[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Interacting with notations: two examples of the use of a transformation system

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computers can present data in different ways to fit different tasks and different users’ experience, abilities and disabilities. Transformation frameworks allow developers and competent end-users to experiment with alternative notations more quickly, and thus discover new presentations appropriate for particular sets of circumstances. This paper illustrates this in two separate contexts: musical notations and interfaces to complex applications software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C Asakawa, A Itoh (1998) User interface of a home page reader. In: Third Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp 149–156

  2. SS Brown. Conversion of notations. Technical report UCAM-CL-TR-591, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, June 2004. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-591.pdf

  3. SS Brown and P Robinson (2003) Addressing print disabilities in adult foreign-language acquisition. In: Constantine Stephanidis (ed) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human–computer interaction (HCII 2003), Vol.4: Universal Access in HCI, pp 38–42. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  4. A Capobianco and N Carbonell. Online help: a potential contribution to universal access. In: ACM CHI 2001 Workshop No. 14. http://is4all.ics.forth.gr/chi2001/files/capobianco.pdf

  5. G Castan, M Good, P Roland (2000) Extensible markup language (XML) for music applications: an introduction. Comp Musicol 12:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  6. JR Cordy, CD Halpern, E Promislow (1998) TXL: A rapid prototyping system for programming language dialects. In: Proceedings of the international conference of computer languages, pp 280–285, Miami, FL

  7. T Elrad, RE. Filman, A Bader (2001) Aspect-oriented programming: introduction. Communications of the ACM, 44(10):29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. TRG Green and AF Blackwell (1998) Design for usability using cognitive dimensions. Tutorial session at British computer society conference on human computer Interaction HCI’98

  9. Object Technology International Inc. Eclipse platform technical overview http://www.eclipse.org/whitepapers/eclipse-overview.pdf

  10. JH Kingston (1993) The design and implementation of the Lout document formatting language. Software Prac Experience 23:1001–1041

    Google Scholar 

  11. D E Knuth (1986) The T E Xbook. Computers and typesetting. Addison-Wesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  12. D Langolff, N Jessel, D Levy (2000) MFB (music for the blind): A software able to transcribe and create musical scores into braille and to be used by blind persons. In: Proceedings of the 6th ERCIM workshop on ‘user interfaces for all’, number17 in short papers, p 6. ERCIM

  13. B McCann (1999) GOODFEEL Braille Music Translator. Dancing Dots Braille Music Technology, http://www.dancingdots.com/

  14. Cognitive dimensions of notations. TRG Green (1986) In: Alistair Sutcliffe and Linda Macaulay (eds) People and Computers V Proceedings of the 5th conference of the British computer society, pp 443–460. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. RM Stallman (1981) EMACS: The extensible, customizable, self-documenting display editor. Technical report AIM-519A, MIT artificial intelligence laboratory

  16. Constantine Stephanidis (2001) Aims and scope. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1(1):A4

  17. D Watts, S Strogatz (1998) Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393:440–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Wide Web Consortium (1999) XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thompson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK

    Silas S. Brown & Peter Robinson

Authors
  1. Silas S. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silas S. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, S.S., Robinson, P. Interacting with notations: two examples of the use of a transformation system. Univ Access Inf Soc 4, 96–104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0115-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0115-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation