[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on revised distance measures under dual hesitant fuzzy setting with unknown weight information

  • Fuzzy systems and their mathematics
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to revise the existing distance and similarity measures of the dual hesitant fuzzy set (DHFS) context in order to remove their shortcomings. The study first reveals the limitations of the existing distance measures of DHFSs through some counterexamples. Keeping in mind the indicated limitations of the existing ones, we revise them and show how the revised measures are important by applying them to the pattern recognition problem. Further, the statistical variance (SV) method is extended to the DHFS context for criteria weight determination. After that, an approach is made based on revised distance measures for ranking alternatives in multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM). In the end, a real-world example regarding the evaluation of the quality of movies is presented to elaborate on the practicality and superiority of the developed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Ali Z, Mahmood T, Ullah K (2021) Picture hesitant fuzzy clustering based on generalized picture hesitant fuzzy distance measures. Knowledge 1(1):40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali J, Bashir Z, Rashid T (2022) On distance measure and TOPSIS model for probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets: application to healthcare facilities in public hospitals. Grey Syst: Theory Appl 12(1):197–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir Z, Bashir Y, Rashid T, Ali J, Gao W (2019) A novel multi-attribute group decision-making approach in the framework of proportional dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Appl Sci 9(6):1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir Z, Ali J, Rashid T (2021) Consensus-based robust decision making methods under a novel study of probabilistic uncertain linguistic information and their application in Forex investment. Artif Intell Rev 54(3):2091–2132

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacı AÇ (2020) Selection of eco-friendly cities in turkey via a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision making approach. Appl Soft Comput 89:106090

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Görener A (2015) Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model. Kybernetes 44(2):220–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Charilas DE, Panagopoulos AD, Markaki OI (2012) A unified network selection framework using principal component analysis and multi attribute decision making. Wireless Pers Commun 74(1):147–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Peng X, Guan G, Jiang H (2014) Approaches to multiple attribute decision making based on the correlation coefficient with dual hesitant fuzzy information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2547–2556

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Xu G, Yang P (2019) Multi-attribute decision-making approach based on dual hesitant fuzzy information measures and their applications. Mathematics 7(9):786

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Martinez L (2018) Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 115:152–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2014) Correlation for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and dual interval valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(2):184–205

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B, Xu Z (2016) Distance and aggregation-based methodologies for hesitant fuzzy decision making. Cogn Comput 9(1):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Wei G, Huang Y (2017) Dual hesitant bipolar fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:11508–11522

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Kumar K (2018) A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif Intell Rev 53(1):595–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain Tehreem A, Alsanad A (2021) Novel dombi aggregation operators in spherical cubic fuzzy information with applications in multiple attribute decision-making. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9921553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2009) Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis. Appl Math Model 34(7):1779–1787

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2020) Numerical solution of fuzzy fractional diffusion equation by Chebyshev spectral method. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Zeidan D (2021) An efficient Mittag-Leffler kernel approach for time-fractional advection-reaction-diffusion equation. Appl Numer Math 170:190–207

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Nieto JJ, Ahmad B (2022) Chebyshev spectral method for solving fuzzy fractional Fredholm-Volterra integro-differential equation. Math Comput Simul 192:501–513

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang D, Liu D (2014) A novel risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(2):237–247

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liang D, Xu Z, Liu D (2017) Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Inf Sci 396:127–143

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X-J (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Jiang W (2019) A new distance measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision making. Soft Comput 24:6987–7003

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Chan FT, Ran W (2016) Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst Appl 55:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JB, Malik MA, Ayub N, Siddiqui HMA (2020) Distance measures for multiple-attributes decision-making based on connection numbers of set pair nnalysis with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. IEEE Access 8:9172–9184

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MG, Bashir Z, Rashid T, Ali J (2018) Probabilistic hesitant intuitionistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry 10(9):392

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ni Y, Zhao H, Xu Z, Wang Z (2021) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09366-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Papathanasiou J (2021) An example on the use and limitations of MCDA: the case of fuzzy VIKOR. Ex Counterex 1:100001

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu G, Li Y, Qu W, Li C (2017) Some new shapley dual hesitant fuzzy Choquet aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making-based TOPSIS. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(4):2463–2483

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao R, Patel B (2010) A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Mater Des 31(10):4738–4747

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao RV, Patel BK, Parnichkun M (2011) Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences. Robot Auton Syst 59(6):367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Z, Wei C (2017) A multi-attribute decision-making method with prioritization relationship and dual hesitant fuzzy decision information. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(3):755–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Z, Xu Z, Wang H (2017) Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Inf Sci 388:388–389

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P (2014) A new method for solving dual hesitant fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions based on similarity measure. Appl Soft Comput 24:559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P (2015) Distance and similarity measures for multiple-attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Math 36(1):111–126

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Olugu EU, Musa SN, Mahat AB, Wong KY (2015) Strategy selection for sustainable manufacturing with integrated AHP-VIKOR method under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1–4):547–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Z, Xu Z, Liu H, Liu S (2015) Distance and similarity measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):731–745

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1378–1382, IEEE

  • Wang R, Li W, Zhang T, Han Q (2020) New distance measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Symmetry 12(2):191

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Wang Q, Xu S, Ni M (2014) Distance and similarity measures of dual hesitant fuzzy sets with their applications to multiple attribute decision making. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on progress in informatics and computing, pp 88–92, IEEE

  • Wang L, Zheng X, Zhang L, Yue Q (2016) Notes on distance and similarity measures of dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Appl Math 46(4)

  • Wei Y, Wang Q (2021) New distances for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in clustering algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 41(6):6221–6232

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Zhang N (2014) A multiple criteria hestant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(2):1065–1075

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xia M, Xu Z (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181(11):2128–2138

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-Based Syst 52:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1986) On the theory of bags. Int J Gen Syst 13(1):23–37

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Ju Y (2015) A GRA method for investment alternative selection under dual hesitant fuzzy environment with incomplete weight information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(4):1533–1543

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2014) Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Appl Math Model 38(2):659–666

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz D, Temur GT, Beskese A, Bozbura FT (2020) Evaluation of positive employee experience using hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(1):1043–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu D (2015) Archimedean aggregation operators based on dual hesitant fuzzy set and their application to GDM. Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 23(05):761–780

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1974) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Learning systems and intelligent robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2020) Distance and entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Math 39(2):1–16

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang J (2014) Objective attributes weights determining based on shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang L, Yu X, Yao C (2018) A new concept of cosine similarity measures based on dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its possible applications. Clust Comput 22(6):15483–15492

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao N, Xu Z (2015) Entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy information. In: 2015 Fifth international conference on communication systems and network technologies, pp 1152–1156, IEEE

  • Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math 2012:1–13

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tabasam Rashid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, J., Bashir, Z. & Rashid, T. A multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on revised distance measures under dual hesitant fuzzy setting with unknown weight information. Soft Comput 26, 8387–8401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07208-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07208-3

Keywords

Navigation