Abstract
It has been argued that human and organizational factors are critical for accident analysis and safety management. The maritime domain represents a safety-critical system that has complex and temporary human collaborations. The level of collaboration includes not only human collaboration within a single ship, but also between ship-to-ship or ship-to-shore. From the safety-II perspective, these collaborations play a significant role in managing safety. Thus, this study suggests a framework to consider informal and temporary human collaborations using a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) under the safety-II perspective. The framework is based on FRAM analysis and contributes by analyzing the level of human collaboration through establishing classifications of human collaborative relationships including the specified or unspecified relationships. Further, it supports organizing findings from the analysis and the derivation of strategy using templates and rules. The analyzed findings and derived strategy ultimately aim to help human’s decision-making to adjust variable and uncertain situations by enhancing human collaboration. In particular, this framework is applied to maritime accidents analysis and safety strategy derivation. The authors believe that FRAM has the potential to be employed to other safety-critical systems and to be combined with safety analysis and management methodologies related to human collaboration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Åhman J (2013) Analysis of interdependencies within the fire fighting function on an offshore platform. LUTVDG/TVBB. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/4255227
Albery S, Borys D, Tepe S (2016) Advantages for risk assessment: evaluating learnings from question sets inspired by the FRAM and the risk matrix in a manufacturing environment. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.005
Bafoutsou G, Mentzas G (2002) Review and functional classification of collaborative systems. Int J Inf Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00013-0
Batalden BM, Sydnes AK (2014) Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU J Marit Aff. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8
Bjerga T, Aven T, Zio E (2016) Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: the cases of STAMP and FRAM. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.004
Bolstad CA, Endsley MR (2012) Tools for supporting team collaboration. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304700326
Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (2012) Taxonomy of collaborative networks forms: FInES Task Force on Collaborative Networks and SOCOLNET - Society of Collaborative Networks. In: Roots and wings. European Commission. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=fdfb44f5-c8d1-4e43-bb5b-7a267c8752d0
Celik M, Cebi S (2009) Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.09.004
Chauvin C, Lardjane S (2008) Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: collision avoidance at sea. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.01.001
Chauvin C, Lardjane S, Morel G et al (2013) Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006
de la Portela RC (2005) Maritime casualties analysis as a tool to improve research about human factors on maritime environment. J Marit Res JMR 18:3–18
de Vries L, Bligård LO (2019) Visualising safety: the potential for using sociotechnical systems models in prospective safety assessment and design. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.003
Department of Transport (1987) The MV Herald of Free Enterprise: report of court no. 8074 (merchant shipping act 1894 formal investigations department of transport). H.M. Stationery Office, UK
FRAM Model Visualizer ver. 0.4.1 (2016) http://functionalresonance.com/FMV/index.html. Accessed 4 Apr 2019
Goode N, Read GJM, van Mulken MRH et al (2016) Designing system reforms: using a systems approach to translate incident analyses into prevention strategies. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01974
Gordon RPE (1998) The contribution of human factors to accidents in the offshore oil industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 61(1–2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)80003-3
Hayward BJ, Lowe AR (2010) The migration of crew resource management training. In: Crew resource management. Academic press, USA, pp 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374946-8.10012-3
Hollnagel E (2012) FRAM, the functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems. CRC Press, USA
Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and safety-II: the past and future of safety management. CRC Press, USA
Hollnagel E, Hounsgaard J, Colligan L (2014) FRAM -a handbook for the practical use of the method. Centre for quality, accessible at http://functionalresonance.com/onewebmedia/FRAM_handbook_web-2.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2019
Johnston N, McDonald N (2017) Aviation psychology in practice. Routledge, London
Ka D (2017) Application of functional resonance analysis method for analyzing combined system accidents. Thesis, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Lee J (2018) Maritime safety analysis framework considering human collaborative relation network. Dissertation, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Lee J, Chung H (2018) A new methodology for accident analysis with human and system interaction based on FRAM: case studies in maritime domain. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.011
