Human–robot planning and learning for marine data collection

• Abbeel, P., Coates, A., & Ng, A. Y. (2010). Autonomous helicopter aerobatics through apprenticeship learning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29(13), 1608–1639.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1–8.

• Alvarez, M., & Lawrence, N. (2011). Computationally efficient convolved multiple output gaussian processes. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 1459–1500.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Applegate, D. L., Bixby, R. E., Chvatal, V., & Cook, W. J. (2006). The traveling salesman problem: A computational study. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1109/ICICTA.2009.96.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bryson, M., Reid, A., Ramos, F., & Sukkarieh, S. (2010). Airborne vision-based mapping and classification of large farmland environments. Journal of Field Robotics, 27(5), 632–655.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cao, N., Low, K. H., & Dolan, J. M. (2013). Multi-robot informative path planning for active sensing of environmental phenomena: A tale of two algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 7–14.

• Das, J., Maughan, T., McCann, M., Godin, M., O’Reilly, T., Messie, M., Bahr, F., Gomes, K., Py, F., Bellingham, J. G., Sukhatme, G. S., & Rajan, K. (2011). Towards mixed-initiative, multi-robot field experiments: Design, deployment, and lessons learned. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3132–3139.

• Das, J., Rajany, K., Frolovy, S., Pyy, F., Ryany, J., Caron, D. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2010). Towards marine bloom trajectory prediction for AUV mission planning. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4784–4790.

• Ellison, R., & Cook, M. (2009). Cost-effective automated water quality monitoring systems providing high-resolution data in near real-time. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, pp. 1–10.

• Goetschalckx, R., Fern, A., & Tadepalli, P. (2014). Coactive learning for locally optimal problem solving. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1824–1830.

• Hoang, T. N., Low, K. H., Jaillet, P., & Kankanhalli, M. (2014). Nonmyopic epsilon-Bayes-optimal active learning of Gaussian processes.

• Hollinger, G. A., Englot, B., Hover, F. S., Mitra, U., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2012). Active planning for underwater inspection and the benefit of adaptivity. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(1), 3–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hollinger, G. A., Pereira, A. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2013). Learning uncertainty models for reliable operation of autonomous underwater vehicles. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5593–5599.

• Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2014). Sampling-based robotic information gathering algorithms. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 33(9), 1271–1287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2014). Trajectory learning for human-robot scientific data collection. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 6600–6605.

• Jain, A., Wojcik, B., Joachims, T., & Saxena, A. (2013). Learning trajectory preferences for manipulators via iterative improvement. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 575–583.

• Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E. (2011). Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 30, 846–894.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kim, Y. H., Shell, D. A., Ho, C., & Saripalli, S. (2013). Spatial Interpolation for robotic sampling: Uncertainty with two models of variance. International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, 88, 759–774.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krause, A., & Guestrin, C. (2011). Submodularity and its applications in optimized information gathering. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(4), 32:1–32:20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Latombe, J. C. (1991). Robot motion planning. Boston, ma: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• LaValle, S. M. (2006). Planning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lermusiaux, P. F. (2006). Uncertainty estimation and prediction for interdisciplinary ocean dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 217(1), 176–199.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Li, P., Chao, Y., Vu, Q., Li, Z., Farrara, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, X. (2006). OurOcean—an integrated solution to Ocean monitoring and forecasting. In: OCEANS, pp. 1–6.

• Low, K. H., Dolan, J. M., & Khosla, P. K. (2009). Information-theoretic approach to efficient adaptive path planning for mobile robotic environmental sensing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pp. 233–240.

• Mora, A., Ho, C., & Saripalli, S. (2013). Analysis of adaptive sampling techniques for underwater vehicles. Autonomous Robots, 35(2), 111–122.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nooner, S. L., & Chadwick, W. W. (2009). Volcanic inflation measured in the caldera of axial seamount: Implications for magma supply and future eruptions. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10(2), 1–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pereira, A. A., Binney, J., Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2013). Risk-aware path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles using predictive ocean models. Journal of Field Robotics, 30(5), 741–762.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raman, K., Joachims, T., Shivaswamy, P., & Schnabel, T. (2013). Stable coactive learning via perturbation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 28, 837–845.

  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ratliff, N. D. (2009). Learning to search: Structured prediction techniques for imitation learning. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.

• Reif, J. H. (1979). Complexity of the mover’s problem and generalizations. In Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 421–427.

• Sattar, J., & Dudek, G. (2011). Towards quantitative modeling of task confirmations in human-robot dialog. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1957–1963.

• Shchepetkin, A. F., & McWilliams, J. C. (2005). The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling, 9(4), 347–404.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shivaswamy, P., & Joachims, T. (2012). Online structured prediction via coactive learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning pp. 1–8.

• Silver, D., Bagnell, J. A., & Stentz, A. (2010). Learning from demonstration for autonomous navigation in complex unstructured terrain. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29(12), 1565–1592.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Singh, A., Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Kaiser, W. J., & Batalin, M. A. (2007). Efficient planning of informative paths for multiple robots. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 7, 2204–2211.

  Google Scholar 

• Singh, A., Krause, A., & Kaiser, W. J. (2009). Nonmyopic adaptive informative path planning for multiple robots. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence pp. 1843–1850.

• Smith, R., Das, J., Heidarsson, H., Pereira, A., Arrichiello, F., Cetnic, I., et al. (2010). USC CINAPS builds bridges: Observing and monitoring the Southern California bight. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 17(1), 20–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Somers, T., & Hollinger, G. A. (2014). Coactive learning with a human expert for robotic monitoring. Workshop on Robotic Monitoring at Robotics Science and Systems, 2014, 1–2.

  Google Scholar 

• Somers, T., & Hollinger, G. A. (2015). Coactive learning with a human expert for robotic information gathering. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 559–564.

• Thompson, D. R., Chien, S., Yi Chao, Li, P., Cahill, B., Levin, J., Schofield, O., Balasuriya, A., Petillo, S., Arrott, M., & Meisinger, M. (2010). Spatiotemporal path planning in strong, dynamic, uncertain currents. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4778–4783.

• Willmott, C. J., Ackleson, S. G., Davis, R. E., Feddema, J. J., Klink, K. M., Legates, D. R., et al. (1985). Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(C5), 8995–9005.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yamamoto, J. K. (2000). An alternative measure of the reliability of ordinary Kriging estimates. Mathematical Geology, 32(4), 489–509.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Yamamoto, J. K., & Monteiro, M. (2008). Properties and applications of the interpolation variance associated with ordinary kriging estimates. In: International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, pp. 70–77.

Download references