[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-agent-based smart power management for remote health monitoring

  • Special issue on Neural Computing for IOT based Intelligent Healthcare Systems
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Internet of things (IoT) paradigm, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) contribute hugely by connecting all the devices for smart application purposes. The smart applications include smart healthcare system, as a key phenomenon of new era of medical service. Smart healthcare system consists of different techniques and approaches, and remote health monitoring is one of those important techniques of healthcare system, which helps doctors to monitor health of remotely located patients with different health statistics provided by sensors. This whole process should be fast, prompt in response and energy efficient which is tough with limited battery power of sensors. The article proposes a novel method for efficient utilization of power in WSNs, using artificial neural network-based technique self-organizing map (SOM) for clustering and distributed artificial intelligence (DAI) for power distribution in the nodes. The hybrid approach of SOM and multi-agent-based DAI results in better performance compared to other existing methods. The performance of the proposed method is validated with mathematical analysis and simulation results, which justifies the significance of the work for IoT environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Romer K, Mattern F (2004) The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE wireless communications 11(6):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz F, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Comm Mag 40(8):102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Culler D, Estrin D, Srivastava M (2004) Overview of sensor networks. IEEE Comput 37(8):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinzelman WB, Murphy AL, Carvalho HS, Perillo MA (2004) Middleware to support sensor network applications. IEEE Netw 18(1):6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang MJH, Tassiulas L (2004) Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 12(4):609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chase J (2013) The evolution of the internet of things. Texas Instrum 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bandyopadhyay D, Sen J (2011) Internet of things: applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wirel Pers Commun 58(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stankovic JA (2014) Research directions for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 1(1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta Pramanik PK, Upadhyaya BK, Pal S, Pal T (2018) Internet of things, smart sensors, and pervasive systems: enabling connected and pervasive healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815368-0.00001-4

  10. Kale S, Khandelwal CS (2013) Design and implementation of real time embedded tele-health monitoring system. In: International conference on circuits, power and computing technologies

  11. Gao T, Greenspan D, Welsh M, Juang RR, Alm A (2005) Vital signs monitoring and patient tracking over a wireless network. In: IEEE EMBS

  12. Shelby Z, Bormann C (2009) 6LoWPAN: the wireless embedded internet. Wiley, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Gia TN, Thanigaivelan NK, Rahmani A-M, Westerlund T, Liljeberg P, Tenhunen H (2014) Customizing 6LoWPAN networks towards Internet-of-Things based ubiquitous healthcare systems. NORCHIP, pp. 1–6, October 2014.

  14. Sherby Z, Hartke K, Bormann C (2014) The constrained application protocol (CoAP). In: IETF RFC, 7252.

  15. Khattak HA, Ruta M, Sciascio ED (2014) CoAP-based healthcare sensor networks: A survey. In: 11th International bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST), pp. 499–503, January 2014

  16. Ugrenovic D, Gardasevic G (2015) CoAP protocol for Web-based monitoring in IoT healthcare applications. In: 23rd Telecommunications forum telfor (TELFOR), pp. 79–82, November 2015.

  17. Shahbazi H, Araghizadeh MA, Dalvi M (2008) Minimum power intelligent routing in wireless sensors networks using self organizing neural networks. In: 2008 International symposium on telecommunications, Tehran, pp. 354-358

  18. Alkadhmawee AA, Songfeng Lu, AlShawi IS (2016) An energy-efficient heuristic based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Int J Innov Res Inf Secur (IJIRIS) 3(3):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahirwar GK, Goyal S, Mishra N, Agrawal R (2016) A survey: bat algorithm and its application to provide optimal solutions for optimization Problems. In J Comput Trends Technol (IJCTT) 38(3):129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oldewurtel F, Mahonen P (2006) Neural wireless sensor networks. In: 2006 International conference on systems and networks communications (ICSNC'06), Tahit, pp. 28–28.

  21. Aslam N, Phillips W, Robertson W, Sivakumar S (2011) A multi-criterion optimization technique for energy efficient cluster formation in wireless sensor networks. Inf Fusion 12(3):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosseingholizadeh A, Abhari A (2009) A new Agent-Based Solution for Wireless Sensor networks Management. In: 12th Communications and networking simulation symposium (CNS), San Diego, CA, USA, 22–27 March 2009.

  23. Behera TM et al (2019) Residual energy-based cluster-head selection in WSNs for IoT application. IEEE Internet Things J 6(3):5132–5139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 1(4):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sholla S et al (2017) Clustering internet of things: a review. J Sci Technol 3(2):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ali A, Ming Y, Si T, Iram S, Chakraborty S (2018) Enhancement of RWSN lifetime via firework clustering algorithm validated by ANN. Information 9(3):60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang SH, Nguyen T (2012) Distance based thresholds for cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Lett 16(9):1396–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee J, Kao T (2016) An improved three-layer low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 3(6):951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Chen L, Chen C, Guan X (2016) Joint clustering and routing design for reliable and efficient data collection in large-scale wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 3(4):520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vesanto J, Alhoniemi E (2003) Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(3):586–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbancho J, Leon C, Molina FJ, Barbancho A (2007) Using artificial in telligence in routing schemes for wireless networks. Comput Commun 30(14–15):2802–2811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cordina M, Debono CJ (2008) Increasing wireless sensor network lifetime through the application of SOM neural networks. In: 2008 3rd International symposium on communications, control and signal processing, St Julians, pp. 467-471

  33. Kumar DI, Kounte MR (2016) Comparative study of self-organizing map and deep self-organizing map using MATLAB. In: 2016 international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur, pp. 1020–1023

  34. Mittal M, Kumar K (2016) Data clustering in wireless sensor network implemented on self organization feature map (SOFM) neural network. In: 2016 International conference on computing, communication and automation (ICCCA), Noida, 2016, pp. 202–207

  35. Lasri R (2016) Clustering and classification using a self-organizing MAP: the main flaw and the improvement perspectives. In: 2016 SAI computing conference (SAI), London, pp. 1315-1318

  36. Hosseingholizadeh A, Abhari A (2007) A neural network approach for Wireless sensor network power management. In: Proceedings of 2nd International workshop on dependable network computing and mobile systems, pp. 1–7

  37. Kalnoor G, Agarkhed J (2017) Artificial intelligence-based technique for intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks. Artificial intelligence and evolutionary computations in engineering systems. Springer, Singapore, pp 50–75

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mukherjee A, Goswami P, Yan Z, Yang L, Rodrigues JJPC (2019) ADAI and adaptive pso-based resource allocation for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 7:131163–131171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar H, Singh PK (2018) Comparison and analysis on artificial intelligence based data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor networks. Procedia Comput Sci 132:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mukherjee A et al (2016) HML based smart positioning of fusion center for cooperative communication in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Commun Lett 20(11):2261–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Enami N, Moghadam RA, Dadashtabar K (2010) Neural network based energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Int J Comput Sci Eng Survey (IJCSES) 1(1):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goswami P et al (2019) An energy efficient clustering using firefly and HML for optical wireless sensor network. Optik 182:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Matlou OG, Abou-Mahfouz AM (2017) Utilising artificial intelligence in software defined wireless sensor network. Annu Conf IEEE Indu Electron Soc. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2017.8217065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mukherjee A et al (2019) Distributed artificial intelligence based cluster head power allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Sens Lett. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2019.2933908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Demetrio O, Restrepo D, Montoya A (2010) Artificial intelligence for wireless sensor networks enhancement. In: Tan YK (ed) Smart sensor networks. InTech, London, pp 73–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was suppored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62071003, 41874174), the Fund of Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Scattering (61424090107),  the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085MF186).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amrit Mukherjee or Lixia Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We, the authors, state that our article has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere. Also, we state there is no conflict of interest for the work and submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goswami, P., Mukherjee, A., Sarkar, B. et al. Multi-agent-based smart power management for remote health monitoring. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 22771–22780 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06040-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06040-4

Keywords

Navigation