A tri-objective preference-based uniform weight design method using Delaunay triangulation

• Adra SF, Griffin I, Fleming PJ (2007) A comparative study of progressive preference articulation techniques for multiobjective optimisation. International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 908–921

• Antonio M, Jeremy O, Ludovic H, Paolo RG, Franck M (2018) An application-based characterization of dynamical distance geometry problems. Optimization Letters pp 1–15

• Bern M, Eppstein D (1970) Mesh generation and optimal triangulation, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., pp 23–90

• Cheng R, Jin Y, Olhofer M, Sendhoff B (2016) A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(5):773–791

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Das I, Dennis JE (1996) Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. Siam J Optim 8(3):631–657

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, with a foreword by David E. Goldberg

• Deb K, Jain H (2014) An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part i: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans Evol Computat 18(4):577–601

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deb K, Kumar A (2007) Light beam search based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 2125–2132, 10.1109/CEC.2007.4424735

• Fang KT (1980) Uniform design-the application of number theoretic method in experiment design. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica pp 363–371

• Field DA (1988) Laplacian smoothing and delaunay triangulations. Commun Appl Num Methods 4(6):709–712

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fortune S (1997) Voronoi diagrams and delaunay triangulations. Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry pp 377–388

• Ho ESL, Komura T, Tai CL (2010) Spatial relationship preserving character motion adaptation p 1

• Huband S, Hingston P, Barone L, While L (2006) A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(5):477–506

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jaszkiewicz A, Slowinski R (1999) The ‘light beam search’ approach - an overview of methodology and applications. Eur J Op Res 113(2):300–314

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaisa M (1998) Nolinear multiobjective optimization. International Series in Operation Research & Management Science, Springer, US

  Google Scholar 

• Li K, Zhang Q, Kwong S, Li M, Wang R (2014) Stable matching-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18(6):909–923

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li K, Deb K, Yao X (2018) R-metric: evaluating the performance of preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization using reference points. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 22(6):821–835

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ma X, Qi Y, Li L, Liu F, Jiao L, Wu J (2014) Moea/d with uniform decomposition measurement for many-objective problems. Soft Comput A Fusion Found Methodol Appl 18(12):2541–2564

  Google Scholar 

• Ma X, Liu F, Qi Y, Li L, Jiao L, Deng X, Wang X, Dong B, Hou Z, Zhang Y (2016) Moea/d with biased weight adjustment inspired by user preference and its application on multi-objective reservoir flood control problem. Soft Comput A Fusion Found Methodol Appl 20(12):4999–5023

  Google Scholar 

• Mohammadi A, Omidvar MN, Li X (2012) Reference point based multi-objective optimization through decomposition. In: 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1–8

• Mohammadi A, Omidvar MN, Li X, Deb K (2014) Integrating user preferences and decomposition methods for many-objective optimization. In: 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp 421–428

• Qi Y, Ma X, Yin M, Liu F, Wei J (2014) Moea/d with a delaunay triangulation based weight adjustment. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, ACM, New York, NY, USA, GECCO Comp ’14, pp 93–94, 10.1145/2598394.2598416

• Qi Y, Yin M, Li X (2016) A delaunay triangulation based density measurement for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Australasian conference on artificial life & computational intelligence, Springer International Publishing, pp 183–192

• Qi Y, Li X, Yu J, Miao Q (2019) User-preference based decomposition in moea/d without using an ideal point. Swarm Evol Comput 44:597–611

• Tan YY, Jiao Yc, Li H, Wang Xk (2013) Moea/d + uniform design: a new version of moea/d for optimization problems with many objectives. Comput Op Res 40(6):1648–1660

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Wang R, Zhang Q, Zhang T (2016) Decomposition-based algorithms using pareto adaptive scalarizing methods. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(6):821–837

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wierzbicki AP (1980) The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biomet Bull 1(6):80–83

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zapotecas-Martínez S, Coello Coello CA, Aguirre HE, Tanaka K (2019) A review of features and limitations of existing scalable multiobjective test suites. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 23(1):130–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2836912

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang Q, Li H (2007) Moea/d: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithm – a comparative case study. Int Conf Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN-V), 1998 1498(3):292–301

Download references