Abstract
The following research questions structured our analysis: Does an open access institutional repository model respond to the needs of a non-academic documentation centre? Is EPrints software a good match to support the needs of the existing metadata describing Artexte’s collection? What are the customizations required to accommodate the existing Artexte metadata using EPrints? In order to address these questions, in this study we exported the existing metadata schema and sample data in Artexte’s three databases, performed a manual evaluation of metadata quality and compared the 49 Artexte fields to those available within the EPrints schema. We identified the metadata elements that mapped by default without the need for customization or modification and those which would need to be added to EPrints using configuration files. We also identified the customized software development to accommodate Artexte metadata using EPrints: the bilingual controlled vocabulary demands an extension of the EPrints subject taxonomy model with thesaurus semantic relationships. Comparing Artexte and EPrints metadata schemas, we found that 15 out of 49 fields mapped by default without the need for modification, 25 fields would need to be added to EPrints configuration files, and one field will be removed during the migration. With only the remaining eight fields requiring some special attention, we conclude that EPrints is suitable to the needs of Artexte’s bibliographic data management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averkamp, S., Lee J.: Repurposing ProQuest Metadata for Batch Ingesting ETDs into an Institutional Repository. code4lib journal. http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647 (2009). Accessed 3 June 2010
Bradley J., Johnstone L.: “Introduction”. Sightlines: Reading Contemporary Canadian Art. Artextes editions, Montreal (1994)
Brody T., Harnad S., Carr L.: Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J. Am. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(8), 1060–1072 (2006). doi:10.1002/asi.20373
Bruce T.R., Hillman D.: Metadata in Practice, Chap. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting, pp. 238–256. ALA Editions, Chicago (2004)
Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml (2002). Accessed 15 Aug 2011
Corrado, E.M.: The Importance of Open Access, Open Source, and Open Standards for Libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Spring 2005. http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/05-spring/article2.html (2005). Accessed 8 Aug 2011
Cruz D.: Evaluation criteria for free/open source software products based on project analysis. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11(2), 107 (2006). doi:10.1002/spip.257
Davis, P.M.: Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. Physiologist 53(6):197–201. http://www.the-aps.org/publications/tphys/2010html/December/open_access.htm (2010). Accessed 11 Aug 2011
Davis P.M., Lewenstein B.V., Simon D.H., Booth J.G., Connolly M.J.L.: Open access publishing, article downloads and citations: randomised trial. BMJ 337, a568 (2008). doi:10.1136/bmj.a568
Fay, E.: Repository Software Comparison: Building Digital Library Infrastructure at LSE. Ariadne. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/fay/ (2010). Accessed 8 August 2011
Floyd, R.: Automated electronic thesis and dissertations ingest. https://wiki.dlib.indiana.edu/display/IUSW/Automated+Electronic+Thesis+and+Dissertations+Ingest (2009). Accessed 26 May 2011
Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., Brooks, T.C.: Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. Scientometrics (2009). doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1
Gonçalves M.A., Fox E.A., Watson L.T.: Towards a digital library theory: a formal digital library ontology. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 8, 91–114 (2008). doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0033-1
Gray, A.: Institutional Repositories for Creative and Applied Arts Research: The Kultur Project. Ariadne 60. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/gray/ (2009). Accessed 3 June 2010
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2009) Functional requirements for bibliographic records. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf . Accessed 11 Aug 2011
International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (2008) RIHA resolution on copyright. http://www.riha-institutes.org/resolutioncopyright.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2011
Khoo, M., Hall, C.: Merging metadata: a sociotechnical study of crosswalking and interoperability. JCDL ’10 Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital libraries. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. June 21–25, 2010. doi:10.1145/1816123.1816180
Latour J., Tayler F.: Contemporary glocal: positioning a national mandate within a global context. Art Libr. J. 34(1), 40–45 (2009)
Lawrence, S.: Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature 411(521) (2001). doi:10.1038/35079151
Léger, D.: Le Centre d’information Artexte: un mandat, et un parcours, atypiques. Essays in the History of Art Librarianship in Canada. ARLIS Canada. http://www.arliscanada.ca/hal/ (2006). Accessed 03 June 2010
Marill, J.L., Luczak, E.C.: Evaluation of digital repository software at the national library of medicine. D-Lib Mag 15(5/6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may09/marill/05marill.html (2009). Accessed 9 Aug 2011
McKay D., Shukla P., Hunt R., Cunningham S.J.: Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4, 283–297 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0088-6
Morisio M., Seaman C.B., Basili V.R., Parra A.T., Kraft S.E., Condon S.E.: COTS-based software development: processes and open issues. J. Syst. Softw. 61, 189–199 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00147-9
Ochoa X., Duval E.: Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 10, 67–91 (2009). doi:10.1007/s00799-009-0054-4
Open Access Directory: Declarations in support of OA. http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Declarations_in_support_of_OA (2011). Accessed 11 Aug 2011
Open Access Directory: Statements by learned societies and professional associations. http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Statements_by_learned_societies_and_professional_associations (2011). Accessed 11 Aug 2011
Repository Support Project: Repository Software Survey (November 2010). http://www.rsp.ac.uk/documents/Repository-Software-Survey-2010-11.pdf (2010). Accessed 4 August 2011
Rhyno A.: Using Open Source Systems for Digital Libraries. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, Conn, London (2004)
Sale, A.: The key things to know. University of Tasmania Eprints Repository. http://eprints.utas.edu.au/223/1/NZ_Workshop_PDF.pdf (2005). Accessed 5 Aug 2011
Sheppard, V.: Metadata report. JISC. http://kultur.EPrints.org/Metadata%20report%20Final.pdf (2009). Accessed 03 June 2010
Singh, S., Pandita, N.: Building the open access self-archiving repository for the bio-medical sciences at National Informatics Centre. In: National Convention of Medical Library Association of India, 7–9 Nov 2005, Bangalore, India. http://openmed.nic.in/1108/ (2005). Accessed 11 Aug 2011
Singh, S.K., Witt, M., Dorothea, S.: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Repository Software. In: Fifth International Conference on Open Repositories. Madrid, Spain, July 2010. http://or2010.fecyt.es/Resources/documentos/GSabstracts/AComparativeAnalysisInstitutionalRepositorySoftware.pdf (2010). Accessed 4 Aug 2011
University of Southampton: EPrints—Digital Repository Software. http://www.eprints.org/software (2011). Accessed 3 June 2010
University of Southampton: Registry of Open Access Repositories (Browse by Repository Software). http://roar.eprints.org/view/software/ (2011). Accessed 10 Aug 2011
Walsh, M.P.: Batch Loading Collections into DSpace: Using Perl Scripts for Automation and Quality Control. Information Technology and Libraries 29(3): 117–127. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/lita/ital/292010/2903sep/walsh_pdf.cfm (2010). Accessed 26 June 2011
Wyles, R.: Technical Evaluation of selected Open Source Repository Solutions. Open Access Repositories in New Zealand (OARINZ) project, Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology, v1.3, 13 September 2006. http://dlynx.rhodes.edu/jspui/bitstream/10267/30/1/Repository_Evaluation_Document_NZ.pdf (2006). Accessed 9 Aug 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neugebauer, T., MacDonald, C. & Tayler, F. Artexte metadata conversion to EPrints: adaptation of digital repository software to visual and media arts documentation. Int J Digit Libr 11, 263–277 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-011-0077-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-011-0077-5