Li W, He M, Sun Y, Cao Q (2019) A proactive operational risk identification and analysis framework based on the integration of ACAT and FRAM. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.012
Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) (2004) Bridge watchkeeping safety study. Safety study, 1/2004. MAIB, Southampton
Moura R, Beer M, Patelli E et al (2017) Learning from accidents: interactions between human factors, technology and organisations as a central element to validate risk studies. Saf Sci 99:196–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2017.05.001
Norazahar N, Khan F, Veitch B, MacKinnon S (2014) Human and organizational factors assessment of the evacuation operation of BP Deepwater Horizon accident. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.002
Norazahar N, Khan F, Veitch B, MacKinnon S (2017) Prioritizing safety critical human and organizational factors of EER systems of offshore installations in a harsh environment. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.006
Ostergaard KJ, Summers JD (2003) A taxonomic classification of collaborative design. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED03, Stockholm
Ostergaard KJ, Summers JD (2009) Development of a systematic classification and taxonomy of collaborative design activities. J Eng Des. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820701499654
Ostergaard KJ, Wetmore WR, Divekar A et al (2005) An experimental methodology for investigating communication in collaborative design review meetings. CoDesign. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880500298520
Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents. Princeton University Press, Princeton (Original work published 1984)
Pourzanjani M (2001) Analysis of human error in co-ordinating ship’s collision avoidance action. In: Proceedings of ICCGS 2001: 2nd International Conference on collision and Grounding of Ships, Copenhagen, pp 85–91
Praetorius, G, Lundh, M, Lützhöft, M (2011) Learning from the past for pro-activity a re-analysis of the accident of the MV Herald of Free Enterprise. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium. Presses des Mines, Paris, France, pp 217–225
Praetorius G, Hollnagel E, Dahlman J (2015) Modelling vessel traffic service to understand resilience in everyday operations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.020
Rudan I, Komadina P, Ivče R (2012) Officers’ subjective near miss notion in situations of collision avoidance at sea. PROMET Traffic Transp. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i4.441
Schröder-Hinrichs JU, Hollnagel E, Baldauf M (2012) From Titanic to Costa Concordia—a century of lessons not learned. WMU J Marit Aff. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-012-0032-3
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Marine Department (2007) Report of investigation into the Collision between the Hong Kong Registered ship “Hebei Spirit” and Korean Crane Barge “Samsung No. 1” on 7 December 2007
The Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal (2008) Marine pollution accident from the collision between crane barge samsung no. 1 towed by tugboats samsung T-5 and samho T-3, and oil tanker Hebei Spirit
Tian J, Wu J, Yang Q, Zhao T (2016) FRAMA: a safety assessment approach based on functional resonance analysis method. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.002
Transport Safety Board (TSB) (1995) A safety study of the operational relationship between ship masters/watchkeeping officers and marine pilots. TSB study SM9501
Vanderhaegen F, Carsten O (2017) Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?. Technol Work, Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0405-7
Xi YT, Fang QG, Chen WJ, Hu SP (2009) Case-based HFACS for collecting, classifying and analyzing human errors in marine accidents. In: IEEM 2009-IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hong Kong, 8–11 Dec 2009
Xue Y, Fu G (2018) A modified accident analysis and investigation model for the general aviation industry: emphasizing on human and organizational factors. J Saf Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.008
Yang Q, Tian J, Zhao T (2017) Safety is an emergent property: illustrating functional resonance in air traffic management with formal verification. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.006
Yoo B (2016) Identifying safety-II requirements for situation awareness through maritime accidents analysis. Thesis, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Zhan Q, Zheng W, Zhao B (2017) A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs). Saf Sci 91:232–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.017
Zhang S, Wang J (2015) Analysis of South Korea Sewol sunken ferry accident based on behavioral safety. J Coast Res. https://doi.org/10.2112/si73-106.1
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) under Industrial Technology Innovation Program No. 10067156, ‘Development of heavy structure dimensional accuracy measurement and management software system for improving productivity in shipbuilding company.’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Yoon, W.C. & Chung, H. Formal or informal human collaboration approach to maritime safety using FRAM. Cogn Tech Work 22, 861–875 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00606-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00606-y