Abstract
This study aims to revise the existing distance and similarity measures of the dual hesitant fuzzy set (DHFS) context in order to remove their shortcomings. The study first reveals the limitations of the existing distance measures of DHFSs through some counterexamples. Keeping in mind the indicated limitations of the existing ones, we revise them and show how the revised measures are important by applying them to the pattern recognition problem. Further, the statistical variance (SV) method is extended to the DHFS context for criteria weight determination. After that, an approach is made based on revised distance measures for ranking alternatives in multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM). In the end, a real-world example regarding the evaluation of the quality of movies is presented to elaborate on the practicality and superiority of the developed approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Ali Z, Mahmood T, Ullah K (2021) Picture hesitant fuzzy clustering based on generalized picture hesitant fuzzy distance measures. Knowledge 1(1):40–51
Ali J, Bashir Z, Rashid T (2022) On distance measure and TOPSIS model for probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets: application to healthcare facilities in public hospitals. Grey Syst: Theory Appl 12(1):197–229
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96
Bashir Z, Bashir Y, Rashid T, Ali J, Gao W (2019) A novel multi-attribute group decision-making approach in the framework of proportional dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Appl Sci 9(6):1232
Bashir Z, Ali J, Rashid T (2021) Consensus-based robust decision making methods under a novel study of probabilistic uncertain linguistic information and their application in Forex investment. Artif Intell Rev 54(3):2091–2132
Boyacı AÇ (2020) Selection of eco-friendly cities in turkey via a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision making approach. Appl Soft Comput 89:106090
Büyüközkan G, Görener A (2015) Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model. Kybernetes 44(2):220–237
Charilas DE, Panagopoulos AD, Markaki OI (2012) A unified network selection framework using principal component analysis and multi attribute decision making. Wireless Pers Commun 74(1):147–165
Chen Y, Peng X, Guan G, Jiang H (2014) Approaches to multiple attribute decision making based on the correlation coefficient with dual hesitant fuzzy information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2547–2556
Chen H, Xu G, Yang P (2019) Multi-attribute decision-making approach based on dual hesitant fuzzy information measures and their applications. Mathematics 7(9):786
Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Martinez L (2018) Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 115:152–171
Farhadinia B (2014) Correlation for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and dual interval valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(2):184–205
Farhadinia B, Xu Z (2016) Distance and aggregation-based methodologies for hesitant fuzzy decision making. Cogn Comput 9(1):81–94
Gao H, Wei G, Huang Y (2017) Dual hesitant bipolar fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:11508–11522
Garg H, Kumar K (2018) A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif Intell Rev 53(1):595–624
Hussain Tehreem A, Alsanad A (2021) Novel dombi aggregation operators in spherical cubic fuzzy information with applications in multiple attribute decision-making. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9921553
Kao C (2009) Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis. Appl Math Model 34(7):1779–1787
Kumar S (2020) Numerical solution of fuzzy fractional diffusion equation by Chebyshev spectral method. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22650
Kumar S, Zeidan D (2021) An efficient Mittag-Leffler kernel approach for time-fractional advection-reaction-diffusion equation. Appl Numer Math 170:190–207
Kumar S, Nieto JJ, Ahmad B (2022) Chebyshev spectral method for solving fuzzy fractional Fredholm-Volterra integro-differential equation. Math Comput Simul 192:501–513
Liang D, Liu D (2014) A novel risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(2):237–247
Liang D, Xu Z, Liu D (2017) Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Inf Sci 396:127–143
Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X-J (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142
Liu Y, Jiang W (2019) A new distance measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision making. Soft Comput 24:6987–7003
Liu S, Chan FT, Ran W (2016) Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst Appl 55:37–47
Liu JB, Malik MA, Ayub N, Siddiqui HMA (2020) Distance measures for multiple-attributes decision-making based on connection numbers of set pair nnalysis with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. IEEE Access 8:9172–9184
Malik MG, Bashir Z, Rashid T, Ali J (2018) Probabilistic hesitant intuitionistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry 10(9):392
Ni Y, Zhao H, Xu Z, Wang Z (2021) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09366-9
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455
Papathanasiou J (2021) An example on the use and limitations of MCDA: the case of fuzzy VIKOR. Ex Counterex 1:100001
Qu G, Li Y, Qu W, Li C (2017) Some new shapley dual hesitant fuzzy Choquet aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making-based TOPSIS. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(4):2463–2483
Rao R, Patel B (2010) A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Mater Des 31(10):4738–4747
Rao RV, Patel BK, Parnichkun M (2011) Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences. Robot Auton Syst 59(6):367–375
Ren Z, Wei C (2017) A multi-attribute decision-making method with prioritization relationship and dual hesitant fuzzy decision information. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(3):755–763
Ren Z, Xu Z, Wang H (2017) Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Inf Sci 388:388–389
Singh P (2014) A new method for solving dual hesitant fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions based on similarity measure. Appl Soft Comput 24:559–571
Singh P (2015) Distance and similarity measures for multiple-attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Math 36(1):111–126
Singh S, Olugu EU, Musa SN, Mahat AB, Wong KY (2015) Strategy selection for sustainable manufacturing with integrated AHP-VIKOR method under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1–4):547–563
Su Z, Xu Z, Liu H, Liu S (2015) Distance and similarity measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):731–745
Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1378–1382, IEEE
Wang R, Li W, Zhang T, Han Q (2020) New distance measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Symmetry 12(2):191
Wang L, Wang Q, Xu S, Ni M (2014) Distance and similarity measures of dual hesitant fuzzy sets with their applications to multiple attribute decision making. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on progress in informatics and computing, pp 88–92, IEEE
Wang L, Zheng X, Zhang L, Yue Q (2016) Notes on distance and similarity measures of dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Appl Math 46(4)
Wei Y, Wang Q (2021) New distances for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in clustering algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 41(6):6221–6232
Wei G, Zhang N (2014) A multiple criteria hestant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(2):1065–1075
Xia M, Xu Z (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407
Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181(11):2128–2138
Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-Based Syst 52:53–64
Yager RR (1986) On the theory of bags. Int J Gen Syst 13(1):23–37
Yang S, Ju Y (2015) A GRA method for investment alternative selection under dual hesitant fuzzy environment with incomplete weight information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(4):1533–1543
Ye J (2014) Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Appl Math Model 38(2):659–666
Yildiz D, Temur GT, Beskese A, Bozbura FT (2020) Evaluation of positive employee experience using hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(1):1043–1058
Yu D (2015) Archimedean aggregation operators based on dual hesitant fuzzy set and their application to GDM. Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 23(05):761–780
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Zadeh LA (1974) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Learning systems and intelligent robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–10
Zhang H (2020) Distance and entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Math 39(2):1–16
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang J (2014) Objective attributes weights determining based on shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–7
Zhang Y, Wang L, Yu X, Yao C (2018) A new concept of cosine similarity measures based on dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its possible applications. Clust Comput 22(6):15483–15492
Zhao N, Xu Z (2015) Entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy information. In: 2015 Fifth international conference on communication systems and network technologies, pp 1152–1156, IEEE
Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math 2012:1–13
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, J., Bashir, Z. & Rashid, T. A multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on revised distance measures under dual hesitant fuzzy setting with unknown weight information. Soft Comput 26, 8387–8401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07208-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07208-3