[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

VW-PINNs: A volume weighting method for PDE residuals in physics-informed neural networks

VW-PINNs: 物理信息神经网络中PDE残差的体积加权方法

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown remarkable prospects in solving the forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations (PDEs). The method embeds PDEs into the neural network by calculating the PDE loss at a set of collocation points, providing advantages such as meshfree and more convenient adaptive sampling. However, when solving PDEs using nonuniform collocation points, PINNs still face challenge regarding inefficient convergence of PDE residuals or even failure. In this work, we first analyze the ill-conditioning of the PDE loss in PINNs under nonuniform collocation points. To address the issue, we define volume weighting residual and propose volume weighting physics-informed neural networks (VW-PINNs). Through weighting the PDE residuals by the volume that the collocation points occupy within the computational domain, we embed explicitly the distribution characteristics of collocation points in the loss evaluation. The fast and sufficient convergence of the PDE residuals for the problems involving nonuniform collocation points is guaranteed. Considering the meshfree characteristics of VW-PINNs, we also develop a volume approximation algorithm based on kernel density estimation to calculate the volume of the collocation points. We validate the universality of VW-PINNs by solving the forward problems involving flow over a circular cylinder and flow over the NACA0012 airfoil under different inflow conditions, where conventional PINNs fail. By solving the Burgers’ equation, we verify that VW-PINNs can enhance the efficiency of existing the adaptive sampling method in solving the forward problem by three times, and can reduce the relative L2 error of conventional PINNs in solving the inverse problem by more than one order of magnitude.

摘要

物理信息神经网络(Physics-informed neural networks, PINNs)已经在偏微分方程(Partial differential equations, PDEs)正反问题求解领域展示出广阔前景. 该方法通过在一组配置点上计算PDE损失实现了偏微分方程在神经网络中的嵌入, 具有无网格、易于自适应采样等优势. 然而, 当使用非均匀配置点求解方程时, PINNs面临方程残差收敛效率低甚至求解失败的问题. 本研究首先分析了非均匀配置点下PINNs中PDE损失函数的病态. 然后针对性地定义了体积加权残差的概念, 并提出了体积加权的物理信息神经网络(Volume weighting physics-informed neural networks, VW-PINNs). 通过使用配置点在求解区域占据的体积对方程残差进行加权, 配置点的空间分布特征被显式地引入PDE损失函数中, 保证了方程残差快速充分的收敛. 同时, 考虑到VW-PINNs的无网格特性, 我们还基于核函数估计发展了近似算法来计算配置点的体积. 我们通过求解PINNs失效的不同来流条件下的圆柱、翼型绕流正问题验证了VW-PINNs的普适性. 通过求解Burgers’方程, 我们验证了VW-PINNs能够将现有自适应采样方法在正问题上的收敛速度提升三倍, 能够将PINNs在反问题上的相对L2误差降低一个数量级以上.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. W. M. G. Dissanayake, and N. Phan-Thien, Neural-network-based approximations for solving partial differential equations, Commun. Numer. Meth. Eng. 10, 195 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. G. Baydin, B. A. Pearlmutter, A. A. Radul, J. M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 5595 (2018).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Sirignano, and K. Spiliopoulos, DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 375, 1339 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next, J. Sci. Comput. 92, 88 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Raissi, A. Yazdani, and G. E. Karniadakis, Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations, Science 367, 1026 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Xu, Z. Sun, R. Huang, D. Guo, G. Yang, and S. Ju, A practical approach to flow field reconstruction with sparse or incomplete data through physics informed neural network, Acta Mech. Sin. 39, 322302 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Hou, B. Zhu, and Y. Wang, Net: discovering the turbulence model and applying for low Reynolds number turbulent channel flow, Acta Mech. Sin. 39, 322326 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Cai, Z. Mao, Z. Wang, M. Yin, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review, Acta Mech. Sin. 37, 1727 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Zobeiry, and K. D. Humfeld, A physics-informed machine learning approach for solving heat transfer equation in advanced manufacturing and engineering applications, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 101, 104232 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Amini Niaki, E. Haghighat, T. Campbell, A. Poursartip, and R. Vaziri, Physics-informed neural network for modelling the thermochemical curing process of composite-tool systems during manufacture, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 384, 113959 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Raissi, Z. Wang, M. S. Triantafyllou, and G. E. Karniadakis, Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations, J. Fluid Mech. 861, 119 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Cheng, H. Meng, Y. Z. Li, and G. T. Zhang, Deep learning based on PINN for solving 2 DOF vortex induced vibration of cylinder, Ocean Eng. 240, 109932 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Fang, and J. Zhan, Deep physical informed neural networks for metamaterial design, IEEE Access 8, 24506 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Pfau, J. S. Spencer, A. G. D. G. Matthews, and W. M. C. Foulkes, Ab initio solution of the many-electron Schrödinger equation with deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033429 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, Physics-informed machine learning, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. D. Jagtap, K. Kawaguchi, and G. E. Karniadakis, Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 404, 109136 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang, and G. E. M. Karniadakis, hp-VPINNs: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 374, 113547 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Yu, L. Lu, X. Meng, and G. E. Karniadakis, Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 393, 114823 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Meng, Z. Li, D. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis, PPINN: Parareal physics-informed neural network for time-dependent PDEs, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 370, 113250 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. A. D. Jagtap, and G. Karniadakis, Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations, Commun. Comput. Phys. 28, 2002 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Wang, H. Wang, and P. Perdikaris, On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 384, 113938 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Liu, Multi-scale deep neural network (MscaleDNN) for solving Poisson-Boltzmann equation in complex domains, Commun. Comput. Phys. 28, 1970 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Wang, Y. Teng, and P. Perdikaris, Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43, A3055 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Xiang, W. Peng, X. Liu, and W. Yao, Self-adaptive loss balanced Physics-informed neural networks, Neurocomputing 496, 11 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Yu, S. Kumar, A. Gupta, S. Levine, K. Hausman, and C. Finn, in Gradient surgery for multi-task learning: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Berg, and K. Nyström, A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometries, Neurocomputing 317, 28 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Sheng, and C. Yang, PFNN: A penalty-free neural network method for solving a class of second-order boundary-value problems on complex geometries, J. Comput. Phys. 428, 110085 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Gao, L. Sun, and J. X. Wang, PhyGeoNet: Physics-informed geometry-adaptive convolutional neural networks for solving parameterized steady-state PDEs on irregular domain, J. Comput. Phys. 428, 110079 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Wu, M. Zhu, Q. Tan, Y. Kartha, and L. Lu, A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networks, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 403, 115671 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Z. Mao, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 360, 112789 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G. E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, SIAM Rev. 63, 208 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. M. A. Nabian, R. J. Gladstone, and H. Meidani, Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance sampling, Comput. aided Civil Eng 36, 962 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. Gao, and C. Wang, Active learning based sampling for high-dimensional nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 475, 111848 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Zeng, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zou, Adaptive deep neural networks methods for high-dimensional partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 463, 111232 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. J. M. Hanna, J. V. Aguado, S. Comas-Cardona, R. Askri, and D. Borzacchiello, Residual-based adaptivity for two-phase flow simulation in porous media using physics-informed neural networks, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 396, 115100 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Subramanian, R. M. Kirby, M. W. Mahoney, and A. Gholami, Adaptive self-supervision algorithms for physics-informed neural networks, arXiv: 2207.04084.

  38. A. Daw, J. Bu, S. Wang, P. Perdikaris, and A. Karpatne, Rethinking the importance of sampling in physics-informed neural networks, arXiv: 2207.02338.

  39. K. Tang, X. Wan, and C. Yang, DAS: A deep adaptive sampling method for solving partial differential equations, arXiv: 2112.14038.

  40. M. Rosenblatt, Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function, Ann. Math. Statist. 27, 832 (1956).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. E. Parzen, On estimation of a probability density function and mode, Ann. Math. Statist. 33, 1065 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. P. H. Chiu, J. C. Wong, C. Ooi, M. H. Dao, and Y. S. Ong, CAN-PINN: A fast physics-informed neural network based on coupled-automatic-numerical differentiation method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 395, 114909 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. D. P. Kingma, and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv: 1412.6980.

  44. D. C. Liu, and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization, Math. Programm. 45, 503 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. C. Rao, H. Sun, and Y. Liu, Physics-informed deep learning for incompressible laminar flows, Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 10, 207 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Y. Sun, U. Sengupta, and M. Juniper, Physics-informed deep learning for simultaneous surrogate modeling and PDE-constrained optimization of an airfoil geometry, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 411, 116042 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Y. Liu, W. Liu, X. Yan, S. Guo, and C. Zhang, Adaptive transfer learning for PINN, J. Comput. Phys. 490, 112291 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. X. Jin, S. Cai, H. Li, and G. E. Karniadakis, NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 426, 109951 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. L. Liu, S. Liu, H. Xie, F. Xiong, T. Yu, M. Xiao, L. Liu, and H. Yong, Discontinuity computing using physics-informed neural networks, J. Sci. Comput. 98, 22 (2024).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 92152301), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFB4300200), and the Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2023-ZDLGY-27).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author contributions Jiahao Song: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Wenbo Cao: Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing. Fei Liao: Methodology, Supervision. Weiwei Zhang: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Zhang  (张伟伟).

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Cao, W., Liao, F. et al. VW-PINNs: A volume weighting method for PDE residuals in physics-informed neural networks. Acta Mech. Sin. 41, 324140 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-024-24140-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-024-24140-x

Navigation