[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Temporal Changes in Socio-Ecological Systems and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services at Different Governance Scales: A Case Study of Heathlands

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heathlands are considered biodiversity hotspots of high conservation interest. However, they are at risk of degradation and disappearance in most parts of Europe mainly due to land abandonment, degradation, and conversion to other land uses. Heathlands are semi-natural systems: their maintenance and survival depends on specific practices such as extensive grazing or burning. Traditionally they provide a wide range of goods and services to societies. In this study we used the ecosystem services (ES) framework to analyze the changes in the demand for and delivery of ES for the heathland landscapes of the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain), since the 1950s. Particularly, we analyzed how the social changes since the 1950s have determined changes in stakeholders’ demand for provisioning, cultural and regulating services and how these changes have influenced the vegetation dynamics and conservation status of these systems. We identified a general shift from the provisioning of grazing facilities and local products for the local-regional market to the provisioning of conservation services to satisfy national–international demand. For the present situation we found a clear mismatch between the conservation demand, management practices, and land-use forms. This mismatch threatens to lead to further landscape changes and loss of biodiversity. The results of our multi-scale and -services study can help to increase awareness of the value of currently obtainable benefits from heathlands among stakeholders and managers. The ES approach can improve understanding of the functioning of the socio-ecological heathland system, and inform the development of new management strategies for heathland protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso I, Weston K, Gregg R, Morecroft M. 2012. Carbon storage by habitat—review of the evidence of the impacts of management decisions and condition on carbon stores and sources. Natural England Research Reports 43. http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NERR043.

  • Anon. 1992. Council Directive of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC). European Commission, Brussels, BE

  • Anon. 2005. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No. 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).

  • Anon. 2009. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (this is the codified version of Directive 79/4097/EEC as amended). European Commission, Brussels, BE

  • Bartolomé J, Plaixats J, Fanlo R, Boada M. 2005. Conservation of isolated Atlantic heathlands in the Mediterranean region: effects of land-use changes in the Montseny biosphere reserve (Spain). Biol Conserv 122:81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco JC, González JL, Eds. 1992. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. Colección Técnica. ICONA. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. www.marm.es.

  • Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Beaufoy G. 2004. Application of the DPSIR (Driving forces, Pressures, State, Impact, Response) framework for the identification of the habitats depending on the transhumance. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Jongman, RHG, Gómez-Sal A, Herzong F, Austad I, editors. Transhumance and biodiversity in European Mountains. Report of the EU-FP5 project TRASHUMONT (EVK2-CT-2002-80017). IALE, Wageningen. p. 285–302.

  • Cameron KH, Leather SR. 2012. Heathland management effects on carabid beetle communities: the relationship between bare ground patch size and carabid biodiversity. J Insect Conserv 16:523–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo L, Alonso I, Marcos E, de Luis E. 2007. Effects of cutting and nitrogen deposition on biodiversity in Cantabrian heathlands. Appl Veg Sci 10:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo L, Tárrega R, de Luis E. 2002a. Regeneration patterns in a Calluna vulgaris heathland in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain): effects of burning, cutting and ploughing. Acta Oecol 23:81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo L, Tárrega R, de Luis E. 2002b. The dynamics of Mediterranean shrub species over 12 years of following perturbations. Plant Ecol 160:25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo L, Tárrega R, de Luis E. 2002c. Secondary succession after perturbations in a shrubland community. Acta Oecol 23:393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo L, Tárrega R, Luis E, Valbuena L, Marcos E. 2005. Recovery after experimental cutting and burning in three shrub communities with different dominant species. Plant Ecol 180:175–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celaya R, Jáuregui BM, García RR, Benavices R, García U, Osoro K. 2010. Changes in heathland vegetation under goat grazing: effect of breed and stoking rate. Appl Veg Sci 13:125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celaya R, Oliván M, Ferreira LMM, Martínez A, García U, Osoro K. 2007. Comparison of grazing behaviour, dietary overlap and performance in non-lactating domestic ruminants grazing on marginal heathlands areas. Livest Sci 106:271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, ven der Belt M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta D, Taboada A, Calvo L, Salgado JM. 2006. Carabid beetle assemblage and vegetation community structure in Calluna vulgaris heathlands in NW Spain. A first survey. Entomol Fennica 17:241–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Ed. 1997. Nature’s services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Polansky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers Ecol Env 7:21–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bello F, Lavorel S, Gerhold P, Reier Ü, Pärtel M. 2010. A biodiversity monitoring framework for practical conservation of grasslands and shrublands. Biol Conserv 143:9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Blust G. 2007. Heathland, an ever changing landscape. In: Pedroli B, Van Doorn A, De Blust G, Paracchini ML, Wascher D, Bunce F, Eds. Europe’s living landscapes. Essays on exploring our identity in the countryside. LANDSCAPE EUROPE, Wageningen: KNNV Publishing, Zeist. p. 179–92.

  • García A. 2009. Los Vaqueiros de Alzada de Asturias. Un estudio histórico-antropológico. KRK eds., Oviedo. 1088 pp.

  • Garzón-Heydt J. 2004. Recovering transhumance in Spain for long-term nature conservation. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Jongman, RHG, Gómez-Sal A, Herzong F, Austad I, Eds. Transhumance and biodiversity in European Mountains. Report of the EU-FP5 project TRASHUMONT (EVK2-CT-2002-80017). IALE, Wageningen. p. 259–63.

  • Gómez- Sal A, Llorente I. 2004. The present status and ecological consequences of transhumance in Spain. Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Jongman, RHG, Gómez-Sal A, Herzong F, Austad I, Eds. Transhumance and biodiversity in European Mountains. Report of the EU-FP5 project TRASHUMONT (EVK2-CT-2002-80017). IALE, Wageningen. p. 233–48.

  • Gomez-Sal A, Alvarez J, Muñoz M, Rebollo S. 1993. Patterns of change in the agrarian landscape in an area of the Cantabrian Mountains. Assessment by transition probabilities. In: Bunce R, Ryszkowky L, Paoletti M, Eds. Landscape ecology and agroecosystems. Boca Raton: Lewis Publish. p. 141–52.

  • Gómez-Sal A, Rodríguez M. 1992. Cuadernos de la trashumancia No.3: Montaña de León. ICONA, Madrid. 98 p.

  • Gimingham CH. 1992. The lowland heathland management handbook. Peterborough: English Nature Science. 200 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampe A, Petit RJ. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Berry PM, Bugter R, de Bello F, Feld CK, Grandin U, Harrington R, Haslett JR, Jongman RHG, Luck GW, da Silva PM, Moora M, Settele J, Sousa JP, Zobel M. 2010. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiv Conserv 19:2791–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslett JR, Berry PM, Bela G, Jongman RHG, Pataki G, Samways MJ, Zobel M. 2010. Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiv Conserv 19:2963–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2011. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org.

  • Jack BK, Kousky C, Sims RE. 2008. Designing payment for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc Nat Am Soc 28:9465–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH. 2002. Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas JA, Settele J. 2006. Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme M, Kaland PE, Brekke NG, Eds. 2004. Conservation and management of north European coastal heathlands. Case study: The Heathland Centre, Lygra, Western Norway. HEATHGUARD. The Heathland Centre, Norway

  • Lago J, Sevilla L. 2008. Análisis DAFO de los Picos de Europa de Castilla y León. Pecvnia 7:125–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasanta T, Arnáez J, Errea MP, Ortigosa L, Ruiz-Flaño P. 2009. Mountain pastures, environmental degradation, and landscape remediation: the example of a Mediterranean policy initiative. Appl Geogr 29:308–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite AS, Ed. 2004. Conservation and management of South-West European mountainous Heathlands. Case study: Penedas-Gerês National Park, Northern Portugal. HEATHGUARD. The Heathland Centre, Norway

  • Luck GW, Harrington R, Harrison PA, Kremen C, Berry PM, Bugter R, Dawson TP, de Bello F, Díaz S, Feld CK, Haslett JR, Hering D, Kontogianni A, Lavorel S, Rousevell M, Samways MJ, Sandin L, Settele J, Sykes MT, van den Hove S, Vandewalle M, Zobel M. 2009. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 59:223–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor M. 2002. Pasture landscapes and nature conservation. In: Redecker B, Finck P, Härdtle W, Riecken U, Schröder E, Eds. Landscapes of Northern Spain and pastoral systems. Berlin: Springer. p. 67–86.

  • McDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, Lazpita JG, Gibon A. 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manage 59:47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being : current state and trends. Findings of the conditions and trends working group. Washington, DC: Island Press

  • Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen A, Nilsen LS, Aasmundsen A, Oterholm AI. 2006. Woodland regeneration in a coastal heathland area in central Norway. Nor J Geogr 60:277–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morán-Ordóñez A, Suárez-Seoane S, Calvo L, de Luis E. 2011. Using predictive models as a spatially explicit support tool for managing cultural landscapes. Appl Geogr 31:839–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morán-Ordóñez A, Suárez-Seoane S, Elith E, Calvo L, De Luis E. 2012. Satellite surface reflectance improves habitat distribution mapping: a case study on heath and shrub formations in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain). Diversit Distributions 18:588–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson E, Mace GM, Armsworth PR, Atkinson G, Buckle S, Clements T, Ewers RM, Fa JE, Gardner TA, Gibbons J, Greyer R, Metcalfe R, Mourato S, Muuls M, Osborn D, Reuman DC, Watson C, Milner-Gulland EJ. 2009. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing word. J Appl Ecol 46:1139–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osoro K, Olivan M, Martínez A, García U, Celaya R. 2003. Diet selection and live weight changes in domestic ruminants grazing on heathland vegetation with areas of improved pasture. In: Herrera-Camacho J, Sandovalcastro CA, Eds. Matching herbivore nutrition to ecosystems biodiversity. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, Facultad de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán (México). p. 491–4.

  • Ostermann OP. 1998. The need for management of nature conservation sites designated under Natura 2000. J Appl Ecol 35:968–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correia T, Bunce RGH, Howard DC, Eds. 2005. Landscape ecology and management of Atlantic mountains. Proceedings of the joint APEP and IALE (UK) conference. IALE Publication series number 2.

  • Redford KH, Adams WM. 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conserv Biol 4:785–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescia AJ, Pons A, Lomba I, Esteban C, Dover JW. 2008. Reformulating the social-ecological system in a cultural rural mountain landscape in the Picos de Europa region (northern Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 88:23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, O’Farrell PJ, Cowling RM, Egoh BN, Le Maitre DC, Vlok JHJ. 2009. Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Soc 14:38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork S, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11:28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez M. 2004. La trashumancia: cultura, cañadas y viajes (5ª Edición). Ed. Edilesa, León. p. 460.

  • Rounsevell MDA, Dawson TP, Harrison PA. 2010. A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodiv Conserv 19:2823–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rationalising Biodiversity Conservation in Dynamic Ecosystems (RUBICODE). 2009. Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. www.rubicode.net.

  • Sáenz de Buruaga M. 1985. Current and historical distribution of big mammals in the province of León (in Spanish). PhD thesis. University of León, León.

  • Tecnosylva. 2004. Caracterización y gestión de los puertos pirenaicos de la Provincia de León. Technical report. Junta de Castilla y León

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UKNEA). 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. Cambridge: UNWP-WCMC. http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/

  • Usher MB. 1992. Management and diversity of arthropods in Calluna heathland. Biodiv Conserv 1:63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace KJ. 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 139:235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS. 1955. Bracken versus heather, a study in plant sociology. J Ecol 43:490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NR. 1989. Studies on the invertebrate fauna of fragmented heathland in Dorset, UK, and the implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 47:153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NR. 2005. Combating urban pressures on European heathlands in Dorset. Bournemouth: Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel WW, Tietema A, Beier C, Emmett BA, Peñuelas J, Riss-Nielsen T. 2004. A qualitative ecosystem assessment for different shrublands in Western Europe under impact of climate change. Ecosystems 7:662–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West P, Igoe J, Brockington D. 2006. Parks and people, the social impact of protected areas. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:251–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worboys GL, Francis WL, Lockwood M, Eds. 2010. Connectivity conservation management. A global guide. London: Cromwell Press Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Junta de Castilla y León (project No. LE021A08) and the Ministry of Science and Education (project No. CGL2006-10998-C02-01/BOS). The Ministry of Education of Spain provided the PhD Scholarship for A. Morán-Ordóñez. The authors would like to thank the Fire Ecology Research Group of the University of León and the Landscape Centre of the Environmental Sciences Group (ESG) of Wageningen University and Research (WUR) for their support. We are also grateful to I. Alonso, S. Canessa, J. García-Fernández, P. Gregersen and R.H.G. Jongman for their help and comments. We would also like to thank K. Andersson and the three anonymous reviewers who provided constructive and valuable comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Área de Ecología, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, University of León, Campus de Vegazana s/n, 24071, León, Spain

    Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez, Susana Suárez-Seoane, Estanislao de Luis & Leonor Calvo

  2. Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Rob Bugter

Authors
  1. Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rob Bugter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susana Suárez-Seoane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Estanislao de Luis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Leonor Calvo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez.

Additional information

Author Contributions

AMO: conceived and designed the study, performed the research, the literature review and wrote the manuscript. RB: contributed new methods, literature review and wrote the paper. SSS, EL, and LC: conceived and designed the study and wrote the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morán-Ordóñez, A., Bugter, R., Suárez-Seoane, S. et al. Temporal Changes in Socio-Ecological Systems and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services at Different Governance Scales: A Case Study of Heathlands. Ecosystems 16, 765–782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9649-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation