Abstract
There are two natural efficiency measures associated with microfinance banking: social efficiency, measuring to what extent the micro-capital becomes accessible to the smallest entrepreneurs with no previous access to external funding, and financial efficiency, measuring the sustainability of the microfinance business and its attractiveness for investors providing the funds. We study the relationship between the two objectives (which might be incompatible in some cases) on a panel of 579 microfinance institutions across 36 Sub-Saharan African countries in period 2004–2017, covering the Big Crisis, and identify determinants of both types of efficiency. The main analytic tool is data envelopment analysis. We also study further relations between the microfinance sector and institutional factors of the corresponding economy, such as the presence of the World Bank programs or mandatory caps on interest rates. The main findings are as follows. Microfinance institutions focusing on lending to small and medium enterprises demonstrate a higher level of efficiency (both social and financial). Gender focus of the lending institutions also has a significant influence on the efficiency. The presence of the private credit bureau on a market is associated with significantly higher efficiency levels in both social and financial aspects. Public credit registers, however, are not associated with a positive efficiency trend. The presence of general microfinance legislation shows no significant influence, however the mandatory interest rate cap seems to affect the performance. In general, the research indicated no strong evidence of mutual exclusiveness of the social and financial objectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams J, Ivatury G (2003). The market for foreign investment in microfinance: opportunities and challenges. https://www.cgap.org/about/key-documents/cgap-annual-report-2003
Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1264
Balkenhol B (2008) The impact of the current financial crisis on microfinance. Finance Bien Commun 31–32(2):79–83
Bassem BS (2008) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in the Mediterranean: an application of DEA. Transit Stud Rev 15(2):343–354
Ben Soltane B (2014) Total factor productivity change of MENA microfinance institutions: a Malmquist Productivity Index approach. Econ Model 39:182–189
Bhatt N, Tang S-Y (2001) Delivering microfinance in developing countries: controversies and policy perspectives. Policy Stud J 29(2):319–333
Bibi K, Ahmad SH (2015) Productivity change in microfinance institutions in Sarrc region: a Malmquist Productivity Index approach. J Bus Financ Affairs 4(1):1–7
Churchill CF (1999) Client focused lending: the art of individual lending. Calmeadows. ISBN: 978-0921340058
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Cull R, Demirguc-Kunt A, Morduch J (2007) Financial performance and outreach: a global analysis of leading microbanks. Econ J 117(517):107–133
Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 243–267
Di Bella G (2011) The impact of the global financial crisis on microfinance and policy implications. IMF working papers, vol 11, no 175, p 1
Efendic V, Hadziahmetovic N (2017) The social and financial efficiency of microfinance institutions: the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. South East Eur J Econ Bus 12(2):85–101
Emrouznejad A, De Witte K (2010) COOPER-framework: a unified process for non-parametric projects. Eur J Oper Res 207(3):1573–1586
Emrouznejad A, Thanassoulis E (2010) Performance improvement management software (PIMsoft): a user guide. www.DEAsoftware.co.uk
Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19(1):150–162
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Fluckiger Y, Vassiliev A (2007) Efficiency in microfinance institutions: an application of data envelopment analysis to MFIs in Peru. In: Balkenhol B (ed) Microfinance and public policy. International Labour Organization (ILO) century series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230300026_6
Gebremichael BZ, Rani DL (2012) Total factor productivity change of Ethiopian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): a Malmquist Productivity Index approach (MPI). Eur J Bus Manag 4(3):105–114
Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Mar Molinero C (2007) Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega 35(2):131–142
Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Mar Molinero C (2009) Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. J Oper Res Soc 60(1):104–119
Halická M, Trnovská M (2018) The Russell measure model: computational aspects, duality, and profit efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 268(1):386–397
