[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation strategies that overlook the interests of local people are prone to create conflicts. The ecosystem service approach holds potential for more comprehensively integrating the social dimension into decision-making in protected areas, but its implementation in conservation policies is still in its infancy. This research assesses the extent to which ecosystem services have been implemented in conservation strategies in protected areas. The study was conducted in two outstanding Spanish protected areas, covering a wetland (Doñana Natural and National Parks) and a Mediterranean mountain system (Sierra Nevada Natural and National Parks). Data were collected from deliberative workshops with managers and researchers, face-to-face surveys with users and a review of management plans. We found that, beyond intrinsic values of ecosystems and biodiversity, these areas provide multiple ecosystem services that deserve further attention to ensure their sustained delivery. Our research shows that environmental managers and researchers have different perceptions and priorities regarding ecosystem services management compared with ecosystem service users. Environmental managers and researchers in both protected areas perceived that human-nature relationships and ecosystem services are already widely included in management plans, if often not explicitly. We found that different ecosystem service categories receive uneven attention in management plans. These contained measures to manage provisioning and cultural services whereas measures for managing regulating services were perceived to be largely absent. We conclude by summarizing insights on how the ecosystem service approach may enhance the consideration of social interests in the management of management protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspizua R, Bonet FJ, Zamora R, Sánchez FJ, Cano-Manuel FJ, Henares I (2010) El Observatorio de Cambio Global de Sierra Nevada: hacia la gestión adaptativa de los espacios naturales. Ecosistemas 19:56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Aznar-Sánchez JA, Galdeano-Gómez E, Pérez-Mesa JC (2011) Intensive horticulture in Almeria: a counterpoint to current European rural policy strategies. J Agrar Change 11:241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban NC, Mills M, Tam J, Hicks CC, Klain S, Stoeckl N, Bottrill MC, Levine J, Pressey RL, Satterfield T, Chan KM (2013) A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front Ecol Environ 11:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertzky B, Corrigan C, Kemsey J, Kenney S, Ravilious C, Besançon C, Burgess N (2012) Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK  

  • Bonet-García FJ, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca RA, Pérez-Pérez R, Puerta-Piñeiro C, Zamora R (2015) Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: A new synthetic (socioeconomic) approach. Biol Conserv 187:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet-García FJ, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca RA, Zamora R (2010) Observatorio de Cambio Global en Sierra Nevada. Estructura y Contenidos Básicos. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía-Universidad de Granada, Granada, p 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudron A, Vigier L, Champigneulle A (2012) Developing collaborative research to improve effectiveness in biodiversity conservation practice. J Appl Ecol 49:753–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission European (2011) The EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Consejería de Medio Ambiente (2004) Plan de Desarrollo Sostenible (PDS) del Parque Natural de Sierra Nevada. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Consejería de Medio Ambiente (2010) Plan de Desarrollo Sostenible II (PDS) de Doñana. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook CN, Carter RB, Fuller RA, Hockings M (2012) Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. J Environ Manage 113:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrel PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux RJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. PNAS 105:9483–9488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS (2016) The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Allen CR, Ban NC, Biggs D, Biggs HC et al (2015) Understanding protected area resilience: a multi-scale, social-ecological approach. Ecol Appl 25:299–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Custodio E, Manzano M, Montes C (2009) Las aguas subterráneas en Doñana. Implicaciones ecológicas y sociales. Agencia Andaluza del Agua, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla

  • Decreto 48/2004 (2004) de 10 de febrero, por el que se aprueba el Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión del Parque Nacional de Doñana. BOJA 44:5517–5580

  • Decreto 97/2005 (2005) de 11 de abril, por el que se establece la ordenación del Parque Nacional y Parque Natural de Doñana. BOJA 105:98–105

  • Decreto 238/2011 (2011) de 12 de julio, por el que se establece la ordenación y gestión de Sierra Nevada. BOJA 155:114–314

  • DeFries R, Hansen A, Turner BL, Reid R, Liu J (2007) Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecol Appl 17:1031–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected areas management categories. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Hockings M, MacKinnon K, Sandwith T, Stoltonet S (2011) National parks with benefits: how protecting the planet’s biodiversity also provides ecosystem services. Solut Sustain Desirable Future 2:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Espacio Natural de Doñana (2011) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2010. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

    Google Scholar 

  • Espacio Natural de Doñana (2012) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2011. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

    Google Scholar 

  • Espacio Natural de Doñana (2013) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2012. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

    Google Scholar 

  • Espacio Natural de Doñana (2014) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2013. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

    Google Scholar 

  • Espacio Natural Sierra Nevada (2012) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2011. Sierra Nevada: Parque Nacional, Parque Natural y Reserva de la Biosfera, Junta de Andalucía

  • Espacio Natural Sierra Nevada (2015) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2014. Junta de Andalucía

  • Flint CG, Kunze I, Muhar A, Yoshida Y, Penker M (2013) Exploring empirical typologies of human-nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landsc Urban Plan 120:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Llorente M, Iniesta-Arandia I, Willaarts B, Harrison PA, Berry P, Bayo MM, Castro AJ, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Biophysical and socio-cultural factors underlying spatial tradeoffs of ecosystem services in semiarid watersheds. Ecol Soc 20(3):39. doi:10.5751/ES-07785-200339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Nieto AP, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Quintas-Soriano C, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders’ profiles. Ecosyst Serv 13:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2011a) Ecosystem services associated with a mosaic of alternative states in a Mediterranean wetland: case study of the Doñana Marsh (southwest Spain). Hydrolog Sci J 56:1374–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Kelemen E, Martín-López B, Palomo I, Montes C (2013) Scale misfit in ecosystem service governance as a source of environmental conflict. Soc Natur Resour 26:1202–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas P, Zorrilla P, Montes C (2011b) Evolution of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean cultural landscape: Doñana case study, Spain (1956–2006). In: Sofo A (ed) Biodiversity. InTech, Rijeka, pp 27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Mingorría S, Reyes-García V, Calvet L, Montes C (2010) Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in Doñana natural areas. Conserv Biol 24:721–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Ortiz A, Oliva M, Salvà-Catarineu M, Salvador-Franch F (2013) The environmental protection of landscapes in the high semiarid Mediterranean mountain of Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain): historical evolution and future perspectives. Appl Geogr 42:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Berry PM, Simpson G, Haslett JR, Blicharska M, Bucur M, Dunford R, Egoh B, García-Llorente M, Geamana N et al (2014) Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 9:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck J, Potschin M, Saarela SR (2015) Ecosystem services and transdisciplinarity (draft). In: Potschin, M, Jax K (eds) OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. http://www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book

  • Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppa LN, Loarie SR, Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of “protected areas”. PNAS 105:6673–6678

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Juffe-Bignoli D, Burgess ND, Bingham H, Belle EMS, de Lima MG, Deguignet M, Bertzky B, Milam AN, Martinez-Lopez J et al (2014) Protected planet report 2014. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovács E, Kelemen E, Kalóczkai Á, Margóczi K, Pataki G, Gébert J, Málovics G, Balázs B et al (2015) Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas. Ecosyst Serv 12:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley 42/2007 (2007) de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. BOE 299:51275–51327

  • Ley 45/2007 (2007) de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. BOE 299:51339–51349

  • Lobo JM, Castro I, Moreno JC (2001) Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Biol J Linn Soc 73:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Hoffman L, Varady RG, Flessa KW, Balvanera P (2010) Ecosystem services across borders: a framework for transboundary conservation policy. Front Ecol Environ 8:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345:1558–1560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C (2011) The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecol Econ 70:1481–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv 142:1370–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Palomo I, Escalera J, Martín-López B, Montes C (2014) Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach. Landsc Ecol 29:1407–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Múgica M, De Lucio JV (1996) The role of on-site experience on landscape preferences. A case study at Doñana National Park (Spain). J Environ Manage 47:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olías M, González F, Cerón J, Bolívar J, González-Labajo J, García-López S (2008) Water quality and distribution of trace elements in the Doñana aquifer (SW Spain). Environ Geol 55:1555–1568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, González JA, Plieninger T, López CA, Montes C (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Reg Environ Change 14:1269–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo I, Martín-López B, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2014a) Limitations of protected areas zoning in Mediterranean cultural landscapes under the ecosystem services approach. Ecosystems 17:1202–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding landscape: mapping ecosystem services flows. Ecosyst Serv 4:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, García Del Amo D, Montes C (2014b) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Change 14:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B, González JA, García-Llorente M, Alcorlo P, García C (2014c) Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. Bioscience 64:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintas-Soriano C, Castro AJ, García-Llorente M, Cabello J, Castro H (2014) From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service. Lands Ecol 132:102–110

  • Quintas-Soriano C, Castro AJ, Castro H, García-Llorente M (2016) Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy 54:534–548

  • Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hawbaker TJ, Gimmi U, Pidgeon AM, Flather CH, Hammer RB, Helmers DP (2010) Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. PNAS 107:940–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clemnts A (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997):1298–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Red de Parques Nacionales (2008) Primer informe de situación de la Red de Parques Nacionales a 1 de Enero de 2007. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, España

    Google Scholar 

  • Red de Parques Nacionales (2012) Segundo informe de situación de la Red de Parques Nacionales (2007–2010). Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, España

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey Benayas JM, de la Montaña M (2003) Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol Conserv 114:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper CJ, Kyle GT (2014) Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. J Environ Manag 145:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano L, Reina M, Martín G, Reyes I, Arechederra A, León D, Toja J (2006) The aquatic systems of Doñana (SW Spain): watersheds and frontiers. Limnetica 25:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S, Dudley N (2010) The contribution of protected areas to human health. WWF and Equilibrium Research

  • Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn NA, Parrotta JA, Nasi R (2011) Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. Bioscience 61:972–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa G, Correa D, Sánchez-Raya AJ, Delgado A, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Bedmar EJ (2011) Effects of nitrate contamination and seasonal variation on the denitrication and greenhouse gas production in La Rocina stream (Doñana National Park, SW Spain). Ecol Eng 37:539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco D, García-Llorente M, Alonso B, Dolera A, Palomo I, Iniesta-Arandia I, Martín-López B (2015) Biodiversity conservation research challenges in the 21st century: a review of publishing trends in 2000 and 2011. Environ Sci Policy 54:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter O, Fuller RA, Segan DB, Carwardine J, Brooks T, Butchart SHM, Di Marco M, Iwamura T et al (2014) Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol 12:e1001891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voth A (2007) National parks and rural development in Spain. In: Mose I (ed) Protected areas and regional development in Europe-Towards a new model for the 21st century. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C, Saarne T, Peterson GD, Colding J (2013) Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept—an historical exploration. Ecol Soc 18:37. doi:10.5751/ES-05368-180137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman DS, Simmons P, Watt AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol Conserv 158:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora R (2010) Las Áreas protegidas como Observatorios del Cambio Global. Ecosistemas 19:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora R, Pérez-Luque AJ, Bonet FJ, Barea-Azcón JM, Aspizua R (eds) (2015) La huella del cambio global en Sierra Nevada: Retos para la conservación. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Junta de Andalucía, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas PL, Montes C (2014) Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 122:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Sierra Nevada National and Natural Park staff and the Department of Environment of the Andalusian Government staff and researchers for attending the workshops conducted, we also thank respondents who kindly answered the survey. Funding for the development of this research was provided by a postdoctoral grant from the Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA) which is co-funded by the European Social Fund, a Juan de la Cierva Grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Project 018/2009), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project CGL2011-30266), the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (FP7, 2007–2013) under the BESAFE project (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Arguments for our Future Environment; http://www.besafe-project.net; Contract No. 282743) and the OpenNESS Project (Operationalisation of Natural capital and Ecosystem Services: From concepts to real-world applications; Contract No. 308428).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Research and Agricultural Extension, Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development (IMIDRA), Finca Experimental “El Encín” Ctra. N-II, Km 38,200, 28800, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Marina García-Llorente

  2. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Edificio de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain

    Marina García-Llorente, Irene Iniesta-Arandia, Carlos Montes & David García del Amo

  3. Environmental Change Institute, Centre for the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK

    Marina García-Llorente, Paula A. Harrison & Pam Berry

  4. Centre for Ecology & Hidrology (CEH), Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK

    Paula A. Harrison

  5. Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Alameda Urquijo 4-4, 48008, Bilbao, Spain

    Ignacio Palomo

  6. Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway

    Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  7. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway

    Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  8. Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany

    Berta Martín-López

Authors
  1. Marina García-Llorente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paula A. Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pam Berry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ignacio Palomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erik Gómez-Baggethun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Irene Iniesta-Arandia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlos Montes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David García del Amo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Berta Martín-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina García-Llorente.

Additional information

Communicated by Rob Bugter, Paula Harrison, John Haslett and Rob Tinch.

This is part of the special issue on ‘BESAFE’.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Llorente, M., Harrison, P.A., Berry, P. et al. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodivers Conserv 27, 1575–1597 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation