Lessons from building a Persian written corpus: Peykare

• Al-Sulaiti, L., & Atwell, E. (2006). The design of a corpus of contemporary Arabic. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(2), 135–171.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Assi, M., & Abdolhosseini, M. H. (2000). Grammatical tagging of a Persian corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 5(1), 69–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Atkins, S., Clear, J., & Ostler, N. (1992). Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7(1), 1–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Biber, D. (1992). Representativeness in corpus design. In G. Sampson & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening discipline (pp. 174–197). New York, USA: Continuum.

  Google Scholar 

• Biber, D. (1993). Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 221–241.

  Google Scholar 

• Bijankhan, M. et al. (1994). Farsi spoken language database: FARSDAT. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on speech sciences and technology (ICSST), Perth (Vol. 2, pp. 826–829).

• Bijankhan, M. et al. (2003). TFARSDAT: Telephone Farsi spoken language database. EuroSpeech, Geneva (3), pp. 1525–1528.

• Bijankhan, M. et al. (2004). The large Persian speech database. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Persian language and computer, the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (pp. 149–150).

• Buckwalter, T. (2005). Issues in Arabic orthography and morphology analysis. In Proceedings of the workshop on computational approaches to arabic script-based languages in conjunction with COLING 2004, Switzerland.

• Cloeren, J. (1999). Tagsets. In H. V. Halteren (Ed.), Syntactic wordclass tagging. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Douglas, F. M. (2003). The Scottish corpus of texts and speech: Problems of corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(1), 23–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ghayoomi, M., & Momtazi, S. (2009). Challenges in developing Persian corpora from online resources. In Proceedingss of IEEE international conference on Asian language processing, Singapore.

• Ghayoomi, M., Momtazi, S., & Bijankhan, M. (2010). A study of corpus development for Persian. International Journal on Asian Language Processing, 20(1), 17–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Ghomeshi, J. (1996). Projection and inflection: A study of persian phrase structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

• Hajič, J. (2000). Morphological tagging: Data vs. dictionaries. In Proceedings of the 6th applied natural language processing conference, Washington (pp. 94–101).

• Hearst, M. A. (1991). Noun homograph disambiguation using local context in large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the University of Waterloo, Center for the new OED and text research, Oxford.

• Hodge, C. T. (1957). Some aspects of Persian style. Language, 33(3) Part 1, 355–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Hudson, R. (1994). About 37% word-tokens are nouns. Language, 70(2), 331–339.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hussain, S., & Gul, S. (2005). Road map for localization. Lahore, Pakistan: Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Kawata, Y. (2001). Towards a reference tagset for Japanese. In Proceedings of the 6th natural language processing Pacific rim symposium post-conference workshop, Tokyo (pp. 55–62).

• Khoja, S., Garside, R., & Knowles, G. (2001). A tagset for the morpho-syntactic tagging of Arabic. Lancaster University, Computing Department. http://archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/mdh/arabic/CL2001.pdf.

• Kralik, J., & Šulc, M. (2005). The representativeness of Czeck corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(3), 357–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kučera, K. (2002). The Czech national corpus: Principles, design, and results. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 245–247.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leech, G. (2002). The importance of reference corpora. Donostia, 2002-10-24/25. www.corpus4u.org/upload/forum/2005060301260076.pdf.

• Leech, G., & Wilson, A. (1999). Standards for tagsets. In H. V. Halteren (Ed.), Syntactic wordclass tagging (pp. 55–81). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge: The MIT press.

  Google Scholar 

• Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. http://citeseer.comp.nus.edu.sg/587575.html.

• Megerdoomian, K. (2000). Persian computational morphology: A unification-based approach. NMSU, CRL, Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science (MCCS-00-320).

• Mosavi-Miangah, T. (2006). Automatic lemmatization of Persian words: Project report. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 13(1), 1–15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muthusamy, Y. K., Cole, R. A., & Oshika, B. T. (1992). The OGI multi-language telephone Speech Corpus. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on spoken language processing (ICSLP), Banff (pp. 895–898).

• Samvelian, P. (2007). A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 605–645.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sheykhzadegan, J., & Bijankhan, M. (2006). The speech databases of Persian language. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Persian language and computing, the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (pp. 247–261).

• Sinclair, J. (1987). Corpus creation. In G. Sampson and D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening discipline, 2004 (pp. 78–84). New York: Continuum.

• Voutilainen, A. (1999). A short history of tagging. In H. V. Halteren (Ed.), Syntactic wordclass tagging (pp. 9–19). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

Download references