[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the occurrence of donor site morbidity, cosmesis and overall satisfaction with graft procedure in 76 patients who had undergone iliac crest bone harvesting for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Totally 24 patients underwent an open procedure and 52 a minimally invasive trephine harvesting method. Although our study demonstrated substantial donor site pain and its effect on ambulation in both groups, this was of limited duration. Two patients, one in each group, suffered long-term pain that was eventually resolved. Totally 8.3% of patients in the open group suffered minor complications and 11.5% in the trephine group. There were two cases of meralgia parasthetica. There were no major complications in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity between the open and trephine groups. There was a trend towards significance (P = 0.076) for pain at the donor site, with less pain reported by patients who underwent the trephine procedure for harvesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlmann A, Patzakis M, Roidis N et al (2002) Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:716–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG et al (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop 329:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Billmire DA, Rotatori S (1994) Use of the CORB needle biopsy for the harvesting of iliac crest bone graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:416–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boustred AM, Fernandes D, Zyl AE (1997) Minimally invasive iliac cancellous bone graft harvesting. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1760–1764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burstein FD, Simms C, Cohen SR et al (2000) Iliac crest bone graft harvesting techniques: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:34–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caddy CM, Reid CD (1985) An atraumatic technique for harvesting cancellous bone for secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft palate. Br J Plast Surg 38:540–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Confidence interval around a completion rate. http://www.measuringusability.com. Accessed 10 Dec 2006

  8. Dawson KH, Egbert MA, Myall RWT (1996) Pain following iliac crest bone grafting of alveolar clefts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24:151–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eufinger H, Leppanen H (2000) Iliac crest donor site morbidity following open and closed methods of bone harvest for alveolar cleft osteoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28:31–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gagliese L, Melzak R (2006) Pain in the elderly, chap. 74 In: McMahon SB, Koltzenberg M (eds) Ward and Melzack’s textbook of pain, 5th edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghent WR (1961) Further studies on meralgia paresthetica. Can Med Assoc J 85:871–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL et al (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft: complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop 339:76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA et al (2002) Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery 50:510–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill NM, Horne JG, Devane PA (1999) Donor site morbidity in the iliac crest bone graft. Aust NZJ Surg 69:726–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ilankovan V, Telfer M, Peterson LJ et al (1998) A prospective study of trephined bone grafts of the tibial shaft and iliac crest. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:434–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi A, Kostakis GC (2004) An investigation of post-operative morbidity following iliac crest graft harvesting. Br Dent J 196:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kager AN, Marks M, Bastrom T et al (2006) Morbidity of iliac crest bone harvesting in adolescent deformity surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 26:132–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Block-Birkholz et al (2005) Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest—comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mostofsky DI, Lomrants Y (eds) (1997) Handbook of pain and ageing. Plenum Press, New York

  20. Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E et al (2004) Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prochet F, Bertrand J (1996) Unusual complications at iliac crest bone graft donor site: experience with two cases. Neurosurgery 39:856–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robertson PA, Wray AC (2001) Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery. Spine 26:1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandor GKB, Rittenberg BN, Clokie CML et al (2003) Clinical success in harvesting autogenous bone using a minimally invasive trephine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasso RC, Lehuec JC, Shaffrey C et al (2005) Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schnee CL, Freese A, Weil RJ et al (1997) Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine 22:2222–2227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shamsaldin M, Mouchaty H, Desogus N et al (2006) Evaluation of donor site pain after anterior iliac crest harvesting for cervical fusion: a prospective study on 50 patients. Acta Neurochir 138:1071–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD et al (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 28:134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Skaggs DL, Samuelson MA, Hale JM et al (2000) Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children. Spine 25:2400–2402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM (1989) Donor site pain from the ilium. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71-A:677–680

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swan MC, Goodacre TEE (2006) Morbidity at the iliac crest donor site following bone grafting of the cleft alveolus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:129–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Westrich GH, Geller DS O’Malley MJ et al (2001) Anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting using the corticancellous reamer system. J Orthop Trauma 15:500–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilhan Alcelik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollock, R., Alcelik, I., Bhatia, C. et al. Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques. Eur Spine J 17, 845–852 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0648-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0648-3

Keywords

Navigation