[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

CCD-BSM:composite-curve-dilation brush stroke model for robotic chinese calligraphy

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brush stroke models play an important role in robotic Chinese calligraphy as the basis of calligraphy stroke generation and are helpful for training models to write robotic Chinese calligraphy. In this study, in contrast to most current stroke models that only consider graphic generation features, we propose a novel stroke model based on composite curve and morphological dilation according to the physical characteristics and writing posture of the brush. In the proposed composite-curve-dilation brush stroke model (CCD-BSM), an oblique section of a cone and two tangent parabolas form a basic graphic, which is dilated with a fixed coefficient according to the extrusion diffusion characteristics of brush hairs. The CCD-BSM can simulate the graphics formed by various specifications of the brush touching the paper with various postures. Moreover, the parameters in CCD-BSM are measurable and controllable without any parameter estimation method or a large number of training samples. Compared with real stroke graphics written by robots, the results of several experiments prove that the proposed CCD-BSM can simulate brushstroke graphics well and show that it outperformed state-of-the-art stroke models. Compared with existing methods, the results demonstrate the advantages of our proposed model in terms of high similarity and especially show the robustness and efficacy of the method with measurable and controllable parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Guo D, Min H (2022) Survey of calligraphy robot. Cont Decision 37(7):1665–1674. https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0132

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang L, Hou Z-X, Zhao Y-H, Zhang DJ (2019) Research progress on and prospects for virtual brush modeling in digital calligraphy and painting. Frontiers Inform Technol Electr Eng 20(10):1307–1321. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1900195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhou C (2014) Simulating the writing process from chinese calligraphy image. J Comput Aided Design Comput Graph 26(6):963–972. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-9775.2014.06.014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin H-I, Chen X, Lin T-T (2020) Calligraphy brush trajectory control of by a robotic arm. Appl Sci 10(23):8694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aksan E, Pece F, Hilliges O (2018) Deepwriting: making digital ink editable via deep generative modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173779

  6. Adamik M, Goga J, Pavlovicova J, Babinec A, Sekaj I (2022) Fast robotic pencil drawing based on image evolution by means of genetic algorithm. Robot Auton Syst 148:103912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang L, Hou Z (2020) A novel virtual 3d brush model based on variable stiffness and haptic feedback. Math Probl Eng, vol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6942947

  8. Otsuki M, Sugihara K, Toda A, Shibata F, Kimura A (2018) A brush device with visual and haptic feedback for virtual painting of 3d virtual objects. Virtual Reality 22(2):167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0317-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu R, Zhou C, Chao F, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C (2020) Integration of an actor-critic model and generative adversarial networks for a chinese calligraphy robot. Neurocomputing 388:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu R, Fang W, Chao F, Gao X, Zhou C, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C (2018) Towards deep reinforcement learning based chinese calligraphy robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), pp 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2018.8664813

  11. Chao F, Lv J, Zhou D, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C, Zhou C (2018) Generative adversarial nets in robotic chinese calligraphy. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 1104–1110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460787

  12. Wu R, Zhou C, Chao F, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C (2020) Ganccrobot: generative adversarial nets based chinese calligraphy robot. Inf Sci 516:474–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao X, Zhou C, Chao F, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C (2019) A robotic writing framework–learning human aesthetic preferences via human–machine interactions. IEEE Access 7:144043–144053. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin G, Guo Z, Chao F, Yang L, Chang X, Lin C-M, Zhou C, Vijayakumar V, Shang C (2021) Automatic stroke generation for style-oriented robotic chinese calligraphy. Futur Gener Comput Syst 119:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Min H (2021) Robot calligraphy system based on brush modeling. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 16(4):707–716. https://doi.org/10.11992/tis.202006033

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wong HT, Ip HH (2000) Virtual brush: a model-based synthesis of chinese calligraphy. Comput Graph 24(1):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00141-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Joshi A (2018) Efficient rendering of linear brush strokes. J Comput Graph Tech, vol 7

  18. Wang S, Chen J, Deng X, Hutchinson S, Dellaert F (2020) Robot calligraphy using pseudospectral optimal control in conjunction with a novel dynamic brush model. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 6696–6703. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341787

  19. Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Z, Konno K, Hu S (2019) Intelligent chinese calligraphy beautification from handwritten characters for robotic writing. Vis Comput 35(6):1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01675-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang Z, Heng W, Zhou S (2019) Learning to paint with model-based deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp 8709–8718. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00880

  21. Schaldenbrand P, Oh J (2021) Content masked loss: human-like brush stroke planning in a reinforcement learning painting agent. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 35, pp 505–512

  22. Bidgoli A, De Guevara ML, Hsiung C, Oh J, Kang E (2020) Artistic style in robotic painting; a machine learning approach to learning brushstroke from human artists. In: 2020 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human communication (RO-MAN), pp 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223533

  23. Chao F, Huang Y, Lin C-M, Yang L, Hu H, Zhou C (2018) Use of automatic chinese character decomposition and human gestures for chinese calligraphy robots. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst 49(1):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2882485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chao F, Lin G, Zheng L, Chang X, Lin C-M, Yang L, Shang C (2020) An lstm based generative adversarial architecture for robotic calligraphy learning system. Sustainability 12(21):9092–9102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie Z, Hiroyuki F, Akinori H, Hiroyuki K (2020) Modeling and manipulating dynamic font-based hairy brush characters using control-theoretic b-spline approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2):4731–4736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng J, Chen Q, Liu Y, Wang M, Yao Y (2021) Strokegan: reducing mode collapse in chinese font generation via stroke encoding. In: Proceedings of AAAI, vol 35, pp 3270–3277

  27. Liang D-T, Liang D, Xing S, Li P, Wu X-C (2020) A robot calligraphy writing method based on style transferring algorithm and similarity evaluation. Intel Serv Robotics 13(1):137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-019-00298-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotani A, Tellex S (2019) Teaching robots to draw. In: 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 4797–4803. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793484

  29. Xu P, Wang L, Guan Z, Zheng X, Chen X, Tang Z, Fang D, Gong X, Wang Z (2018) Evaluating brush movements for chinese calligraphy: a computer vision based approach. In: 27th International joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2018, pp 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/146

  30. Gao X, Zhou C, Chao F, Yang L, Lin C-M, Xu T, Shang C, Shen Q (2019) A data-driven robotic chinese calligraphy system using convolutional auto-encoder and differential evolution. Knowl-Based Syst, vol 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.06.010

  31. Li Q, Fei C, Gao X, Yang L, Lin C-M, Shang C, Zhou C (2019) A robotic chinese stroke generation model based on competitive swarm optimizer. In: UK workshop on computational intelligence, pp 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29933-0_8

  32. Gleeson D, Jakobsson S, Salman R, Ekstedt F, Sandgren N, Edelvik F, Carlson JS, Lennartson B (2022) Generating optimized trajectories for robotic spray painting. IEEE Trans Automation Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3156803

  33. Wu R, Chao F, Zhou C, Huang Y, Yang L, Lin C-M, Chang X, Shen Q, Shang C (2021) A developmental evolutionary learning framework for robotic chinese stroke writing. IEEE Trans Cognit Development Syst, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2021.3098229

  34. Senthilpari C, Ramanamurthy G, Ramesh P, Velrajkumar P, Kodandapani D (2019) Development of smart number writing robotic arm using stochastic gradient decent algorithm. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng 8(10):542–547. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.J8851.0881019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gülzow JM, Grayver L, Deussen O (2018) Self-improving robotic brushstroke replication. In: Arts, vol 7, p 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7040084

  36. Fu Y, Yu H, Yeh C-K, Lee T-Y, Zhang JJ (2021) Fast accurate and automatic brushstroke extraction. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl (TOMM) 17(2):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3429742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xiao Y, Lei W, Lu L, Chang X, Zheng X, Chen X (2021) Cs-gan: cross-structure generative adversarial networks for chinese calligraphy translation. Knowl-Based Syst 229:107334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ko DH, ul Hassan A, Suk J, Choi J (2021) SKFOnt: skeleton-driven korean font generator with conditional deep adversarial networks. Int J Document Anal Recognit (IJDAR):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-021-00374-4

  40. Ko DH, ul Hassan A, Majeed S, Choi J (2021) SkelGAN: a font image skeletonization method. J Inform Process Syst 17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.02.0152

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jian M, Dong J, Gong M, Yu H, Nie L, Yin Y, Lam K-M (2019) Learning the traditional art of chinese calligraphy via three-dimensional reconstruction and assessment. IEEE Trans Multimed 22(4):970–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2019.2937187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li C, Yang C, Giannetti C (2019) Segmentation and generalisation for writing skills transfer from humans to robots. Cognit Computat Syst 1(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs.2018.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62073249) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M672426).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Science and Technology, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 947 Heping Avenue, Wuhan, 430081, Qingshan District, China

    Dongmei Guo, Liang Ye, Guang Yan & Huasong Min

  2. College of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University of Science and Technology, 168 Taifung Street, Huainan, 232001, Tian Jiaan District, China

    Dongmei Guo

Authors
  1. Dongmei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huasong Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liang Ye or Huasong Min.

Ethics declarations

Statements and Declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The data is available and deposited upon request at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6470051

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest. The research in this manuscript doesn’t involve Human Participants and/or Animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, D., Ye, L., Yan, G. et al. CCD-BSM:composite-curve-dilation brush stroke model for robotic chinese calligraphy. Appl Intell 53, 14269–14283 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04210-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04210-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation