[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

On the interaction between knowledge and social commitments in multi-agent systems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both knowledge and social commitments have received considerable attention in Multi-Agent Systems (MASs), specially for multi-agent communication. Plenty of work has been carried out to define their semantics. However, the relationship between social commitments and knowledge has not been investigated yet. In this paper, we aim to explore such a relationship from the semantics and model checking perspectives with respect to CTLK logic (an extension of CTL logic with modality for reasoning about knowledge) and CTLC logic (an extension of CTL with modalities for reasoning about commitments and their fulfillments). To analyze this logical relationship, we simply combine the two logics in one new logic named CTLKC. The purpose of such a combination is not to advocate a new logic, but only to express and figure out some reasoning postulates merging both knowledge and commitments as they are currently defined in the literature. By so doing, we identify some paradoxes in the new logic showing that simply combining current versions of commitment and knowledge logics results in a logical language that violates some fundamental intuitions. Consequently, we propose CTLKC+, a new logic that fixes the identified paradoxes and allows us to reason about social commitments and knowledge simultaneously in a consistent manner. Furthermore, we address the problem of model checking CTLKC+ by reducing it to the problem of model checking GCTL∗, a generalized version of CTL∗ with action formulae. By doing so, we directly benefit from CWB-NC, the model checker of GCTL∗. Using this reduction, we also prove that the computational complexity of model checking CTLKC+ is still PSPACE-complete for concurrent programs as the complexity of model checking CTLK and CTLC separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/cwb/.

References

  1. Alberti M, Gavanelli M, Lamma E, Mello P, Torroni P (2004) Specification and verification of agent interaction using social integrity constraints. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 85(2):94–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldewereld H (2007) Autonomy vs conformity: an institutional perspective on norms and protocols. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  3. Aldewereld H, Álvarez Napagao S, Dignum F, Vázquez-Salceda J (2009) Engineering social reality with inheritance relations. In: Aldewereld H, Dignum V, Picard G (eds) ESAW. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5881. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aldewereld H, Álvarez Napagao S, Dignum F, Vázquez-Salceda J (2010) Making norms concrete. In: van der Hoek W, Kaminka GA, Lespérance Y, Luck M, Sen S (eds) 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2010), Toronto, Canada, 10–14 May 2010, vols 1–3, pp 807–814. IFAAMAS

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anger FD, Clarke EM (1993) New and used temporal models: an issue of time. Appl Intell 3(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baier C, Katoen J-P (2008) Principles of model checking. Representation and mind series. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baldoni M, Baroglio C, Marengo E (2010) Behavior-oriented commitment-based protocols. In: ECAI, pp 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett B, Cohn AG, Wolter F, Zakharyaschev M (2002) Multi-dimensional modal logic as a framework for spatio-temporal reasoning. Appl Intell 17(3):239–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bentahar J, El-Menshawy M, Qu H, Dssouli R (2012) Communicative commitments: model checking and complexity analysis. Knowl-Based Syst 35:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bentahar J, Meyer J-J, Wan W (2010) Model checking agent communication. In: Specification and verification of multi-agent systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhat G, Cleaveland R, Groce A (2001) Efficient model checking via Büchi tableau automata. In: Berry G, Comon H, Finkel A (eds) CAV 2001. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 38–52

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blackburn P, de Rijke M, Venema Y (2001) Modal logic. Cambridge University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Both F, Hoogendoorn M, van der Mee A, Treur J, de Vos M (2012) An intelligent agent model with awareness of workflow progress. Appl Intell 36(2):498–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke E, Grumberg O, Peled D (1999) Model checking. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cox B, Tygar JD, Sirbu M (1995) Netbill security and transaction protocol. In: First USENIX workshop on electronic commerce, pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Desai N, Cheng Z, Chopra AK, Singh MP (2007) Toward verification of commitment protocols and their compositions. In: AAMAS, pp 144–146

    Google Scholar 

  17. Desai N, Chopra AK, Singh MP (2009) Amoeba: a methodology for modeling and evolving cross-organizational business processes. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 19(2):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dignum F, Greaves M (eds) (2000) Issues in agent communication. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1916. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dignum F, Meyer J-JC, Wieringa R, Kuiper R (1996) A modal approach to intentions, commitments and obligations: intention plus commitment yields obligation. In: DEON, pp 80–97

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dourlens S, Ramdane-Cherif A, Monacelli E (2013) Multi levels semantic architecture for multimodal interaction. Appl Intell 38(4):586–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Menshawy M (2012) Model checking logics of social commitments for agent communication. PhD thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

  22. El-Menshawy M, Bentahar J, Dssouli R (2010) Verifiable semantic model for agent interactions using social commitments. In: LADS, pp 128–152

