[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity Results for Generating Subgraphs

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A graph G is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on its vertices. Then G is w -well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-well-covered is a vector space, denoted WCW(G). Let B be a complete bipartite induced subgraph of G on vertex sets of bipartition \(B_{X}\) and \(B_{Y}\). Then B is generating if there exists an independent set S such that \(S \cup B_{X}\) and \(S \cup B_{Y}\) are both maximal independent sets of G. In the restricted case that a generating subgraph B is isomorphic to \(K_{1,1}\), the unique edge in B is called a relating edge. Deciding whether an input graph G is well-covered is co-NP-complete. Therefore finding WCW(G) is co-NP-hard. Deciding whether an edge is relating is NP-complete. Therefore, deciding whether a subgraph is generating is NP-complete as well. In this article we discuss the connections among these problems, provide proofs for NP-completeness for several restricted cases, and present polynomial characterizations for some other cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, J.I., Nowakowski, R.J.: Well covered vector spaces of graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 19, 952–965 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J.I., Nowakowski, R.J., Zverovich, I.E.: The structure of well-covered graphs with no cycles of length 4. Discrete Math. 307, 2235–2245 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Caro, Y., Ellingham, N., Ramey, G.F.: Local structure when all maximal independent sets have equal weight. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 11, 644–654 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Caro, Y., Sebő, A., Tarsi, M.: Recognizing greedy structures. J. Algorithms 20, 137–156 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chvatal, V., Slater, P.J.: A note on well-covered graphs. In: Quo Vadis, Graph Theory? Annals of Discrete Mathematics 55, pp. 179–182. North Holland, Amsterdam (1993)

  6. Finbow, A., Hartnell, B., Nowakowski, R.: A characterization of well-covered graphs of girth 5 or greater. J. Comb. Theory B 57, 44–68 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Finbow, A., Hartnell, B., Nowakowski, R.: A characterization of well-covered graphs that contain neither 4- nor 5-cycles. J. Graph Theory 18, 713–721 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gold, E.M.: Complexity of automaton identification from given data. Inf. Control 37, 302–320 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Levit, V.E., Tankus, D.: Weighted well-covered graphs without \(C_{4}\), \(C_{5}\), \(C_{6}\), \(C_{7}\). Discrete Appl. Math. 159, 354–359 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Levit, V.E., Tankus, D.: On relating edges in graphs without cycles of length 4. J. Discrete Algorithms 26, 28–33 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Levit, V.E., Tankus, D.: Weighted well-covered claw-free graphs. Discrete Math. 338, 99–106 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Levit, V.E., Tankus, D.: Well-covered graphs without cycles of lengths 4, 5 and 6. Discrete Appl. Math. 186, 158–167 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Plummer, M.D.: Some covering concepts in graphs. J. Comb. Theory 8, 91–98 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Prisner, E., Topp, J., Vestergaard, P.D.: Well-covered simplicial, chordal and circular arc graphs. J. Graph Theory 21, 113–119 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravindra, G.: Well-covered graphs. J. Comb. Inf. Syst. Sci. 2, 20–21 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankaranarayana, R.S., Stewart, L.K.: Complexity results for well-covered graphs. Networks 22, 247–262 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tankus, D., Tarsi, M.: Well-covered claw-free graphs. J. Comb. Theory B 66, 293–302 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tankus, D., Tarsi, M.: The structure of well-covered graphs and the complexity of their recognition problems. J. Comb. Theory B 69, 230–233 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita, M., Kameda, T.: Modeling k-coteries by well-covered graphs. Networks 34, 221–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments. Our special gratitude is to the reviewer that brought to our attention the paper [8], where the MONOTONE SAT problem had been discussed first.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim E. Levit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levit, V.E., Tankus, D. Complexity Results for Generating Subgraphs. Algorithmica 80, 2384–2399 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0325-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0325-1

Keywords

Navigation