[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Application of multicriteria decision aid for evaluation of ICT usage in business

  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The different types of business management systems provide the functionality for management of business enterprises by enabling the maintaining of data about the management of all types of resources used in business. The statistical data helps us in revealing of information about the functioning of enterprises and the implementation of information communication technologies (ICT). Our research area concerns the methods for evaluation of ICT access and usage in businesses and possibilities to evaluate a variety of different types of used systems. The access and usage of ICT by business enterprises have differences and is quite complex for evaluation. Countries provide statistical data about the level of ICT usage. An approach presented by this research include some methods for multi-criteria decision support by applying the TOPSIS, AHP and SAW methods. As the case study we demonstrate the evaluation of ICT usage in small and medium enterprises of business of Lithuania in comparison with other countries. The TOPSIS method provides the structure of decision making which help to evaluate the distance between the level of ICT usage in business of some countries of EU. Empirical research results show disparities of evaluation of countries by ICT usage in business according to the dynamic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Prepared by following M. Porter’s value chain model, and Saha (2011)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arsanjani A, Bharade N, Borgenstrand M, Schume P, Keith Wood J, Zheltonogov V (2015) Business process management design guide: using IBM business process manager. An IBM Redbooks publication, p 272. Accessed internet: ibm.com/redbooks

  • Bazaras D, Ledauskaite K, Palsaitis R (2010) Comparable analysis of information and communication technologies in lithuania and finland. Transport 25(1):98–104. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedeley RT, Ghoshal T, Iyer LS, Bhadury J (2018) Business analytics and organizational value chains: a relational mapping. J Comput Inf Syst 58(2):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1220238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocij P, Greasley A, Hicke S (2015) Business information systems: technology development for the ebusiness. 5th edn. Pearson, p 736

  • Ceric A (2015) Bringing together evaluation and management of ICT value: a systems theory approach. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 18(1):19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzemydienė D, Baltrušaitis R (2015) Evaluation of functionality of business management systems for effective implementation in complex business processes. Baltic J Mod Comput 3(3):179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzemydienė D, Arbataitis E, Dzemyda I (2019) The design approach of knowledge-based management system for control of manufacturing processes of woven fabrics. Baltic J Mod Comput 7(2):211–223. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2019.7.2.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale PT, Banwait SS, Laroiya SC (2010) Performance evaluation of ERP implementation in Indian SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 21(6):758–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi J, Somers TM, Bhattacherjee A (2007) The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: a factor-based study. J Manag Inf Syst 24(1):101–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohling R, Pacheco A (2015) A topsis: an approach based on topsis for ranking evolutionary algorithms. Procedia Comput Sci 55:308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law CCH, Ngai EWT (2007) ERP systems adoption: an exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP successes. Inf Manag 44(4):418–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Park G, Yoon B, Park J (2010) Open innovation in SMEs: an intermediated network model. Res Policy 39(2):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovic O (2007) The next stage of operational business intelligence: creating new challenges for business process management. In: Proceedings of 40th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS, IEEE, p 1–10

  • Mastilo Z (2017) Impact of digital growth in modern business. Bus Manag Stud 3(4):1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memariania A, Aminib A, Alinezhadc A (2009) Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives. J Ind Eng 4(2009):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller C (2005) ERP II: a conceptual framework for next-generation enterprise systems? J Enterp Inf Manag 18(4):483–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G (2003) A meta-analysis of research on information technology implementation in small business. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 13(2):91–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A (2011) Mapping of Porter’s value chain activities into business functional units. http://www.managementexchange.com/hack/mapping-porter%E2%80%99s-value-chain-activities-business-functional-units

  • Shaul L, Tauber D (2012) CSFs along ERP life-cycle in SMEs: a field study. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(3):360–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiels H, McIvor R, O’Reilly D (2003) Understanding the implications of ICT adoption: insights from SMEs. Logist Inf Manag 16(5):312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z (2016) A framework for developing management intelligent systems. Int J Syst Serv Oriented Eng (IJSSOE) 6(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSOE.2016010103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taticchi P, Tonelli F, Cagnazzo L (2010) Performance measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Meas Bus Excell 14(1):4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wier B, Hunton J, Hassabelnaby HR (2007) Enterprise resource planning systems and non-financial performance incentives: the joint impact on corporate performance. Int J Account Inf Syst 8(3):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Turskis Z, Tamošaitienė J (2009) Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica 20(2):305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Mardani A, Turskis Z, Jusoh A, Nor KMD (2016) Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: an overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(03):645–682. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Akademijos Str. 4, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Dalė Dzemydienė

  2. Department of Economic Policy, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio Av. 9, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Giedrė Dzemydaitė

  3. Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Av. 11, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Dinesh Gopisetti

  4. V. R. Siddhartha Engineering College, NH-9, Kanuru, AP, India

    Dinesh Gopisetti

Authors
  1. Dalė Dzemydienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giedrė Dzemydaitė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dinesh Gopisetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalė Dzemydienė.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dzemydienė, D., Dzemydaitė, G. & Gopisetti, D. Application of multicriteria decision aid for evaluation of ICT usage in business. Cent Eur J Oper Res 30, 323–343 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00691-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00691-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation