On the methods of pricing American options: case study

• Andersen, L., & Broadie, M. (2004). Primal-dual simulation algorithm for pricing multidimensional American options. Management Science, 50, 1222–1234.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Averbukh, V.: Pricing American options using Monte Carlo simulation. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University (1997)

• Barone-Adesi, G., & Whaley, R. E. (1987). Efficient analytic approximation of American options values. The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 301–320.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barraquand, J., & Martineau, D. (1995). Numerical valuation of high dimensional multivariate American securities. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 383–405.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bjerksund, P., Stensland, G. (1992). American exchange options and a put-call transformation. Working paper no. 4/92, Institute of Finance and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.

• Bjerksund, P., & Stensland, G. (1993). Closed-form approximation of American options. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 9, 87–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bjerksund, P., Stensland, G. (2002). Closed-form valuation of American options. Working Paper NHH.

• Black, F. (1975). Fact and fantasy in the use of options. Financial Analysts Journal, 31(4), 36–72.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bossaerts, P. (1989). Simulation estimators of optimal early exercise. Working paper, Carnegie-Mellon University.

• Boyle, P. P. (1988). A lattice framework for option pricing with two state variables. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 1–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brennan, M., & Schwartz, E. (1978). Finite difference methods and jump processes arising in the pricing of contingent claims: A synthesis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13(3), 461–474.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carr, P. (1998). Randomization and the American put. Review of Financial Studies, 11, 597–626.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carriere, J. (1996). Valuation of early-exercise price of options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 19, 19–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Courtadon, G. (1982). A more accurate finite difference approximation for the valuation of options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 17, 697–705.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., & Rubinstein, M. (1979). On the valuation of American call options on stocks with known dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229–264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crank, J., & Nicolson, P. (1947). A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat conduction type. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 43(1), 50–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cryer, C. W. (1971). The solution of a quadratic programming problem using systematic overrelaxation. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 9(3), 385–392.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garcia, D. (1999). A Monte Carlo method for pricing American options. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.

• Geske, R. (1979). The valuation of compound options. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 63–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geske, R. (1981). Comments on Whaley’s note. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2), 213–215.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gilli, M., Schumann, E. (2009). Implementing binomial trees. Comisef Working Paper Series.

• Haug, E. G., Haug, J., & Lewis, A. (2003). Back to basics: A new approach to the discrete dividend problem. London: Wilmott Magazine.

  Google Scholar 

• Haugh, M., & Kogan, L. (2004). Pricing American options: A duality approach. Operations Research, 52, 258–270.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ibanez, A., Zapatero, F. (1998). Monte Carlo valuation of American options through computation of the optimal exercise frontier. Working paper, University of Southern California.

• Kozpinar, S. (2013). Pricing American options under discrete and continuous time setting. M.Sc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University.

• Kwok, Y. K. (2008). Mathematical Models of Financial Derivatives. Berlin: Springer Finance.

  Google Scholar 

• Longstaff, F. A., & Schwartz, E. S. (2001). Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. The Society for Financial Studies, 14(1), 113–147.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morton, K. W., & Mayers, D. F. (1995). Numerical solutions of partial differential equations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Protter, P., Clement, E., & Lamberton, D. (2002). An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing. Finance and Stochastics, 6(4), 449–471.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, L. (2002). Monte Carlo valuation of American options. Mathematical Finance, 3, 271–286.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roll, R. (1977). An analytic valuation formula for unprotected American call options on stocks with known dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 251–258.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, E. S. (1977). The valuation of warrants: Implementing a new approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 79–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tilley, J. A. (1993). Valuing American options in a path simulation model. Transactions of the Society of the Actuaries, 45, 83–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsitsiklis, J., & Van Roy, B. (1999). Optimal stopping of Markov processes: Hilbert space theory, approximation algorithms, and an application to pricing high-dimensional financial derivatives. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44, 1840–1851.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Uğur, Ö. (2009). An introduction to computational finance. London: Imperial College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Whaley, R. E. (1981). On the valuation of American call options on stocks with known dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 207–211.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wu, Z. (2012). Pricing American options using Monte Carlo method. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Oxford.

Download references