[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of complication after mandibular third molar surgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The successful reduction of postoperative discomfort is of great significance. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for the reduction of complication caused by impacted mandibular third molars extraction. An extensive literature search up to October 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed through CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Medline, and CNKI. Six RCTs in which involves 193 participants are included in the meta-analysis. Among them, three RCTs exhibit a moderate risk of bias, while the other three show a high bias risk. Compared with placebo laser/control group, pain is significantly reduced with LLLT on the first day (mean difference [MD] = −2.63, 95 % confidence interval [CI] −4.46 to −0.79, P = 0.005). The superiority of LLLT in pain control persists on the second day (MD = −2.34, 95 % CI −4.61 to −0.06, P = 0.04) and the third day (MD = −3.40, 95 % CI −4.12 to −2.68, P < 0.00001). Moreover, LLLT reduces an average of 4.94 mm (MD = 4.94, 95 % CI 1.53 to 8.34, P = 0.004) of trismus compared with placebo laser irradiation in the first 3 days. On the seventh day, the superiority of LLLT also persists (MD = 3.24, 95 % CI 0.37 to 6.12, P = 0.03). In the first 3 days after surgery, extraoral irradiation (MD = −0.69, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.08, P = 0.03) and intraoral combined with extraoral irradiation (MD = −0.65, 95 % CI −1.15 to −0.15, P = 0.01) reduced facial swelling significantly. On the seventh day, the intraoral combined with extraoral irradiation group (MD = −0.32, 95 % CI −0.59 to −0.06, P = 0.02) still showed benefit in relieving facial swelling. However, because of the heterogeneity of intervention and outcomes assessment and risk of bias of included trials, the efficacy is proved with limited evidence. In the future, well-designed RCTs with larger sample size will be required to provide clearer recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lago-Méndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gándara Rey JM, García-García A (2007) Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(5):979–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kreisler MB, Haj HA, Noroozi N, Willershausen BD (2004) Efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing postoperative pain after endodontic surgery—a randomized double blind clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(1):38–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I, Coleman J, Haerum B, Oskoui P, Whittaker M, Zhang RY (2004) Temperature-controlled 830-nm low-level laser therapy of experimental pressure ulcers. Photomed Laser Surg 22(6):483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pallotta RC, Bjordal JM, Frigo L, Leal Junior EC, Teixeira S, Marcos RL, Ramos L, Messias Fde M, Lopes-Martins RA (2011) Infrared (810-nm) low-level laser therapy on rat experimental knee inflammation. Lasers Med Sci 27(1):71–78

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pires D, Xavier M, Araújo T, Silva JA Jr, Aimbire F, Albertini R (2010) Low-level laser therapy (LLLT; 780 nm) acts differently on mRNA expression of anti- and pro-inflammatory mediators in an experimental model of collagenase-induced tendinitis in rat. Lasers Med Sci 26(1):85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silveira PC, Silva LA, Freitas TP, Latini A, Pinho RA (2010) Effects of low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) at different wavelengths and doses on oxidative stress and fibrogenesis parameters in an animal model of wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 26(1):125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Araya I, Yanine N, Beyene J, Shah PS (2012) Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(8):1789–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth (Technology Appraisal Guidance - No. 1). Available from http://www.nice.org.uk/

  11. Buyukkurt MC, Güngörmüş M, Kaya O (2006) The effect of a single dose prednisolone with and without diclofenac on pain, trismus, and swelling after removal of mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(12):1761–1766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.0.1). Chichester, Wiley, 2008, p 7.1

  13. Higgins J, Altman D, Sterne J: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins J, Green S (eds): Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration 2011, Chapter 8

  14. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D: Addressing reporting biases, in Higgins J, Green S (eds): Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration 2008, chapter 10

  15. Marković AB, Todorović L (2006) Postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: contribution of the use of long-acting local anesthetics, low-power laser, and diclofenac. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(5):e4–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marković AB, Todorovic LJ (2007) Effectiveness of dexamethasone and low-power laser in minimizing oedema after third molar surgery: a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36(3):226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aras MH, Güngörmüş M (2009) The effect of low-level laser therapy on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of a lower third molar. Photomed Laser Surg 27(1):21–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aras MH, Güngörmüş M (2010) Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)—intraoral and extraoral—on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar. Lasers Med Sci 25(5):641–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fikácková H, Navratilova B, Dylevsky I (2003) Assessment of the effect of non-invasive laser on the process of healing of an extraction wound by infrared thermography: preliminary study. J Appl Biomed 1:6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amarillas-Escobar ED, Toranzo-Fernández JM, Martínez-Rider R (2010) Use of therapeutic laser after surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(2):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. López-Ramírez M, Vílchez-Pérez MA, Gargallo-Albiol J, Arnabat-Domínguez J, Gay-Escoda C (2012) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of pain, facial swelling, and postoperative trismus after a lower third molar extraction. A preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci 27(3):559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kazancioglu HO, Ezirganli S, Demirtas N (2013) Comparison of the influence of ozone and laser therapies on pain, swelling, and trismus following impacted third-molar surgery. Lasers Med Sci(Mar 14)

  23. Neckel C, Kukiz P (2001) Biostimulation. A comparative study in the postoperative outcome of patients after third molar extraction. J Oral Laser Appl 1:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A (2012) Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(6):556–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pesevska S, Nakova M, Ivanovski K, Angelov N, Kesic L, Obradovic R, Mindova S, Nares S (2010) Dentinal hypersensitivity following scaling and root planing: comparison of low-level laser and topical fluoride treatment. Lasers Med Sci 25(5):647–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. He WL, Li CJ, Liu ZP et al (2013) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of orthodontic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 28(6):1581–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lievens PC (1991) The effect of the combined HeNe and IR laser treatment on the regeneration of the lymphatic system during the process of wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 6:189–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alghamdi KM, Kumar A, Moussa NA (2011) Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells. Lasers Med Sci 27(1):237–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carrillo JS, Calatayud J, Manso FJ (1990) A randomized double blind clinical trial on the effectiveness of helium–neon laser in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus after removal of impacted third molars. Int Dent J 40(1):31–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oikarinen K (1991) Postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand 49:7–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fikácková M, Petrini M, Trentini P, Perfetti G, Spoto G (2013) Effect of low-level laser therapy after extraction of impacted lower third molars. Lasers Med Sci 28(3):845–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Taube S, Piironen J, Ylipaavalniemi P (1990) Helium–neon laser therapy in the prevention of postoperative swelling and pain after wisdom tooth extraction. Proc Finn Dent Soc 86(1):23–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fernando S, Hill CM, Walker R (1993) A randomised double blind comparative study of low level laser therapy following surgical extraction of lower third molar teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31(3):170–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Røynesdal AK, Björnland T, Barkvoll P, Haanaes HR (1993) The effect of soft-laser application on postoperative pain and swelling. A double-blind, crossover study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22(4):242–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Braams JW, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Roodenburg JL, van der Weele LT (1994) Treatment with soft laser. The effect on complaints after the removal of wisdom teeth in the mandible. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 101(3):100–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Number 366 Jiangnandadao Road, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    W. L. He, J. Pan, R. Zhuang & P. J. Duan

  2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Stomatological Hospital, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

    F. Y. Yu & C. J. Li

Authors
  1. W. L. He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Y. Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. J. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. J. Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, W.L., Yu, F.Y., Li, C.J. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of complication after mandibular third molar surgery. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1779–1788 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1634-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1634-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation