A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice

• Abreu R., David F., Crowther D. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in Portugal Empirical Evidence of Corporate Behavior. Corporate Governance 5(5):3–18

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aupperle, E., A. Carroll and Hatfield: 1983, ‘Instrument Development and Application in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of management Proceedings (August) 369–373.

• Brammer S., Millington A. (2003). The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement. Journal of Business Ethics 45:213–226

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brenner, S. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research’, IABS Proceedings 449–467.

• Brickson S. (2007). Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value. Academy of Management Review 32(3):864–888

  Google Scholar 

• Carroll A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4):497–505

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll A. (1991). The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34:39–48

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business and Society 38(3):268–295

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll A., Buchholtz A. (2003). Business and Society, Ethics and Stakeholders Management, 5th Edition. Thomson, Mason (Ohio)

  Google Scholar 

• Clarkson M. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review 20(1):92–117

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davenport K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It. Business & Society 20(2):210–219

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davis K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Corporate Social Responsibilities?. California Management Review 2:70–76

  Google Scholar 

• DeFillipi, R. J.: 1982, ‘Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Corporate Social Involvement Research’, in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Connecticut).

• De Madariaga G., Valor C. (2007). Stakeholders Management Systems: Empirical Insights from Relationship Marketing and Market Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 71:425–439

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Doh J., Guay T. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy and NGO Activism in Europe and the US: An Institutional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies 43:47–66

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Donaldson T. (1982). Corporations and Morality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ

  Google Scholar 

• Donaldson T., Dunfee T. (1994). Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Academy of Management Review 19:252–284

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Foster D., Jonker J. (2005). Stakeholder Relationships: The Dialogue of Engagement. Corporate Governance 5(5):51–57

  Google Scholar 

• Frankental P. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility- A PR Invention. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6(1):18–23

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Frederick W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society 33(2):150–164

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Freeman E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston.

  Google Scholar 

• Freeman E., Reed L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review 15(3):88–106

  Google Scholar 

• Freeman E., Philips R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3):331–349

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Friedman M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  Google Scholar 

• Galbreath J. (2006). Does Primary Stakeholder Management Positively Affect the Bottom Line?. Management Decision 44(9):1106–1121

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garriga E., Mele D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53:51–71

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hawkins D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Balancing Tomorrow’s Sustainability And Today’s Profitability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Hemphill T. (2004). Corporate Citizenship: The Case for a New Corporate Governance Model. Business and Society Review 109(3):339–361

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jamali D., Mirshak R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in A Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics 72: 243–262

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones M. (1983). An Integrating Framework for Research in Business and Society: A Step Toward the Elusive Paradigm. Academy of Management Review 8:559–564

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jonker J., Foster D. (2002). Stakeholder Excellence: Framing the Evolution and Complexity of a Stakeholder Perspective of the Firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9:187–195

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kakabase N., Rozuel C., Lee-Davies L. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Approach: A Conceptual Review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1(4):277–302

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knox S., Maklan S., French P. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Program Reporting Across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 61:7–28

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, L.: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility and Economic Performance: An Empirical Examination of Corporate Profiles’, Un-published PhD Dissertation, US International University, San Diego.

• Longo M., Mura M., Bonoli A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs. Corporate Governance 5(4):28–42

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maignan I., Ferrell O., Ferrell L. (2005). A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing 29(9/10):956–977

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Margolis J., Walsh J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Revisiting Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48:268–305

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Matten D., Crane A., Chapple W. (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45:109–120

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meehan J., Meehan K., Richards A. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: The 3C-SR Model. International Journal of Social Economics 33(5/6):386–398

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell K., Agle R., Wood D. (1997). Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neville, B., S. Bell and G. Whitwell: 2004, ‘Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Toward An Actionable Tool for The Management of Stakeholders’, The Academy of Management Conference, 2004, Best Paper Proceedings (New Orleans).

• Norman W., MacDonald C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of Triple Bottom Line. Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2):243–262

  Google Scholar 

• Novak M. (1996). Business a Calling: Work and the Examined Life. The Free Press, New York, NY

  Google Scholar 

• Oliver C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145–171

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Papasolomou-Doukakis I., Krambia-Kapardis M., Katsioloudes M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Way Forward? Maybe Not!. European Business Review 17(3):263–279

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Phillips R., Freeman E., Wicks C. (2003). What Stakeholder Theory Is Not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4):479–502

  Google Scholar 

• Post J. (1978). Corporate Behavior and Change. Reston Publishing Company, Virginia

  Google Scholar 

• Post E., Preston E., Sachs S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review 45(1):6–28

  Google Scholar 

• Pratima B. (2002). The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development. Academy of Management Executive 16(2):122–132

  Google Scholar 

• Preston L., Post J. (1975). Private Management and Public Policy. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  Google Scholar 

• Shepard J., Betz M., O’Connell L. (1997). The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1001–1010

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simmons J. (2004). Managing in the Post-Managerialist Era: Towards Socially Responsible Corporate Governance. Management Decision 32(3/4): 601–611

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Snider J., Hill R., Martin D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 48:175–187

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Solomon R. C. (1994). The New World of Business: Ethics and Free Enterprise in the Global Nineties. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., USA

  Google Scholar 

• Spiller R. (2000). Ethical Business and Investment: A Model for Business and Society. Journal of Business Ethics 27:149–160

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Uhlaner L., van Goor-Balk A., Masurel E. (2004). Family Business and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Sample of Dutch Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(2):186–194

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vos J., Achterkamp M. (2006). Stakeholder Identification in Innovation Projects: Going Beyond Classification. European Journal of Innovation Management 9(2):161–178

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Votaw, D.: 1973, ‘Genius Becomes Rare’, in D. Votaw and S. Sethi (eds.), The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values Vs. Contemporary Problems (Prentice Hall).

• Waddock S. (2004). Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review 109(1):5–42

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wallace S. (2003). Value Maximization and Stakeholder Theory: Compatible or Not? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15(3):120–127

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Windsor D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9(3):225–256

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wood D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4):691–717

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references