[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Novel migration operators of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biogeography-based optimization (BBO) is a nature-inspired optimization algorithm and has been developed in both theory and practice. In canonical BBO, migration operator is crucial to affect algorithm’s performance. In migration operator, a good solution has a large probability to be selected as an immigrant, while a poor solution has a large probability to be selected as an emigrant. The features in an emigrant will be completely replaced by the features in the corresponding immigrant. Hence, the migration operator in canonical BBO causes a significant deterioration of population diversity, and therefore, the algorithm’s performance worsens. In this paper, we propose three novel migration operators to enhance the exploration ability of BBO. To present a mathematical proof, Markov analysis is conducted to confirm the advantages of the proposed migration operators over existing ones. In addition, a number of benchmark tests are carried out to empirically assess the performance of the proposed migration operators, on both low-dimensional and high-dimensional numerical optimization problems. The comparison results demonstrate that the proposed migration operators are feasible and effective to enhance BBO’s performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ahn C (2006) Advances in evolutionary algorithms: theory, design and practice. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bagdonavius V, Kruopis J, Nikulin M (2011) Nonparametric tests for complete data. Wiley-ISTE, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brest J, Zamuda A, Fister I, Maučec MS (2010) Large scale global optimization using self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, pp 1–8

  • Castillo O, Melin P (2012) Optimization of type-2 fuzzy systems based on bio-inspired methods: a concise review. Inf Sci 205:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Siarry P, Nakib A, Blanc R (2012) An improved biogeography based optimization approach for segmentation of human head CT-scan images employing fuzzy entropy. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1698–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Shi P (2011) Using investment satisfaction capability index based particle swarm optimization to construct a stock portfolio. Inf Sci 181(14):2989–2999

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BJ, Shu HZ, Coatrieux G, Chen G, Xun XM, Coatrieux JL (2015) Color image analysis by quaternion-type moments. J Math Imaging Vis 51:124–144

  • Cheng R, Jin Y (2015) A social learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for scalable optimization. Inf Sci 291:43–60

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng R, Jin Y (2015) A competitive swarm optimizer for large scale optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(2):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clerc M (1999) The swarm and the queen: toward a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization, vol 3. In: Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation, Washington, DC, pp 1951–1957

  • Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm: explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelman LJ, Schaffer JD (1993) Real-coded genetic algorithms and interval schemata. Found Genet Algorithms II:187–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Q, Liu S, Wu Q, Tang GQ, Zhang H, Chen H (2013) Modified biogeography-based optimization with local search mechanism. J Appl Math. doi:10.1155/2013/960524

  • Fu ZJ, Sun XM, Liu Q, Zhou L, Shu JG (2015) Achieving efficient cloud search services: multi-keyword ranked search over encrypted cloud date supporting parallel computing. IEICE Trans Commun E98B(1):190–200

  • Gu B, Sheng VS, Wang Z, Ho D, Osman S, Li S (2015) Incremental learning for nu-support vector regression. Neual Netw 67:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Sheng VS, Tay KY, Romano W, Li S (2015) Incremental support vector learning for ordinal regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(7):1403–1416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Wang L, Wu Q (2014) An analysis of the migration rates of biogeography-based optimization. Inf Sci 254(1):111–140

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Wang L, Ge SS, Ren H, Mao Y (2015) Drift analysis of mutation operations for biogeography-based optimization. Soft Comput 19(7):1881–1892

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Wang L, Qidi W (2016) Numerical comparisons of migration models for multi-objective biogeography-based optimization. Inf Sci 328:302–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Ge SS (2015) Vibration control of a flexible beam with output constraint. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(8):5023–5030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Ge SS (2016) Cooperative control of a nonuniform gantry crane with constrained tension. Automatica 66(4):146–154

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Zhang S, Ge SS (2014) Adaptive control of a flexible crane system with the boundary output constraint. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(8):4126–4133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Chen Y, Yin Z (2016) Adaptive neural network control of an uncertain robot with full-state constraints. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(3):620–629

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanala P, Srivastava S, Srivastava A, Schulz N (2012) Optimal control of voltage and power in a multi-zonal mvdc shipboard power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(2):642–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2001) Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatib W, Fleming PL (1998) The stud GA: A mini revolution? In: Eiben AE, Bäck T, Schoenauer M, Schwefel H-P (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature–PPSN V: proceedings of the 5th international conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 27–30, 1998, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 683–691. doi:10.1007/BFb0056910

  • Korosec P, Tashkova K, Silc J (2010) The differential ant-stigmergy algorithm for large-scale global optimization. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, pp 1–8

  • Larranaga P, Karshenas H, Bielza C, Santana R (2013) A review on evolutionary algorithms in bayesian network learning and inference tasks. Inf Sci 233:109–125

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Latorre A, Muelas S, Pena J-M (2013) Large scale global optimization: experimental results with mos-based hybrid algorithms, pp 2742–2749, Cancun, Mexico

  • Li X, Wang J, Zhou J, Yin M (2011) A perturb biogeography based optimization with mutation for global numerical optimization. Appl Math Comput 218(2):598–609

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Tang K, Omidvar M, Yang Z, Qin K (2013) Benchmark functions for the cec’2013 special session and competition on large scale global optimization. In: Technical report, Evolutionary Computation and Machine Learning Group, RMIT University, Australia, 2013

  • Li J, Li XL, Sun XM (2015) Segmentation-based image copy-move forgery detection scheme. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10(3):507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Tang K (2013) Scaling up covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy using cooperative coevolution. In: LNCS, vol 8206, pp 350–357, Hefei, China

  • Li X, Yao X (2012) Cooperatively coevolving particle swarms for large scale optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 16(2):210–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lohokare MR, Pattnaik SS, Panigrahi BK, Das S (2013) Accelerated biogeography-based optimization with neighborhood search for optimization. Appl Sofy Comput 13(5):2318–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H (2010) An analysis of the equilibrium of migration models for biogeography-based optimization. Inf Sci 180(18):3444–3464

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Simon D, Fei M, Xie Z (2013) Variations of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis. Inf Sci 220:492–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Simon D (2011) Analysis of migration models of biogeography-based optimization using markov theory. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(6):1052–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Simon D (2011) Blended biogeography-based optimization for constrained optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(3):517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma TH, Zhou JJ, Tang ML, Tian Y, AL-Dhelaan A, AL-Rodhaan M, Lee S (2015) Social network and tag sources based augmenting collaborative recommender system. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E98D(4):902–910

  • Michalewicz Z (1992) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molina D, Lozano M., Herrera F (2010) MA-SW-chains: memetic algorithm based on local search chains for large scale continuous global optimization. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, pp 1–8

  • Mühlenbein H, Schlierkamp-Voosen D (1993) Predictive models for the breeder genetic algorithm i. continuous parameter optimization. Evolut Comput 1(1):25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omidvar MN, Li Xiaodong, Yao Xin (2010) Cooperative co-evolution with delta grouping for large scale non-separable function optimization. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, p 1–8

  • Parmee I (2001) Evolutionary and adaptive computing in engineering design. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puris A, Bello R, Molina D, Herrera F (2012) Variable mesh optimization for continuous optimization problems. Soft Comput 16(3):511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savsani V, Rao R, Vakharia D (2009) Discrete optimisation of a gear train using biogeography based optimisation technique. Int J Des Eng 2(2):205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Tan HW, Wang J, Wang JW, Lee S (2015) A novel routing protocol providing good transmission reliability in underwater sensor networks. J Internet Technol 16(1):171–178

  • Shin Y-B, Kita E (2014) Search performance improvement of particle swarm optimization by second best particle information. Appl Math Comput 246:346–354

  • Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(6):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D, Ergezer M, Dawei D, Rarick R (2011) Markov models for biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 41(1):299–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D, Rarick R, Ergezer M, Du D (2011) Analytical and numerical comparisons of biogeography-based optimization and genetic algorithms. Inf Sci 181(7):1224–1248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D (2013) Evolutionary optimization algorithms: biologically-inspired and population-based approaches to computer intelligence. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, Li X, Suganthan PN, Yang Z, Weise T (2009) Benchmark functions for the CEC2010 special session and competition on large-scale global optimization. In: Technical report, Nature Inspired Computation and Applications Laboratory

  • Wang Yu, Li Bin (2010) Two-stage based ensemble optimization for large-scale global optimization. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, pp 1–8

  • Wang H, Wu Z, Rahnamayan S, Jiang D (2010) Sequential de enhanced by neighborhood search for large scale global optimization. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), 2010, pp 1–7

  • Weber M, Neri F, Tirronen V (2011) Shuffle or update parallel differential evolution for large-scale optimization. Soft Comput 15(11, SI):2089–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei F, Wang Y, Huo Y (2013) Smoothing and auxiliary functions based cooperative coevolution for global optimization, pp 2736–2741, Cancun, Mexico

  • Wu G, Qiu D, Yu Y, Pedrycz W, Ma M, Li H (2014) Superior solution guided particle swarm optimization combined with local search techniques. Expert Syst Appl 41(16):7536–7548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia ZH, Wang XH, Sun XM, Wang Q (2016) A secure and dynamic multi-keyword ranked search scheme over encrypted cloud data. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 27(2):340–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie SD, Wang YX (2014) Construction of tree network with limited delivery latency in homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 78:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong G, Li Y, Chen J, Shi D, Duan X (2014) Polyphyletic migration operator and orthogonal learning aided biogeography-based optimization for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. Energy Convers Manag 80:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Liu Y, Lin G (1999) Evolutionary programming made faster. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 3(2):82–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Zhang X (2014) Enhanced comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization. Appl Math Comput 242:265–276

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Wei P, Yu HY (2012) Biogeography-based optimisation search algorithm for block matching motion estimation. IET Image Process 6(7):1014–1023

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H-G, Liu Y-A, Tang B-H, Liu K-M (2014) An exploratory research of elitist probability schema and its applications in evolutionary algorithms. Appl Intell 40(4):695–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Liu H, Ding Y (2014) Dynamic bee colony algorithm based on multi-species co-evolution. Appl Intell 40(3):427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Jeon B, Xu DH, Wu J QM, Zhang H (2015) Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy C-means algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28:961–973

Download references

Acknowledgments

We much appreciate the help from the editors and the reviewers. They give us many useful comments to improve the quality of this paper. This work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61503287, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Young Talents Program in Tongji University), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China, Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20100072110038), Shanghai University Young Teachers’ Training Program (ZZslg15087), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sino-German College of Applied Sciences, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China

    Weian Guo

  2. Department of Electronics and Information, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China

    Lei Wang & Hongjun Tian

  3. Shanghai-Humburg College, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

    Chenyong Si

  4. College of Electronics and Information, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212003, Jiangsu, China

    Yongwei Zhang

  5. Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Electric Power and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Junjie Hu

Authors
  1. Weian Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chenyong Si
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongjun Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junjie Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, W., Wang, L., Si, C. et al. Novel migration operators of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis. Soft Comput 21, 6605–6632 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2209-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2209-8

Keywords