on blended learning in teacher education. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 4359–4361). Chesapeake: AACE.

  Google Scholar 

• Wingard, R. G. (2004). Classroom teaching changes in web-enhanced courses: a multiinstitutional study. Educause Quarterly, 27(1), 26–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Yaman, M., & Graf, D. (2010). Evaluation of an international blended learning cooperation project in biology teacher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology TOJET, 9(2), 87–96.

  Google Scholar 

• Yeh, Y., Huang, L., & Yeh, Y. (2011). Knowledge management in blended learning: effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Computers & Education, 56(1), 146–156.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Yilmaz, M. B. & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 157-164.

  Google Scholar 

• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: a literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27.

  Google Scholar 

Download references