Abstract
Picture-archiving and communication systems are complex entities, but at core they consist of compute processors that are networked together to store and retrieve objects. Therein lay fundamental aspects of both performance benchmarking and predicting future costs, provided one can accurately predict trends in both exam volumes and sizes. Hence, determining the correct amount of capital to reserve annually for the information technology infrastructure can be a difficult process for the administrator of a medical center. Both exam volumes and sizes tend to increase over time. In addition, users demand more compute-intensive applications and expect exam delivery to the desktop to be ever timelier despite the increase in size. Against this, storage, compute, and networking costs tend to decrease over time for the same performance level. At the end of the day, the question of whether to budget more or less capital for next year’s infrastructure is not trivial. This paper develops a methodology that uses current baseline data to predict the “ampleness” of a budget to meet future needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel EL, Reiner BI, Siddiqui KM: Ten filmless years and ten lessons: a 10th-anniversary retrospective from the Baltimore VA Medical Center. J Am Coll Radiol 1(11):824–833, 2004
Samei E, Seibert JA, Andriole K, Badano A, Crawford J, Reiner B, Flynn MJ, Chang P: AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment. Radiographics 24(1):313–334, 2004
Reiner B, Siegel E: Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging 13(2):49–54, 2000
Stewart BK: PACS: a phased implementation strategy. Adm Radiol 14(11):10–16, 1995
Dwyer SJ, Templeton AW, Martin NL, Cook LT, Lee KR, Levine E, Batnitzky S, Preston DF, Rosenthal SJ, Price HI, Anderson WH, Tarlton MA, Faszold S: Cost of managing digital diagnostic images for a 614-bed hospital. J Digit Imaging 15(4):255–60, 2002
Langer SG, Wang J: A goal based cost–benefit analysis for film vs. filmless radiology departments. J Digit Imaging 9(3):104–112, 1996
Langer SG, Wang J: Purchasing guidelines for information system software in a filmless radiology environment. J Digit Imaging 9(3):113–118, 1996
Daney C: Digital storage technology. In: Science and Reason. 2007. Available at: http://scienceandreason.blogspot.com/2007/10/digital-storage-technology.html (last accessed February 2008)
Kurzweil R: The law of accelerating returns. In: KurzweilAI. 2001. Available at: http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1 (last accessed February 2008)
Little Tech Shoppe: Historical Notes About the Cost of Hard Drive Storage Space. 1981. Available at: http://www.littletechshoppe.com/ns1625/winchest.html (last accessed February 2008)
Panzer-Steindel B: CPU, Disk and Memory Issues. CERN Large Hadron Collider Grid Computing Project. 2005. Available at: http://lcg-computing-fabric.web.cern.ch/LCG-Computing-Fabric/fabric_presentations/CPU_disk_and_memory.doc (last accessed February 2008)
Moore’s law. In: Wikipedia. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore’s_law (last accessed February 2008).
The Linux Documentation Project: The frequently asked questions about BogoMips. In: BogoMips Mini-Howto. Available at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/BogoMips/bogo-faq.html (last accessed February 2008)
IEEE 802.3. In: Wikipedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.3 (last accessed February 2008)
Dealtime. Available at: http://www0.dealtime.com/xPP-network_adapters (last accessed February 2008)
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the following for useful data: Jason Tjelta and Ken Persons, both from the author’s home institution’s IT department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Langer, S. Sustainable IT Budgeting: A Method to Determine Not to Exceed Values for Annual Infrastructure Purchases. J Digit Imaging 22, 400–404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9126-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9126-z