An oracle based method to compute a coupled equilibrium in a model of international climate policy

• Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 16:159–178

  Google Scholar 

• Babonneau F, Beltran C, Haurie A, Tadonki C, Vial J-P (2006) Proximal-accpm: a versatile based optimization method. In: Kontoghiorghes EJ (ed) Optimisation, econometric and financial analysis.Advances in computational management science, vol 9. Springer, Boston, pp 3–23

  Google Scholar 

• Bernard A, Haurie A, Vielle M, Viguier L (2005) A two-level dynamic game of carbon emissions trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries. J Econ Dyn Control (submitted for publication)

• Bernard A, Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Vielle M, Viguier L (2003) Russia’s role in the Kyoto protocol. Report 98, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, June

• Bernard A, Vielle M (1998) La structure du modèle GEMINI-E3. Econ Prévis 5(136)

• Bernard A, Vielle M (2000) Comment allouer un coût global d’environnement entre pays: permis négociables versus taxes ou permis négociables et taxes? Econ Int 2(82)

• Bernard A, Vielle M (2003) Measuring the welfare cost of climate change policies: a comparative assessment based on the computable general equilibrium model GEMINI-E3. Environ Model Assessm 8(3):199–217

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bernard A, Vielle M, Viguier L (2005) Carbon tax and international emissions trading: a swiss perspective. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) Coupling climate and economic dynamics. Springer, Heidelberg

  Google Scholar 

• Buchner B, Carraro C, Cersonimo I, Marchiori C (2005) Back to Kyoto? US participation and the linkage between R&D and climate cooperation. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) The coupling of climate and economic dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–204

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1996) R&D cooperation and the stability of international environmental agreements. In: Carraro C (ed) International environmental negotiations. Kluwer Academic Publishers

• Ferris MC, Munson TS (2000) Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. J Econ Dyn Control 24:165–188

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ferris MC, Pang JS (1997) Complementarity and variational problems: state of the art. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia

  Google Scholar 

• Goffin JL, Haurie A, Vial J-Ph (1992) Decomposition and nondifferentiable optimization with the projective algorithm. Manage Sci 37:284–302

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A (1995) Environmental coordination in dynamic oligopolistic markets. Group Decis Negotiat 4:46–67

  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A, Krawczyk J (1997) Optimal charges on river effluent from lumped and distributed sources. Environ Model Assessm 2:177–199

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A, Moresino F (2002) S-adapted oligopoly equilibria and approximations in stochastic variational inequalities. Ann Oper Res 114:183–201

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A, Moresino F, Viguier L (2005) A two-level differential game of international emissions trading. In: HAurie A, Raghavan TES (eds) Advances in dynamic games and applications, vol 8. Birkhäuser, Boston (in press)

• Haurie A, Smeers Y, Zaccour G (1990) Stochastic equilibrium programming for dynamic oligopolistic markets. J Optim Theory Appl 66:243–253

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A, Viguier L (2003) A stochastic game of carbon emissions trading. Environ Model Assessm 8(3):239–248

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haurie A, Zaccour G (1995) Differential game models of global environmental management. In: Carraro C, Filar JA (eds) Game-theoretic models of the environment. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 3. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 3–23

  Google Scholar 

• Hertel TW (1997) Global trade analysis: modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• IEA (2002) Beyond Kyoto. Energy dynamics and climate stabilisation. OECD/IEA, Paris

• Luo Z-Q, Goffin J-L, Ye Y (1996) Complexity analysis of an interior cutting plane for convex feasibility problems. SIAM J Optim 6:284–302

  Google Scholar 

• Knutti R, Meehl GA, Allen MR, Stainforth DA (2006) Constraining climate sensitivity from the seasonal cycle in surface temperature. J Climate 19(17):4224–4233

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nesterov Y, Nemirovskii A (1994) Interior point polynomial algorithm in convex programming. SIAM, Philadelphia

  Google Scholar 

• Nesterov Y, Vial J-P (1999) Homogeneous analytic center cutting plane methods for convex problems and variational inequalities. SIAM J Optim 9(2):707–728

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Philibert C (2000) How could emissions trading benefit developing countries? Energy Policy 28:947–956

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Philibert C, Pershing J (2001) Considering the options: climate targets for all countries. Climate Policy 1:211–227

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica 33(3):520–534

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stone JRN (1983) Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: an application to the pattern of British demand. Econ J 64:511–527

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Toth FL (2005) Coupling climate and economic dynamics: recent achievements and unresolved problems. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) The coupling of climate and economic dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–68

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references