In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?

• Alexander, J. (2007). Environmental sustainability versus profit maximization: Overcoming systemic constraints on implementing normatively preferable alternatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 155–162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639–659.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Balmer, J., Powell, S., & Greyser, S. (2011). Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 1–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 269–290.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 717–736.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Black, L. D., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2004). The five capabilities of socially responsible companies. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 125–144.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blume, L. E., & Easley, D. (2008). Rationality. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• BMU (German Federal Ministry for the Environment). (2002). Sustainability management in business enterprises. Concepts and instruments for sustainable organisation development. Bonn: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety; Federation of German Industries; Centre for Sustainability Management.

  Google Scholar 

• Boatright, J. R. (1996). Business ethics and the theory of the firm. American Business Law Journal, 34(2), 217–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bowen, F. E. (2002). Does size matter? Organizational slack and visibility as alternative explanations for environmental responsiveness. Business and Society, 41(1), 118–124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Branco, M. C., Eugénio, T., & Ribeiro, J. (2008). Environmental disclosure in response to public perception of environmental threats: The case of co-incineration in Portugal. Journal of Communication Management, 12(2), 136–151.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bréchet, T., Camacho, C., & Veliov, V. M. (2014). Model predictive control, the economy, and the issue of global warming. Annals of Operations Research, 220(1), 25–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brignall, S. (2002). The unbalanced scorecard: a social and environmental critique. Proceedings of the PMA 2002: Research and action, Boston, MA, pp. 85–92.

• Bronn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative. Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 91–109.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Han-Lin, L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burritt, R., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting. Links between business actors and environmental management Accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(2), 39–50.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business and Society, 50(2), 233–265.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, D. (2003). Intra- and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: Evidence for legitimacy theory? Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6), 357–371.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total SA’s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 33–62.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark, C. E. (2000). Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis. Corporate Reputation Review, 26(3), 363–380.

  Google Scholar 

• Collison, D., Clark, R., Barbour, J., Buck, A., Fraser, R., Lyon, B., et al. (2003). Environmental performance measurement through accounting systems: A survey of UK practice. In M. Bennett, P. M. Rikhardsson, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Environmental management accounting. Purpose and progress (pp. 189–232). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Commons, J. R. (1934): Institutional economics: Its place in political economy. New York.

• Commons, J. R. (1936). Institutional economics. American Economic Review, 26, 237–249.

  Google Scholar 

• Consolandi, C., Innocenti, A., & Vercelli, A. (2009). CSR, rationality and the ethical preferences of investors in a laboratory experiment. Research in Economics, 63(4), 242–252.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cordeiro, J. J., & Tewari, M. (2015). Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSR: A stakeholder theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 833–849.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Science, 38(2–3), 91–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 18(1), 25–38.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Du, X. (2014). How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics.

• Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work. Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Sheffield, San Francisco: Greenleaf Pub.; Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2003). Making the business case for sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 79–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eugénio, T. P., Lourenço, I. C., & Morais, A. I. (2013). Sustainability strategies of the company TimorL: Extending the applicability of legitimacy theory. Management of Environmental Quality, 24(5), 570–582.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• European Commission. (2004). ABC of the main instruments of corporate social responsibility. Brussels: European Commission.

  Google Scholar 

• Figge, F. (2005). Value-based environmental management: From environmental shareholder value to environmental option value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(1), 19–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In R. Chadwick & D. Schroeder (Eds.), 2002. London: Applied Ethics, Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gattiker, T. F., & Carter, C. R. (2010). Understanding project champions’ ability to gain intra-organizational commitment for environmental projects. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 72–85.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hahn, T., & Scheermesser, M. (2006). Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 150–165.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heede, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers. Climatic Change, 122(1–2), 229–241.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henri, J.-F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hockerts, K. (2014). A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, doi:10.1002/bse.1813.

  Google Scholar 

• Hogan, J., & Lodhia, S. (2011). Sustainability reporting and reputation risk management: An Australian case study. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 19(3), 267–287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management. New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1–2), 55–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hörisch, J. (2013). Combating climate change through organisational innovation: An empirical analysis of internal emission trading schemes. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 569–582.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hörisch, J., Johnson, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Implementation of sustainability management and company size: A knowledge-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, doi:10.002/bse.1844.

  Google Scholar 

• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2008). Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Available at: www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment–report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf. Retrieved from 20 Mar 2015.

• IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2008). Summary statistics for globally threatened species. Available at www.iucnredlist.org/static/stats. Retrieved from 20 Mar 2015.

• Jeswani, H. K., Wehrmeyer, W., & Mulugetta, Y. (2008). How warm is the corporate response to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 46–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kim, Y., & Kim, S.-Y. (2010). The influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 485–500.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105–116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 69–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279–291.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• KPMG (2014). Corporate sustainability. A progress report, available at: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/corporate-sustainability-v2.pdf. Retrieved from 08 July 2015.

• Lacy, P., Cooper, T., Hayward, R., & Neuberger, L. (2010). A new area of sustainability. CEO reflections on progress to date, challenges ahead and the impact of the journey toward a sustainable economy. Accenture.

• Länsiluoto, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2010). Greening the balanced scorecard. Business Horizons, 53(4), 385–395.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leck, H., & Simon, D. (2013). Fostering multiscalar collaboration and co-operation for effective governance of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies, 50(6), 1221–1238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, M.-D. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 281–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Machlup, F. (1967). Theories of the firm: Marginalist, behavioral, managerial. The American Economic Review, 57(1), 1–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New York: Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099–1104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Michelon, G. (2011). Sustainability disclosure and reputation: A comparative study. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(2), 79–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Milanés-Montero, P., & Pérez-Calderón, E. (2011). Corporate environmental disclosure and legitimacy theory. A European perspective. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10(12), 1883–1891.

  Google Scholar 

• Nishitani, K., & Kokubu, K. (2012). Why does the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions enhance firm value? The case of Japanese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(8), 517–529.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Norberg-Hodge, H. (2006). Sustainable economies-local or global? In Marco Keiner (Ed.), The future of sustainability (pp. 99–115). Dordrecht: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• OECD. (2012). Demographic Change and Local Development. Paris: OECD.

  Google Scholar 

• Pellegrino, C., & Lodhia, S. (2012). Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 68–82.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2007). Multinational corporations and emissions trading: Strategic responses to new institutional constraints. Business, climate change and emissions trading. European Management Journal, 25(6), 441–452.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

  Google Scholar 

• Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2012). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs’ social strategies in emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 18(1), 1–17.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.

  Google Scholar 

• Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 163–176.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal on Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schaltegger, S., Windolph, S. E., Harms, D., & Hörisch, J. (2014). Corporate sustainability in international comparison. State of practice, opportunities and challenges. Heidelberg: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 239–253.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sen, A. (2008). Rational Behaviour. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shrivastava, P., & Hart, S. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4, 154–165.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sridhar, K. (2012). The Relationship between the adoption of triple bottom line and enhanced corporate reputation and legitimacy. Corporate Reputation Review, 15(2), 69–87.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steger, U., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Salzmann, O. (2007). The economic foundations of corporate sustainability. Corporate Governance, 7, 162–177.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs. socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23(6), 628–647.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• United Nations. (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro.

• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2010). Human development report 2010. 20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations. Pathways to human development, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/270/hdr_2010_en_complete_reprint.pdf. Retrieved from 20th June 2015.

• van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 107–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Zyl, A. S. (2013). The importance of stakeholder engagement in managing corporate reputations. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 46–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• von Weizsäcker, E. U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2009). Factor five. Transforming the global economy through 80 % improvements in resource productivity, Earthscan. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Vriend, N. J. (1996). Rational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 29(2), 263–285.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, M. (2006). Achieving environmental-economic sustainability through corporate environmental strategies: Empirical evidence on environmental shareholder value. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 183–206). Dordrecht: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang, L., Li, S., & Gao, S. (2014). Do greenhouse gas emissions affect financial performance? An empirical examination of Australian public firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 505–519.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our common future. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm#I. Retrieved from 27 July 2015.

• White, A. L. (2004). Lost in Transition? The future of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship., 16, 19–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Windolph, S. E., Harms, D., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Motivations for corporate sustainability management: Contrasting survey results and implementation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 272–285.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Woods, I. (2005). Investors look for corporate social responsibility. Civil Engineers Australia, 77(3), 8–11.

  Google Scholar 

• WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). (2010). Living planet report 2010. Gland: WWF.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, L., & Wu, J. (2010). Seven design principles for promoting scholars’ participation in combating desertification. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 17(2), 109–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, Q., Cordeiro, J., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: Investigating the ISO 9000: Environmental management system implementation linkage. Journal of Environmental Management, 114(January), 232–242.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references