    Google Scholar 

  23. El-Menshawy M, Bentahar J, El-Kholy W, Dssouli R (2013) Reducing model checking commitments for agent communication to model checking arctl and gctl*. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 27(3):375–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Menshawy M, Bentahar J, El-Kholy W, Dssouli R (2013) Verifying conformance of multi-agent commitment-based protocol. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):122–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Menshawy M, Bentahar J, Qu H, Dssouli R (2011) On the verification of social commitments and time. In: AAMAS, pp 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fagin R, Halpern JY, Moses Y, Vardi MY (1995) Reasoning about knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Fornara N, Colombetti M (2004) A commitment-based approach to agent communication. Appl Artif Intell 18(9–10):853–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fornara N, Viganò F, Verdicchio M, Colombetti M (2008) Artificial institutions: a model of institutional reality for open multiagent systems. Artif Intell Law 16(1):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gabbay DM (2003) Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics series. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grossi D, Aldewereld H, Vázquez-Salceda J, Dignum F (2006) Ontological aspects of the implementation of norms in agent-based electronic institutions. Comput Math Organ Theory 12(2–3):251–275

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Günay A, Yolum P (2013) Constraint satisfaction as a tool for modeling and checking feasibility of multiagent commitments. Appl Intell 39(3):489–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Halpern JY (1995) Reasoning about knowledge: a survey. Technical report, IBM Almaden Research Center

  33. Halpern JY, Moses Y (1990) Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. J ACM 37(3):549–587

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Halpern JY, Rêgo LC (2013) Reasoning about knowledge of unawareness revisited. Math Soc Sci 65(2):73–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Halpern JY, Shore RA (2004) Reasoning about common knowledge with infinitely many agents. Inf Comput 191(1):1–40

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Hintikka J (1962) Knowledge and belief: an introduction to the logic of the two notions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kupferman O, Vardi M, Wolper P (2000) An automata-theoretic approach to branching-time model checking. J ACM 47(2):312–360

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Lenzen W (1978) Recent work in epistemic logic. Acta philosophica fennica, vol 30. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lomuscio A, Penczek W (2012) Symbolic model checking for temporal-epistemic logic. In: Logic programs, norms and action, pp 172–195

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Lomuscio A, Raimondi F (2006) The complexity of model checking concurrent programs against ctlk specifications. In: Declarative agent languages and technologies IV. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4327. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Mallya AU, Singh MP (2007) An algebra for commitment protocols. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 14(2):143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mousavi A, Nordin MJ, Othman ZA (2012) Ontology-driven coordination model for multiagent-based mobile workforce brokering systems. Appl Intell 36(4):768–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Obeid N (2005) A formalism for representing and reasoning with temporal information, event and change. Appl Intell 23(2):109–119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Parikh R, Ramanujam R (1985) Distributed processes and the logic of knowledge. In: Logic of programs, pp 256–268

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Penczek W, Lomuscio A (2003) Verifying epistemic properties of multi-agent systems via bounded model checking. In: AAMAS, pp 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  46. Raimondi F (2006) Model checking multi-agent systems. PhD thesis, University College, London, London

  47. Rosenschein SJ (1985) Formal theories of knowledge in AI and robotics. New Gener Comput 3(4):345–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Serrano E, Such JM, Botía J, García-Fornes A (2013) Strategies for avoiding preference profiling in agent-based e-commerce environments. Appl Intell. doi:10.1007/s10489-013-0448-2

    Google Scholar 

  50. Singh MP (1998) Agent communication languages: rethinking the principles. Computer 31(12):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Singh MP (1999) An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems. Artif Intell Law 7(1):97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Singh MP (2000) A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Issues in agent communication, pp 31–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Sirbu MA (1997) Credits and debits on the Internet. IEEE Spectr 34(2):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Su C, Li H (2012) An affective learning agent with petri-net-based implementation. Appl Intell 37(4):569–585

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. van der Meyden R, shu Wong K (2003) Complete axiomatizations for reasoning about knowledge and branching time. Stud Log 75(1):93–123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Venkatraman M, Singh MP (1999) Verifying compliance with commitment protocols. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 2(3):217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wan W, Bentahar J, Hamza AB (2012) Quantitative model checking of knowledge. In: SoMeT, pp 91–107

    Google Scholar 

  58. Winikoff M (2007) Implementing commitment-based interactions. In: AAMAS, pp 873–880

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wooldridge M (2000) Computationally grounded theories of agency. In: ICMAS, pp 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wooldridge M (2002) Introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wooldridge M, Lomuscio A (2000) Multi-agent VSK logic. In: JELIA, pp 300–312

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yolum P, Singh MP (2004) Reasoning about commitments in the event calculus: an approach for specifying and executing protocols. Ann Math Artif Intell 42(1–3):227–253

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable technical comments and suggestions. The first, second, third, and fourth authors would like to thank, respectively, Al al-Bayt University (Jordan), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Ministry of Higher Education (Libya), and Menofia University (Egypt) for their financial supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

    Faisal Al-Saqqar, Jamal Bentahar, Khalid Sultan & Mohamed El Menshawy

  2. Faculty of Computers and Information, Menofia University, Menofia, Egypt

    Mohamed El Menshawy

Authors
  1. Faisal Al-Saqqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamal Bentahar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khalid Sultan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamed El Menshawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamal Bentahar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Saqqar, F., Bentahar, J., Sultan, K. et al. On the interaction between knowledge and social commitments in multi-agent systems. Appl Intell 41, 235–259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-013-0513-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-013-0513-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation