[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using generalized normal distribution optimization

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The newly proposed Generalized Normal Distribution Optimization (GNDO) algorithm is used to design the truss structures with optimal weight. All trusses optimized have frequency constraints, which make them very challenging optimization problems. A large number of locally optimal solutions and non-convexity of search space make them difficult to solve, therefore, they are suitable for testing the performance of optimization algorithm. This work investigates whether the proposed algorithm is capable of coping with such problems. To evaluate the GNDO algorithm, three benchmark truss optimization problems are considered with frequency constraints. Numerical data show GNDO’s reliability, stability, and efficiency for structural optimization problems than other meta-heuristic algorithms. We thoroughly analyse and investigate the performance of GNDO in this engineering area for the first time in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Erbatur F, Hasançebi O, Tütüncü I, Kılıç H (2000) Optimal design of planar and space structures with genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 75(2):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh A, Kalatjari V (2004) Size/geometry optimization of trusses by the force method and genetic algorithm. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech für Angew Math und Mech Appl Math Mech 84(5):347–357

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Li LJ, Huang ZB, Liu F (2009) A heuristic particle swarm optimization method for truss structures with discrete variables. Comput Struct 87(7–8):435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaveh A, Talatahari S, Khodadadi N (2020) Stochastic paint optimizer: theory and application in civil engineering. Eng Comput:1–32

  5. Kaveh A, Khodadadi N, Azar BF, and Talatahari S, (2020) “Optimal design of large-scale frames with an advanced charged system search algorithm using box-shaped sections,” Eng Comput 1–21

  6. Pierezan J, dos Santos Coelho L, Mariani VC, de Vasconcelos Segundo EH, Prayogo D (2021) Chaotic coyote algorithm applied to truss optimization problems. Comput Struct 242:106353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaveh A, Eslamlou AD, Khodadadi N (2020) Dynamic water strider algorithm for optimal Design of Skeletal Structures. Period Polytech Civ Eng 64(3):904–916

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bellagamba L, Yang TY (1981) Minimum-mass truss structures with constraints on fundamental natural frequency. AIAA J 19(11):1452–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Camp CV (2007) Design of space trusses using big bang–big crunch optimization. J Struct Eng 133(7):999–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azad SK, Aminbakhsh S (2021) High-dimensional optimization of large-scale steel truss structures using guided stochastic search. Structures 33:1439–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaveh A, Talatahari S, Khodadadi N (2019) The hybrid invasive weed optimization-shuffled frog-leaping algorithm applied to optimal Design of Frame Structures. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(3):882–897

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huynh TN, Do DTT, Lee J (2021) Q-learning-based parameter control in differential evolution for structural optimization. Appl Soft Comput 107:107464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaveh A, Khodadadi N, Talatahari S (2021) A comparative study for the optimal design of steel structures using Css and Acss algorithms. Iran Univ Sci Technol 11(1):31–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasançebi O (2008) Adaptive evolution strategies in structural optimization: enhancing their computational performance with applications to large-scale structures. Comput Struct 86(1–2):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khodadadi N, Azizi M, Talatahari S, and Sareh P, (2021) “Multi-Objective Crystal Structure Algorithm (MOCryStAl): Introduction and Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Access

  16. Wang D, Zhang WH, Jiang JS (2004) Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints. AIAA J 42(3):622–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sedaghati R, Suleman A, Tabarrok B (2002) Structural optimization with frequency constraints using the finite element force method. AIAA J 40(2):382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomes HM (2011) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miguel LFF, Miguel LFF (2012) Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9458–9467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farshchin M, Camp CV, Maniat M (2016) Optimal design of truss structures for size and shape with frequency constraints using a collaborative optimization strategy. Expert Syst Appl 66:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2012) Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using a hybridized CSS-BBBC algorithm with trap recognition capability. Comput Struct 102:14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI (2017) Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Acta Mech 228(1):307–322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Millan-Paramo C and Abdalla Filho JE, (2019)“Size and shape optimization of truss structures with natural frequency constraints using modified simulated annealing algorithm,” Arab J Sci Eng pp. 1–15

  24. Zuo W, Bai J, Li B (2014) A hybrid OC–GA approach for fast and global truss optimization with frequency constraints. Appl Soft Comput 14:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaveh A, Javadi SM (2014) Shape and size optimization of trusses with multiple frequency constraints using harmony search and ray optimizer for enhancing the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Acta Mech 225(6):1595–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Modified sub-population teaching-learning-based optimization for design of truss structures with natural frequency constraints. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 44(4):495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farshchin M, Camp CV, Maniat M (2016) Multi-class teaching–learning-based optimization for truss design with frequency constraints. Eng Struct 106:355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaveh A, Talatahari S, and Khodadadi N, (2019) “Hybrid invasive weed optimization-shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for optimal design of truss structures,” Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 1–16

  29. Li L-J, Huang ZB, Liu F, Wu QH (2007) A heuristic particle swarm optimizer for optimization of pin connected structures. Comput Struct 85(7–8):340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Coello CAC (2002) Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(11–12):1245–1287

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Y, Jin Z, Mirjalili S (2020) Generalized normal distribution optimization and its applications in parameter extraction of photovoltaic models. Energy Convers Manag 224:113301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Konzelman CJ, (1986) Dual methods and approximation concepts for structural optimization

  33. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2017) Truss shape and size optimization with frequency constraints using tug of war optimization. Asian J Civ Eng 7(2):311–333

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2015) An improved CSS for damage detection of truss structures using changes in natural frequencies and mode shapes. Adv Eng Softw 80:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Adaptive symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm for structural design optimization. J Comput Des Eng 3(3):226–249

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2015) Colliding-bodies optimization for truss optimization with multiple frequency constraints. J Comput Civ Eng 29(5):4014078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2014) Democratic PSO for truss layout and size optimization with frequency constraints. Comput Struct 130:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2013) Optimal design of structures with multiple natural frequency constraints using a hybridized BB-BC/quasi-Newton algorithm. Period Polytech Civ Eng 57(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2016) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using UECBO. Adv Comput Des 1(2):119–138

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI (2015) Enhanced colliding bodies algorithm for truss optimization with frequency constraints. J Comput Civ Eng 29(6):4014104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI (2015) Hybridized optimization algorithms for design of trusses with multiple natural frequency constraints. Adv Eng Softw 79:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyedali Mirjalili.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S. Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using generalized normal distribution optimization. Appl Intell 52, 10384–10397 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03051-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03051-5

Keywords

Navigation