Halická M, Trnovská M (2019) Duality and profit efficiency for the hyperbolic measure model. Eur J Oper Res 278(2):410–421
Halická M, Trnovská M (2021) A unified approach to non-radial graph models in data envelopment analysis: common features, geometry, and duality. Eur J Oper Res 289(2):611–627
Haq M, Skully M, Pathan S (2010) Efficiency of microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pac Financ Mark 17(1):63–97
Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D (2007) Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence. Appl Econ 39(10):1207–1222
Kabir Hassan KM, Sanchez B (2009) Efficiency analysis of microfinance institutions in developing countries. Networks Financial Institute Working Paper 2009-WP-12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492238
Kar AK, Rahman S (2018) Changes in total factor productivity and efficiency of microfinance institutions in the developing world: a non-parametric approach. Econ Anal Policy 60:103–118
Khalily B (2004) Quantitative approach to impact analysis of microfinance programmes in Bangladesh—what have we learned? J Int Dev 16(3):331–353
Kipesha EF (2012) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in East Africa: a data envelopment analysis. Eur J Bus Manag 4(17):77–88
Koveos P, Randhawa D (2004) Financial services for the poor: assessing microfinance institutions. Managerial Finance 30(9):70–95
Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M (2010) Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: semi-parametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints. J Prod Anal 38(1):1–18
Lensink R, Meesters A, Hermes, N (2008) Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions: is there a trade-off? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1143925
Mersland R, Strøm RØ (2014) Microfinance financial and social performance: an introduction. In: Microfinance institutions. Palgrave studies in impact finance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399663_1
Mia MA, Chandran VGR (2016) Measuring financial and social outreach productivity of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Soc Indic Res 127(2):505–527
Morduch J (1999) The microfinance promise. J Econ Lit 37:1569–1614
Nanayakkara G, Iselin ER (2012) An exploratory study of the performance of microfinancing institutions using the balanced scorecard approach. Int J Bus Inf 7(2):165–204
Nghiem HS, Coelli T, Rao P (2006) The efficiency of microfinance in Vietnam: evidence from NGO schemes in the north and the central region. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 25:71–78
Pal D (2010) Measuring technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India. Indian J Agric Econ 65(4):639–657
Reille X, Forster S (2008) Foreign capital investment in microfinance balancing social and financial returns. https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/CGAP-Focus-Note-Foreign-Capital-Investment- in-Microfinance-Balancing-Social-and-Financial-Returns-Feb-2008.pdf
Sedzro K, Keita M (2009) Assessing the efficiency of microfinance institutions using data envelopment analysis. J Int Finance Econ 9(2):54–68
Skinner J (1994) What do stochastic frontier cost functions tell us about inefficiency? J Health Econ 13(3):323–328
Stolp C (1990) Strengths and weaknesses of data envelopment analysis: an urban and regional perspective. Comput Environ Urban Syst 14(2):103–116
Tahir I, Tahrim S (2013) Efficiency analysis of microfinance institutions in ASEAN: a DEA approach. Bus Manag Dyn 3(4):13–23
Tahir I, Tahrim S (2014) Efficiency and productivity analysis of microfinance institutions in Cambodia: a DEA approach. In: Proceedings of Eurasia business research conference, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 16–18
Von Stauffenberg D, Jansson T, Kenyon N, Barluenga-Badiola M (2003) Performance indicators for microfinance institutions: technical guide, 3rd edn. CGAP MicroRate and Inter-American Development Bank, Washington
Widiarto I, Emrouznejad A (2015) Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analysis application. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 50:1–17
Widiarto I, Emrouznejad A, Anastasakis L (2017) Observing choice of loan methods in not-for-profit microfinance using data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 82:278–290
Zeller M, Meyer RL (2002) The triangle of microfinance: financial sustainability, outreach, and impact. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation Project 19-02773S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soldátková, N., Černý, M. Microfinance in Sub-Saharan Africa: social efficiency, financial efficiency and institutional factors. Cent Eur J Oper Res 30, 449–477 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-021-00789-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-021-00789-8