[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

A second order cone complementarity approach for the numerical solution of elastoplasticity problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a new approach for solving elastoplastic problems as second order cone complementarity problems (SOCCPs). Specially, two classes of elastoplastic problems, i.e. the J 2 plasticity problems with combined linear kinematic and isotropic hardening laws and the Drucker-Prager plasticity problems with associative or non-associative flow rules, are taken as the examples to illustrate the main idea of our new approach. In the new approach, firstly, the classical elastoplastic constitutive equations are equivalently reformulated as second order cone complementarity conditions. Secondly, by employing the finite element method and treating the nodal displacements and the plasticity multiplier vectors of Gaussian integration points as the unknown variables, we obtain a standard SOCCP formulation for the elastoplasticity analysis, which enables the using of general SOCCP solvers developed in the field of mathematical programming be directly available in the field of computational plasticity. Finally, a semi-smooth Newton algorithm is suggested to solve the obtained SOCCPs. Numerical results of several classical plasticity benchmark problems confirm the effectiveness and robustness of the SOCCP approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Han W, Reddy BD (1999) Plasticity: mathematical theory and numerical analysis. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Luenberger DG (1973) Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Maier G (1970) A matrix structural theory of piece-wise linear plasticity with interacting yield planes. Meccanica 6: 55–66

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin JB, Reddy BD, Griffin TB (1987) Applications of mathematical programming concepts to incremental elastic-plastic analysis. Eng Struct 9: 171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feijoo RA, Zouain N (1988) Formulations in rates and increments for elastic-plastic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26: 2031–2048

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy BD, Martin JB (1991) Algorithms for the solution of internal variable problems in plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 93: 253–273

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Comi C, Corigliano A, Maier G (1991) Extremum properties of finite-step solutions in elastoplasticity with nonlinear mixed hardening. Int J Solids Struct 27(8): 965–981

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Romano G, Rosati L, Marottide Sciarra M (1993) Variational principles for a class of finite step elastoplastic problems with non-linear mixed hardening. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 109: 293–314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Simo JC, Taylor RL (1986) A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 22: 649–670

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuomo M, Contrafatto L (2000) Stress rate formulation for elastoplastic models with internal variables based on augmented Lagrangian regularization. Int J Solids Struct 37: 3935–3964

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang HW, He SY, Li XS, Wriggers P (2004) A new algorithm for numerical solution of 3D elastoplastic contact problems with orthotropic friction law. Comput Mech 34: 1–14

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Krabbenhøft K, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW, Wriggers P (2007) an interior point algorithm for elastoplasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69: 592–626

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu C (1995) A finite element-mathematical programming method for elastoplastic contact problems with friction. Finite Elem Anal Des 20: 273–282

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tin-Loi F, Pang JS (1993) Elastoplastic analysis of structures with nonlinear hardening: a nonlinear complementarity approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 107: 299–312

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen PW (2002) A non-smooth Newton method for elastoplastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191: 1189–1219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Christian Wieners (2008) SQP methods for incremental plasticity with kinematic hardening. In: IUTAM symposium on theoretical, computational and modeling aspects of inelastic media. IUTAM book series, vol 11, Part 4, pp 143–153. Springer, Berlin

  19. Hjiaj M, Fortin J, de Saxcé G (2003) A complete stress update algorithm for the non-associated Drucker-Prager model including treatment of the apex. Int J Eng Sci 41: 1109–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2001) Lectures on modern convex optimization: analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bisbos CD, Pardalos PM (2007) Second-order cone and semi-definite representations of material failure criteria. J Optim Theory Appl 134: 275–301

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Krabbenhøft K, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2007) Formulation and solution of some plasticity problems as conic programs. Int J Solids Struct 44: 1533–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krabbenhøft K, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2008) Three-dimensional Mohr–Coulomb limit analysis using semidefinite programming. Commun Numer Methods Eng 24: 1107–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Makrodimopoulos A (2006) Computational formulation of shakedown analysis as a conic quadratic optimization problem. Mech Res Commun 33: 72–83

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen JS, Pan SH (2012) A survey on SOC complementarity functions and solution methods for SOCPs and SOCCPs. Pacific J Optim 8:33–74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hayashi S (2004) Studies on second order cone complementarity problems. PhD thesis, Kyoto University

  27. de Souza Neto EA, Perić D, Owen DRJ (2008) Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Wanxie Z, Hongwu Z, Chengwei W (1997) Parametric variational principle and its application in engineering. Scientific and Technical Publishers, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reddy BD, Wieners C, Wohlmuth B (2012) Finite element analysis and algorithms for single-crystal strain-gradient plasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng. http://www.math.kit.edu/iwrmm/seite/preprints/media/preprint%20nr.%2011-4.pdf

  30. Pan SH, Chen JS (2010) A semi-smooth Newton method for SOCCPs based on a one-parametric class of complementarity functions. Comput Optim Appl 45: 59–88

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Fukushima M, Luo ZQ, Tseng P (2002) Smoothing functions for second-order cone complementarity problems. SIAM J Optim 12: 436–460

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Hayashi S, Yamashita N, Fukushima M (2005) A combined smoothing and regularization method for monotone second-order cone complementarity problems. SIAM J Optim 15: 593–615

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen JS, Tseng P (2005) An unconstrained smooth minimization reformulation of the second-order cone complementarity problem. Math Program 104: 293–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Hager C, Wohlmuth B (2009) Nonlinear complementarity functions for plasticity problems with frictional contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198: 3411–3427

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang HW, Li JY, Pan SH (2011) New second-order cone linear complementarity formulation and semi-smooth Newton algorithm for finite element analysis of 3D frictional contact problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200: 77–88

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. De Saxce G, Bousshine L (1998) Limit analysis theorems for implicit standard materials: application to the unilateral contact with dry friction and the non associated flow rules in soils and rocks. Int J Mech Sci 40: 387–398

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Y. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L.L., Li, J.Y., Zhang, H.W. et al. A second order cone complementarity approach for the numerical solution of elastoplasticity problems. Comput Mech 51, 1–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0698-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0698-6

Keywords