Abstract
Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS), the temporal coordination of a rhythmic movement with an external rhythm, has been studied most often in tasks that require tapping along with a metronome. Models of SMS use information about the timing of preceding stimuli and responses to predict when the next response will be made. This article compares the theoretical structure and empirical predictions of four two-parameter models proposed in the literature: Michon (Timing in temporal tracking, Van Gorcum, Assen, 1967), Hary and Moore (Br J Math Stat Psychol 40:109–124, 1987b), Mates (Biol Cybern 70:463–473, 1994a; Biol Cybern 70:475–484, 1994b), and Schulze et al. (Mus Percept 22:461–467, 2005). By embedding these models within a general linear framework, the mathematical equivalence of the Michon, Hary and Moore, and Schulze et al. models is demonstrated. The Mates model, which differs from the other three, is then tested empirically with new data from a tapping experiment in which the metronome alternated between two tempi. The Mates model predictions are found to be invalid for about one-third of the trials, suggesting that at least one of the model’s underlying assumptions is incorrect. The other models cannot be refuted as easily, but they do not predict some features of the data very accurately. Comparison of the models’ predictions in a training/test procedure did not yield any significant differences. The general linear framework introduced here may help in the formulation of new models that make better predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken AC (1935) On least squares and linear combinations of observations. Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh 55: 42–48
Best RE (2003) Phase-locked loops: design, simulation, and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York
Dorf RC (1993) The electrical engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Hary D, Moore G (1985) Temporal tracking and synchronization strategies. Hum Neurobiol 4: 73–77
Hary D, Moore G (1987a) Synchronizing human movement with an external clock source. Biol Cybern 56: 305–311. doi:10.1007/bf00319511
Hary D, Moore G (1987b) On the performance and stability of human metronome-synchronization strategies. Br J Math Stat Psychol 40: 109–124
Hasan MA, Thaut MH (1999) Autoregressive moving average modeling for finger tapping with an external stimulus. Percept Motor Skills 88: 1331–1346
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York
Kay SM (1993) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Large EW, Jones MR (1999) The dynamics of attending: How we track time-varying events. Psychol Rev 106: 119–159
Ljung L (1987) System identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Loehr JD, Large EW, Palmer C (2011) Temporal coordination and adaptation to rate change in music performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. doi:10.1037/a0023102
Mates J (1994a) A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. I. Timing and error corrections. Biol Cybern 70: 463–473. doi:10.1007/bf00203239
Mates J (1994b) A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. II. Stability analysis, error estimation and simulations. Biol Cybern 70: 475–484. doi:10.1007/bf00203240
McAuley JD, Jones MR (2003) Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29: 1102–1125
Michon JA (1967) Timing in temporal tracking. Van Gorcum, Assen
Michon JA, van der Valk NJL (1967) A dynamic model of timing behavior. Acta Psychol 27: 204–212
Pressing J (1998a) Error correction processes in temporal pattern production. J Math Psychol 42: 63–101
Pressing J (1998b) Referential behavior theory: A framework for multiple perspectives on motor control. In: Piek JP (ed) Motor behavior and human skill: a multidisciplinary approach. Hum Kinetics, Champaign, pp 357–384
Pressing J (1999) The referential dynamics of cognition and action. Psychol Rev 106: 714–747
Pressing J, Jolley-Rogers G (1997) Spectral properties of human cognition and skill. Biol Cybern 76: 339–347. doi:10.1007/s004220050347
Rao CR, Toutenburg H (1999) Linear models: least squares and alternatives. Springer, New York
Repp BH (2001a) Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 600–621
Repp BH (2001b) Processes underlying adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization. Hum Mov Sci 20: 277–312
Repp BH (2005) Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonom Bullet Rev 12: 969–992. doi:10.3758/bf03206433
Repp BH (2008) Perfect phase correction in synchronization with slow auditory sequences. J Motor Behav 40: 363–367
Repp BH (2010) Sensorimotor synchronization and perception of timing: Effects of music training and task experience. Hum Mov Sci 29: 200–213
Repp BH, Keller PE (2004) Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects of intention, attention, and awareness. Quart J Exp Psychol 57: 499–521
Repp BH, Keller PE (2008) Sensorimotor synchronization with adaptively timed sequences. Hum Mov Sci 27: 423–456
Repp BH, Keller PE, Jacoby N (2012) Quantifying phase correction in sensorimotor synchronization: empirical comparison of three paradigms. Acta Psychol 139: 281–290
Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Rudin W (1987) Real and complex analysis. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Schulze H-H, Cordes A, Vorberg D (2005) Keeping synchrony while tempo changes: accelerando and ritardando. Mus Percept 22: 461–477
Schulze H-H, Vorberg D (2002) Linear phase correction models for synchronization: parameter identification and estimation of parameters. Brain Cog 48: 80–97
Semjen A, Schulze H-H, Vorberg D (2000) Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping. Psychol Res 63: 137–147. doi:10.1007/pl00008172
Thaut MH, Miller RA, Schauer LM (1998a) Multiple synchronization strategies in rhythmic sensorimotor tasks: phase vs period correction. Biol Cybern 79: 241–250. doi:10.1007/s004220050474
Thaut MH, Tian B, Azimi-Sadjadi MR (1998b) Rhythmic finger tapping to cosine-wave modulated metronome sequences: evidence of subliminal entrainment. Hum Mov Sci 17: 839–863
Torre K, Delignières D (2008) Unraveling the finding of 1/f β noise in self-paced and synchronized tapping: a unifying mechanistic model. Biol Cybern 99: 159–170
Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory: adaptive and learning systems for signal processing, communications, and control. Wiley, New York
Vorberg D, Schulze H (2002) A two-level timing model for synchronization. J Math Psychol 46: 57–87
Vorberg D, Wing A (1996) Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In: Keele S, Heuer H (eds) Handbook of perception and action, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 181–262
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973) Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept Psychophys 14: 5–12
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973) The timing of interresponse intervals. Percept Psychophys 13: 455–460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacoby, N., Repp, B.H. A general linear framework for the comparison and evaluation of models of sensorimotor synchronization. Biol Cybern 106, 135–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0482-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0482-x