[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Non-additivity Valuations, Cash Flows and Sales Growth

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effects of non-additivity valuations on cash flows and sales growth by using the Choquet fuzzy approach as a pooled non-additive integral. The study targets 62 parent companies with 322 subsidiaries in the Tehran stock market from 2011 to 2019. The study divides firms' assets into four categories (inventories, receivables, fixed, and long-term investments). It uses the Choquet integral's properties to determine the firms' total non-additivity values. The Choquet integral approach used in this study considers the synergy of a set's componential factors in different measurements by considering and implementing the weights and coefficients of the elements. The results indicate that while the market valuation of companies (based on non-additivity valuations) has no significant correlation with their operating cash flows, it has a positive correlation with their sales growth, which could be attributed to the synergy created by the business combination of the parent companies with their subsidiaries. Moreover, the findings show a significant correlation between sales growth and the market price-to-book ratio as a simple approach to measuring a company's performance. However, the results suggest that non-additivity valuations offer a better estimation in measuring the efficiency of companies than market price-to-book ratio-based approaches. Indeed, the valuations of companies are determined based on their abilities in using their resources compared to similar companies in the same industry when they use non-additivity valuations. These findings are expected to be very helpful for potential investors and shareholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is publicly available on the Tehran stock market.

Notes

  1. Should the order of assets’ value be different in another company, different Choquet capacities will be used. For instance, if their relationship is f(A) < f(B) < f(C), then the Choquet capacities would include µ (A, B, C), µ(B, C), and µ(B).

References

  • Abdel-Magid, M. F. (1979). Toward a better understanding of the role of measurement in accounting. Accounting Review, 1, 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-Elnaby, H., & Aref, O. (2019). The effect of accounting conservatism on investment efficiency and debt financing: Evidence from Egyptian listed companies. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 9, 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P., & Garg, S. (2020). Impact of corporate restructuring through mergers & demergers on valuation of companies: A study of indian corporate sector.

  • Ahmed, S. (2015). Determinants of the quality of disclosed earnings and value relevance across transitional Europe. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altekin, F. T., & Bukchin, Y. (2022). A multi-objective optimisation approach for exploring the cost and Makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 301, 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. T., Havens, T. C., Wagner, C., Keller, J. M., Anderson, M. F., & Wescott, D. J. (2014). Extension of the fuzzy integral for general fuzzy set-valued information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 1625–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzilli, L., & Giove, S. (2020). Multicriteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: A general approach through non-additive measures. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 43, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asay, H. S., Guggenmos, R. D., Kadous, K., Koonce, L., & Libby, R. (2022). Theory testing and process evidence in accounting experiments. The Accounting Review, 97, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, P. N. (2017). Mergers and acquisitions: A review of valuation methods.

  • Balachandran, S., & Mohanram, P. (2011). Is the decline in the value relevance of accounting driven by increased conservatism? Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 272–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. E., LI, K. & Mcclure, C. (2021). Evolution in value relevance of accounting information.

  • Basu, S., & Waymire, G. (2008). Has the importance of intangibles really grown? And if so, why? Accounting and Business Research, 38, 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov, G. (2022). Knapsack problems with dependencies through non-additive measures and Choquet Integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 301, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, I., & Schultze, W. (2018). Accounting based valuation: A simultaneous equations model for forecasting earnings to proxy for “other information.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50, 1057–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bry, X., & Casta, J.-F. (2003). Synergy modelling and financial valuation: The contribution of fuzzy integrals. In Connectionist approaches in economics and management sciences. Springer.

  • Campá García, M. (2019). Valuation of the merger of British American Tobacco & Reynolds American.

  • Canning, J. B. (1929). The economics of accountancy: A critical analysis of accounting theory. The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casta, J.-F. & Bry, X. (1998) Synergy, financial assessment and fuzzy integrals. In Proceedings of IVth meeting of the International Society for fuzzy management and economy (SIGEF), Santiago de Cuba, (pp. 17–42).

  • Casta, J.-F., Paugam, L., & Stolowy, H. (2011). Non-additivity in accounting valuation: Internally generated goodwill as an aggregation of interacting assets. European Accounting Association (EAA) 2011 annual meeting. Financial reporting session.

  • Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. Annales De L’institut Fourier, 1954, 131–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G. (1959). Forme abstraite du théoreme de capacitabilité. Annales De L’institut Fourier, 9, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & van Buskirk, A. (2003). Market valuations in the new economy: An investigation of what has changed. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custodio, C. (2014). Mergers and acquisitions accounting and the diversification discount. The Journal of Finance, 69, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daryaei, A. A., Fattahi, Y., Askarany, D., Askary, S., & Mollazamani, M. (2022). Accounting comparability, conservatism, executive compensation-performance, and information quality. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David Mutua, M. (2014). An empirical analysis of the determinants of the cash conversion cycle in Kenyan listed non-financial firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 4, 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depamphilis, D. (2019). Mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, cases, and solutions. Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerami, J., Mozaffari, M. R., Wanke, P. F., & Correa, H. L. (2022). Improving information reliability of non-radial value efficiency analysis: An additive slacks based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 298, 967–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, M., & Willett, R. J. (1977). New light on accrual, aggregation and allocation, using an axiomatic analysis of accounting numbers’ fundamental and statistical character. Abacus, 33, 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, M., & Willett, R. J. (1997). New light on accrual, aggregation and allocation, using an axiomatic analysis of accounting numbers’ fundamental and statistical character. Abacus, 33, 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., & Meyer, P. (2008). A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 766–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gynther, R. S. (1969). Some" conceptualising" on goodwill. The Accounting Review, 44, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, A., Okunev, J., & Willett, R. (1993). Accounting for intangibles: A theoretical perspective. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 3–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IJIRI, Y. (1975). Theory of accounting measurement. American Accounting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. S. A., Abdullah, S., Ali, A., Amin, F., & Hussain, F. (2019). Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute decision-making. Soft Computing, 23, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzati, N., & Menichini, A. A. (2018). A dynamic model of firm valuation. Financial Review, 53, 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., Radhakrishnan, S., & Zhang, W. (2009). Organisation capital. Abacus, 45, 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubberink, M. J. P. & Willett, R. J. (2020). The fundamental relation between firm market and accounting values is a multiplicative power law. Available at SSRN 3531319.

  • Majors, T. M. (2016). The interaction of communicating measurement uncertainty and the dark triad on managers’ reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 91, 973–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. C. (1973). Goodwill-an aggregation issue. The Accounting Review, 48, 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi, T., & Sugeno, M. (2000). Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals. Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications, 2000, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namakavarani, O. M., Daryaei, A. A., Askarany, D., & Askary, S. (2021). Audit committee characteristics and quality of financial information: The role of the internal information environment and political connections. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14, 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassirzadeh, F., Askarany, D., & Arefiasl, S. (2022). Accounting conservatism and earnings quality. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. A. (2020). Integrating financial, social and environmental accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11, 745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoară, M. (2019). The adjusted net asset, a patrimonial method to determine the value of economic entity. ISSN 1843-682X, 25, 69.

  • Nyamasege, D., Okibo, W. B., Nyang’au, A. S., Obasi Sang’ania, P., Omosa, H. & Momanyi, C. (2014). Effect of asset structure on value of a firm: A case of companies listed in Nairobi securities exchange.

  • Özdilek, U. (2020). Property valuation based on Choquet integral. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 39, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, W. A., & Littleton, A. C. (1970). An introduction to corporate accounting standards. American Accounting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paugam, L., Casta, J. F., & Stolowy, H. (2018). Non-additivity in accounting valuation: Theory and applications. Abacus, 54, 381–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. Y., Guermat, C., & Devi, S. (2018). Why do firms invest in accounts receivable? An empirical investigation of the Malaysian manufacturing sector. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perederieieva, O., Raith, A., & Schmidt, M. (2018). Non-additive shortest path in the context of traffic assignment. European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragas, M. W., & Culp, R. (2021). Financial statements and valuation essentials: A primer. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas, R., & Kumar, J. (2014). Effect of corporate restructuring on shareholder’s value in the information technology sector. International Review of Research in Emerging Markets and the Global Economy, 1, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, S., Gal, G., Mock, T. J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2012). A measurement theory perspective on business measurement. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 9, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, R. I., Mohammedali, M. N., & Abbas, J. (2020). An application of non-additive measures and corresponding integrals in tourism management. Baghdad Science Journal, 17, 172–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarala, N., & Jothi, S. (2016). An application of Choquet and Sugeno integrals. International Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Technology, 2, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiadharma, S., & Machali, M. (2017). The effect of asset structure and firm size on firm value with capital structure as intervening variable. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 6, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandiz, M. T., Zadeh, F. N., & Askarany, D. (2022). The interactive effect of ownership structure on the relationship between annual board report readability and stock price crash risk. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, C. J., Thomas, W. B., & Han, Y. I. (2010). Value relevance of FAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 85, 1375–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1958). Problems and methods of psychophysics. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H., & Liu, S. (2019). Distribution-based approaches to deriving weights from dual hesitant fuzzy information. Symmetry, 11, 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno, M. (1977). Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: A survey. In M. M. Gupta, G. N. Saridis, & B. R. Gaines (Eds.), Fuzzy automata and decision processes (pp. 89–102). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno, M. (1993). Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals—a survey. Readings in fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torra, V. (2014). Use and applications of non-additive measures and integrals. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., & Sugeno, M. (2020). On the f-divergence for discrete non-additive measures. Information Sciences, 512, 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehmanen, P. (2013). Measurement of assets and the classical measurement theory. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja, 2, 130–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walaa Wahid, E. (2017). IFRS related party transactions disclosure and firm valuation in the United Arab Emirates emerging market. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, R. J. (1987). An axiomatic theory of accounting measurement. Accounting and Business Research, 17, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Science, 45, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. M. (1927). The valuation of intangibles. Accounting Review, 1, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K. (2013). Does recognition versus disclosure affect value relevance? Evidence from pension accounting. The Accounting Review, 88, 1095–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, and preparing original draft: ME and FN. Writing—review and editing and revision, and administration: DA and FN. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Nassirzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest regarding this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eghbal, M., Nassirzadeh, F. & Askarany, D. The Relationship Between Non-additivity Valuations, Cash Flows and Sales Growth. Comput Econ 64, 429–459 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x

Keywords