[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper introduces a Value-at-Risk (VaR) model to generate route choices for a hazmat shipment based on a specified risk confidence level. VaR is a threshold value such that the probability of the loss exceeding the VaR value is less than a given probability level. The objective is to determine a route which minimizes the likelihood that the risk will be greater than a set threshold. Several properties of the VaR model are established. An exact solution procedure is proposed and tested to solve the single-trip problem. To test the applicability of the approach, routes obtained from the VaR model are compared with those obtained from other hazmat objectives, on a numerical example as well as a hazmat routing scenario derived from the Albany district of New York State. Depending on the choice of the confidence level, the VaR model gives different paths from which we conclude that the route choice is a function of the level of risk tolerance of the decision-maker. Further refinements of the VaR model are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Algorithm 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abkowitz, M., & Cheng, P. (1988). Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements of hazardous materials. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 20(1), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abkowitz, M., Eiger, A., & Srinivasan, S. (1984). Estimating the release rates and costs of transporting hazardous waste. Transportation Research Record, 977, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abkowitz, M., Lepofsky, M., & Cheng, P. (1992). Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes. Transportation Research Record, 1333, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh, A., & Nomikos, N. (2009). Shipping derivatives and risk management. Basingstone: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alp, E. (1995). Risk-based transportation planning practice: overall methodology and a case example. INFOR. Information Systems and Operational Research, 33(1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelidis, T., & Skiadopoulos, G. (2008). Measuring the market risk of freight rates: a value-at-risk approach. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(05), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batta, R., & Chiu, S. (1988). Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Operations Research, 36(1), 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beder, T. (1995). VaR: seductive but dangerous. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(5), 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2007). Mixed routing strategies for hazardous materials: decision-making under complete uncertainty. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1(2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dePalma, A., Picard, N., & Andrieu, L. (2012). Risk in transport investments. Networks and Spatial Economics, 12(2), 187–204. doi:10.1007/s11067-009-9109-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droz, R. (2009). US highways: from US 1 to US 830—termini and lengths in miles. http://www.us-highways.com/us1830.htm.

  • Erkut, E., & Ingolfsson, A. (2000). Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transportation Science, 34(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, E., & Verter, V. (1998). Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Operations Research, 42(5), 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration (2007). FHWA route log and finder list—interstate system—design. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/routefinder/index.cfm.

  • Hallerbach, W. G., & Menkveld, A. J. (2004). Analysing perceived downside risk: the component value-at-risk framework. European Financial Management, 10(4), 567–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y. (2004). Deterministic sorting in \(\mathcal{O} (n \log \log n )\) time and linear space. Journal of Algorithms, 50(1), 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968). A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D., Viner, J., & Russell, E. (1993). Procedure for developing truck accident and release rates for hazmat routing. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 119(1), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., & Batta, R. (1997). Objectives derived from viewing hazmat shipments as a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials. Transportation Science, 31(3), 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: the New Benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, Y., Yang, G., Liang, G., & Feng, Y. (2002). VaR and its application in civil aviation transportation. In Proceedings of the 4th world congress on intelligent control and automation (Vol. 1, pp. 677–681), Shanghai, China, June 10–14. IEEE. doi:10.1109/WCICA.2002.1022199.

  • Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2007). Value-at-risk in IT services contracts. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2007.603.

  • Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2008). Value-at-risk in service-oriented systems: a framework for managing a vendors portfolio uncertainties. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D. E. (1998). Art of computer programming, vol. 3: Sorting and searching (2nd ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, N., Mausser, H., & Uryasev, S. (2001). Algorithms for optimization of value-at-risk (Research Report 2001-9). ISE Dept., University of Florida.

  • Linsmeier, T. J., & Pearson, N. D. (1996). Risk measurement: an introduction to value at risk. Finance, EconWPA.

  • Lu, H., Yu, X., Zhao, X., Li, Y., & Cheng, N. (2010). A multi-attribute stochastic programming approach for supply chain planning with var. ASCE, 382, 438. http://link.aip.org/link/?ASC/382/438/1. doi:10.1061/41127(382)438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, 36, 394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo, M. R., & Leuthold, R. M. (1998). Agricultural applications of value-at-risk analysis: a perspective. Finance, 9805002, EconWPA.

  • McIlroy, P. M., Bostic, K., & McIlroy, M. D. (1993). Engineering radix sort. Computing Systems, 6(1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocco, B. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Enterprise risk management: theory and practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(4), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offutt, E. J., Kharoufeh, J. P., & Deckro, R. F. (2006). Distorted risk measures with application to military capability shortfalls. Military Operations Research, 11(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, M., & Horowitz, A. (1994). Optimal routing of hazardous materials considering risk of spill. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 28(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, I. (1971). Bi-directional search. Machine Intelligence, 6, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1960). The maximum capacity through a network. Operations Research, 8(5), 733–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle, C., Cohon, J., & Shobrys, D. (1991). Simultaneous siting and routing in the disposal of hazardous wastes. Transportation Science, 25(2), 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccomanno, F., & Chan, A. (1985). Economic evaluation of routing strategies for hazardous road shipments. Transportation Research Record, 1020, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. R., & Manfredo, M. R. (2002). The role of value-at-risk in purchasing: an application to the foodservice industry. Supply Chain Management, 38(2), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebl, G. B., & Berleant, D. (2002). Bounding the composite value at risk for energy service company operation with DEnv, and interval-based algorithm. In SIAM workshop on validated computing 2002 (extended abstracts) (pp. 23–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, R., Batta, R., & Karwan, M. (1993a). Establishing credible risk criteria for transporting extremely dangerous hazardous materials. In F. Saccomanno & K. Cassidy (Eds.), Transportation of dangerous goods: assessing the risks, Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Canada (pp. 335–342).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, R. A., Rajan, B., & Karwan, M. (1993b). A network-based model for transporting extremely hazardous materials. Operations Research Letters, 13(2), 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, R., Batta, R., & Karwan, M. (1995). A multiple route conditional risk model for transporting hazardous materials. INFOR. Information Systems and Operational Research, 33(1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Chou, J., & Romeijn, E. (1998). Approximating shortest paths in large scale networks with application to intelligent transportation systems. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 10(2), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C., Usher, S. E., LaGattuta, D., & Youngen, J. (2001). A comparables approach to measuring cashflow-at-risk for non-financial firms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(4), 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorup, M. (2002). Randomized sorting in \(\mathcal{O} ( {n \log \log n} )\) time and linear space using addition, shift, and bit-wise boolean operations. Journal of Algorithms, 42(2), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2010). United States Census 2010. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/.

  • US Department of Transportation Pipeline, & Materials Safety Administration, H. (2012). Yearly incident summary reports. http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/library/data-stats/incidents. Accessed August 31, 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1068585. The authors are grateful to Iakovos Toumazis for his help in data management and numerical computation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norfolk Southern Corporation, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Yingying Kang

  2. Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon

Authors
  1. Yingying Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajan Batta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Changhyun Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changhyun Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, Y., Batta, R. & Kwon, C. Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res 222, 361–387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1285-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1285-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation