[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization of capital accumulation games

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the potential differential game concept introduced by Fonseca-Morales and Hernández-Lerma (2018) is used in analyzing stabilization problems for n-player noncooperative capital accumulation games (CAGs). By first identifying a CAG as a potential game, an associated optimal control problem (OCP) of the CAG is obtained, whose optimal solution is an open-loop Nash equilibrium for the CAG. Compared with a saddle-point stability condition obtained for undiscounted CAG in the literature, a sufficient and easily verifiable condition is obtained for both discounted and undiscounted CAGs. In addition, the concept allows the turnpike property obtained for OCPs in Trélat and Zuazua (2015) to be verified for CAGs. Lastly, an illustrative example is given to verify the latter stability result for some CAGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bressan A (2009) From optimal control to non-cooperative differential games: a homotopy approach. Control Cybern 38(4A):1081–1106

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brock WA (1977) Differential games with active and passive variables. In: Mathematical economics and game theory, Lecture Notes in Econ. and Math. Systems, vol 141. Springer, pp 34–52

  3. Brock WA, Scheinkman JA (1976) Global asymptotic stability of optimal control systems with applications to the theory of economic growth. In: The Hamiltonian approach to dynamic economics. J Econom Theory 12(1):164–190

  4. Camilli F, Grüne L, Wirth F (2008) Control Lyapunov functions and Zubov’s method. SIAM J Control Optim 47(1):301–326

  5. Carlson D, Haurie A (1995) A turnpike theory for infinite horizon open-loop differential games with decoupled controls. In: New trends in dynamic games and applications, pp 353–376, Ann Intern Soc Dynam Games, 3, Birkhauser, Boston, MA

  6. Cass D, Shell K (1976) The structure and stability of competitive dynamical systems. Hamiltonian dynamics in economics. J Econom Theory 12(1):31–70

  7. Dmitruk AV, Kuz’kina N (2005) Existence theorem in the optimal control problem on an infinite time interval. Math Notes 78(3–4):466–480

  8. Dockner EJ, Feichtinger G, Jørgensen S (1985) Tractable classes of nonzero-sum open-loop Nash differential games: theory and examples. J Optim Theory Appl 45(2):179–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dockner EJ, Takahashi H (1990) On the saddle-point stability for a class of dynamic games. J Optim Theory Appl 67(2):247–258

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fershtman C, Muller E (1984) Capital accumulation games of infinite duration. J Econ Theory 33(2):322–339

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fershtman C, Muller E (1986) Turnpike properties of capital accumulation games. J Econ Theory 38(1):167–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Flaherty MT (1980) Dynamic limit pricing, barriers to entry, and rational firms. J Econ Theory 23(2):160–182

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fonseca-Morales A, Hernández-Lerma O (2018) Potential differential games. Dyn Games Appl 8(2):254–279

  14. Freeman R, Primbs J (1996) Control Lyapunov functions: new ideas from an old source. In: Proceedings of 35th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 4, pp 3926–3931. IEEE

  15. Gaitsgory V, Grüne L, Thatcher N (2015) Stabilization with discounted optimal control. Syst Control Lett 82:91–98

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Haurie A, Leitmann G (1984) On the global asymptotic stability of equilibrium solutions for open-loop differential-games. Large Scale Syst 6(2):107–122

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee EB, Markus L (1967) Foundations of optimal control theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Levhari D, Liviatan N (1972) On stability in the saddle-point sense. J Econ Theory 4(1):88–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Long NV (2010) A survey of dynamic games in economics. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Magill MJ (1977) Some new results on the local stability of the process of capital accumulation. J Econ Theory 15(1):174–210

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Magill MJ, Scheinkman JA (1979) Stability of regular equilibria and the correspondence principle for symmetric variational problems. Int Econ Rev 20:297–315

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirică Ş (2008) Reducing a differential game to a pair of optimal control problems. In: Differential equations, chaos and variational variational problems, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 75, Birkhauser, Basel. pp 269–283

  23. Reynolds S (1987) Capacity investment, preemption and commitment in an infinite horizon model. Int Econ Rev 28:69–88

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockafellar R (1973) Saddle points of Hamiltonian systems in convex problems of Lagrange. J Optim Theory Appl 12(4):367–390

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez A (1996) On the local stability of the stationary solution to variational problems. J Econ Dyn Control 20(1–3):415–431

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez A (2004) On the local stability of the solution to optimal control problems. J Econ Dyn Control 28(12):2475–2484

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Slade M (1994) What does an oligopoly maximize? J Ind Econ 42:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sorger G (1990) The saddle point property in Hamiltonian systems. J Math Anal Appl 148(1):191–201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Sorger G (1992) Local stability of stationary states in discounted optimal control systems. J Optim Theory Appl 72(1):143–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinberg AM, Stalford HL (1973) On existence of optimal controls. J Optim Theory Appl 11(3):266–273

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sethi SP (2019) Optimal control theory: applications to management science and economics, 3rd edn. Springer

  32. Trélat E, Zuazua E (2015) The turnpike property in finite-dimensional nonlinear optimal control. J Differ Equ 258(1):81–114

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang W, Lin X, Chen B (2016) Lasalle-type theorem and its applications to infinite horizon optimal control of discrete-time nonlinear stochastic systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62(1):250–261

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi through the “KMUTT 55th Anniversary Commemorative Fund.” The first author was supported by the Petchra Pra Jom Klao Doctoral Scholarship Academic for Ph.D. Program at KMUTT. This project is supported by the Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS) Center under Computational and Applied Science for Smart Innovation (CLASSIC), Faculty of Science, KMUTT.

Moreover, Poom Kumam was supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi under the TRF Research Scholar Grant No.RSA6080047.

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Center of Excellence in Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS-CoE), KMUTT.

The research of the third author was partially supported by the Fondo SEP-CINVESTAV grant FIDSC 2018/196, and Conacyt grant CF-2019 263963.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poom Kumam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Published in the topical collection Optimal Control and Dynamic Games: Large Time Behavior and Geometry.

Appendix

Appendix

Theorem A1

(Theorem 1, [13]) Let \(p : X \times U \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be a certain function in differential game (1)–(2). We assume that one of the following conditions holds for every \(i \in N:\)

  1. (a)

    There exists a function \(c^i : U_{-i}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) such that

    $$\begin{aligned} L^i(x,u) = p(x,u)+c^i(u_{-i}). \end{aligned}$$
  2. (b)

    There exist functions \(c^i : X \times U_{-i} \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\ {and} \ g_i : X\rightarrow X_i\) such that

    $$\begin{aligned} L^i(x,u) = p(x,u)+c^i(x,u_{-i}) \end{aligned}$$

    and \(f^i(x,u) = g^i(x).\)

  3. (c)

    There exist functions \(c^i : X_{-i} \times U_{-i}\rightarrow \mathbb {R} \ {and}\ g_i : X_i \times U_i\rightarrow X_i\) such that

    $$\begin{aligned} L^i(x,u) = p(x,u)+ {c^i(x_{-i},u_{-i})} \end{aligned}$$

    and \(f^i(x,u) = g^i(x_i,u_i).\)

Then differential game (1)–(2) is an open-loop potential game with potential function p.

Assumption A1

For each \(i\in N,\) the sets \(U_i\) and \(X_i\) are open and convex.

Assumption A2

The functions \(L^1,\ldots ,L^n\) satisfy that

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla _{x_k} L^1 =\cdots =\nabla _{x_k} L^n\ \ \forall k\in R, \end{aligned}$$

where \(R \subseteq N\) is a nonempty subset of indices k such that \(l_k > 0\).

Condition A1

(Sufficient conditions) The function \(P : [0,\infty ) \times X \times U \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is in \(C^2(X \times U)\), is concave in (xu), and for every \(i \in N\) satisfies

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla _{u_i} P =\nabla _{u_i} L^i,\ \ \nabla _{x_i} P =\nabla _{x_i} L^i \end{aligned}$$

Condition A2

(Sufficient conditions) Let P be a function as in Condition A1. We assume that for each Lagrange multiplier \(\lambda ^*\) as in Remark 4 in [13] the function

$$\begin{aligned} (x,u)\mapsto H (t,x,u,\lambda ^*(t)) \end{aligned}$$

is concave in (xu).

In (11)–(12), the function P is called p. Let P satisfies Conditions A1 and A2, then we have:

Assumption A3

The open-loop multistrategies \(u_\uptau \) of the \((OCP)_\uptau \) defined as in OCP (11)–(12) on the interval \([0,\uptau ],\ \uptau < \infty ,\) are in \(L^\infty ([0,\uptau ])\), the space of essentially bounded functions on \([0,\uptau ]\).

Assumption A4

For each finite \(\uptau >0,\ (OCP)_\uptau \) has at least one optimal solution \((x_\uptau ^*,u_\uptau ^*)\).

Assumption A5

The static optimization problem

$$\begin{aligned} \max _{(x,u)\in X\times U}P(x,u) \end{aligned}$$

subject to

$$\begin{aligned} f(x,u)=0. \end{aligned}$$

has at least one optimal solution \((\bar{x},\bar{u})\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rilwan, J., Kumam, P. & Hernández-Lerma, O. Stabilization of capital accumulation games. Math. Control Signals Syst. 34, 493–513 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-022-00314-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-022-00314-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation