Abstract
In this article, we present a set of approaches in analysing data gathered during experimentation with exploratory search systems and users’ acts of judging the relevance of the information retrieved by the system. We present three tools for quantitatively analysing encoded qualitative data: relevance-criteria profile, relevance-judgement complexity and session visualisation. Relevance-criteria profiles capture the prominence of each criterion usage with respect to the search sessions of individuals or selected user groups (e.g. groups defined by the users affiliations and/or level of research experience). Relevance-judgement complexity, on the other hand, reflects the number of criteria involved in a single judgment process. Finally, session visualisation brings these results together in a sequential representation of criteria usage and relevance judgements throughout a session, potentially allowing the researcher to quickly detect emerging patterns with respect to interactions, relevance criteria usage and complexity. The use of these tools is demonstrated using results from a pilot-user study that was conducted at the Robert Gordon University in 2008. We conclude by highlighting how these tools might be used to support the improvement of end-user services in digital libraries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry C.L.: User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 45(3), 149–159 (1994)
Barry C.L., Schamber L.: Users’criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison. Inform. Process. Manage. 34(2–3), 219–236 (1998)
Borlund P.: The concept of relevance in IR. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 54(10), 913–925 (2003)
Borlund P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Inform. Res. 8(3), (2003)
Cervino Beresi, U.: Related scientific information: a study on user-defined relevance. Ph.D. thesis (2010)
Cleverdon, C.W., Mills, J., Keen, E.M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems, vol. 1: design, vol. 2: test results. In: Aslib Cranfield Research Project, Cranfield (1966)
Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A.: Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1993)
Mayer, R., Rauber, A.: Establishing context of digital objects’ creation, content and usage. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Innovation in Digital Preservation, Austin, TX (2009)
Hurvich L.M., Jameson D.: An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychol. Rev. 64, 384–404 (1957)
Kelly D.: Measuring online information seeking context, part 2: findings and discussion. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57(14), 1862–1874 (2006)
Kullback S., Leibler R.A.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–86 (1951)
Lin J.: Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 37, 145–151 (1991)
Savolainen R.: The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Inform. Process. Manage. 29, 13–28 (1993)
Schamber, L.: Users’criteria for evaluation in a multimedia environment. In: Proceedings of the 54 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 28, pp. 126–133 (1991)
Wang P., White M. D.: A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50(2), 98–114 (1999)
Ware C.: Color sequences for univariate maps: theory, experiments and principles. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 8(5), 41–49 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beresi, U.C., Kim, Y., Song, D. et al. Why did you pick that? Visualising relevance criteria in exploratory search. Int J Digit Libr 11, 59–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-011-0067-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-011-0067-7